Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

2008-03-20 Thread Skye Poier Nott
e: I had a similar issue that was caused by caching. Do you have mod_cache or mod_disk_cache active? are they clearing properly? Skye Poier Nott wrote: Hi Joshua, I've tried changing MaxClients from 256 to 512 to 1024, no effect. I've tried changing from MPM prefork to worker, and tw

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

2008-03-19 Thread Skye Poier Nott
ks, Skye On 19-Mar-08, at 12:28 PM, Joshua Slive wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Skye Poier Nott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am doing some load testing on a reverse proxy with apache 2.2 + mod_proxy and I'm getting terrible throughput, I was wondering if anyone had a su

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with Rendering Images

2008-03-18 Thread Skye Poier Nott
Its not an apache issue, its a browser issue. Apache serves the tif file the same whether it was entered directly in the location bar or referenced from html. The browser is in charge of rendering the image inside the document. Skye On 18-Mar-08, at 5:48 PM, Liz Kim wrote: I dont thi

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy performance with apache 2.2

2008-03-18 Thread Skye Poier Nott
Hi, I am doing some load testing on a reverse proxy with apache 2.2 + mod_proxy and I'm getting terrible throughput, I was wondering if anyone had a suggestion. I have the following config, all on gigabit ethernet: 1 origin server -> 2 mod_proxy servers -> 4 client simulators (flood) The