Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] adding SSL - is a distinct virtual host mandatory?

2005-10-03 Thread Robert Zagarello
No it is not required to have a separate virtual host, at least not for Apache itself. I am running V2.054 http and https on FreeBSD V5.3 with no problem. BZAG = --- Andrew Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > SuSE 9.3 hosting Apache 2.0.53 (the build from SuSE >

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache2/SSL problems

2005-09-22 Thread Robert Zagarello
Susan, What do your apache logs show (httpd-ssl_request.log, httpd_access.log and httpd_error.log in /var/log or something similar)? Yes it sounds like your SSL is running on the server but the server is not authenticating against the certificates, meaning it does not have access to the certifica

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache2/SSL problems

2005-09-22 Thread Robert Zagarello
Susan, State whether this problem occurs on more than one client, and if this is the first time you've tried using SSL from a client to this server before or not. If accessed for the first time, it's possible you have to redo your server certificates (expirations?) or delete the ones on your cli

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having error on Apachectl start

2005-09-14 Thread Robert Zagarello
I noticed on Apple's MAC OS X support site that the highest version of expat support is server 10.2 and then only using Apache 2.0.36, for eval purposes: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107014 It sounds like the expat library detection is broken, but that is really a shot in the d

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Really annoying problem either with Apache2 or PHP or both

2005-09-10 Thread Robert Zagarello
David, Connectivity issues should point to network problems first, specifically off-LAN connectivity problems. When using local LAN clients do you get disconnects? If not, see if you can put a client on the LAN segment on the other side of your LAN's router (gateway) and try to duplicate the dis

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache on DSL

2005-08-27 Thread Robert Zagarello
As an aside, an advantage of using a NAT router on cable or dialup is that you don't need to run the firewall on your Apache server because there is usually one in your router, unless you put the server in the DMZ on your router. Depending on the OS used, you may have to play with your hosts file

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Accessing my website internally

2005-07-18 Thread Robert Zagarello
Is HostNameLookups off in httpd.conf? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hello everyone, > I have my web site up and running without any > issues. But my Question is > > How do I access my site on my local network without > the outside connection. > The WEB server is on the same physical networ

Re: [users@httpd] OS 10048

2005-07-05 Thread Robert Zagarello
I would think the process only starts up on boot. Was the process IIS? If so you should be able to disable its startup using the Services app. If it was some other process not a service, you can check your normal startup locations in the registry (HKLM and HKCURR /SOFTWARE/Microsoft/Windows/Cur

Re: [users@httpd] Compiling Apache2 with Cygwin

2005-06-21 Thread Robert Zagarello
Try posting this to the Cygwin Forum also: http://cygwin.com/lists.html According to the directions at the bottom of that web page, you can post to the list without subscribing by sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscribing to the "cygwin" mailing list there is a form and directions at t

Re: [users@httpd] Compiling Apache2 with Cygwin

2005-06-21 Thread Robert Zagarello
T, Not finding header files that are clearly in your include path makes me think some silly thing is going on like file protections or permissioning. Just a thought for you to double-check on. BZAG T wrote (partially transcribed): If I specify

[users@httpd] Firefox can't connect to the SSL-Host (IE does) - exit signal Bus error (10)

2005-06-03 Thread Robert Zagarello
Oskar, I suspect your firefox test client. Have you tried checking the test client's firefox ssl settings? Does this occur from any firefox client? BZAG === Quoting Oskar Eyb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello! > > I have since a few weeks a problem with the ssl-host and the > firefox-br

RE: [users@httpd] IP Address Problem...

2005-05-31 Thread Robert Zagarello
printed > as "::" only! > > Is there any workaround to this to get the address > printed in > 255.255.255.255 format ? > And if I have to print the IPV6 address correctly > (:::255.255.255.255 > types..) what do I need to do? > > Thanks and Regards,

Re: [users@httpd] IP Address Problem...

2005-05-31 Thread Robert Zagarello
The last time I saw double colons it had to do with IPv6 vs. IPv4. Just a thought. BZAG == --- Harish Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am running Apache 2.0.53 on HP-UX Itanium machine > and I'm facing this > peculiar problem with the Server Access log. For any

Re: [users@httpd] Routing \ Apache Question

2005-05-31 Thread Robert Zagarello
try to > NAT all traffic from my > Public address to the my private LAN IP address( > I.E. 192.168.1.100). > > Are you saying that this box will always need to be > outside the firewall? > > Thanks for all of your help! > Jonathan > > - Original Message

Re: [users@httpd] Routing \ Apache Question

2005-05-31 Thread Robert Zagarello
There's one other thing. Some cable/DSL ISPs (to private LANs) actually restrict or block incoming port 80 requests (to your router) if you are using a residential broadband connection instead of purchasing a business account. BZAG === ---

Re: [users@httpd] Routing \ Apache Question

2005-05-31 Thread Robert Zagarello
Are you using name-based or IP-based multiple vhosts? Also, I've assumed you are using a private LAN instead of an internet-registered IP one, so correct me if I'm wrong. The private LAN will cause DNS name resolution problems, because your web server will have a private IP address that doesn't

Re: [users@httpd] Routing \ Apache Question

2005-05-31 Thread Robert Zagarello
Jonathan, Have you set your router to forward ports 80/443 to your web server's private LAN address(es) (or whatever port(s) the server listens to) ? Your router firewall has selectable operating modes and you need to check what you think is working with the doc at: http://www.netopia.com/equip

Re: [users@httpd] Getting 'no shared ciphers' while connecting to the server

2005-05-31 Thread Robert Zagarello
Alaka, Can you spell out the OpenSSL commands you are using to gen the key and cert? Perhaps that is where the error is and not your server. BZAG === Alaka wrote: Hi All, I'm using Apache 1.3.31 with mod_ssl 2.8.17 and OpenSSL 0.9.7d binaries. I use R

Re: [users@httpd] No route to host

2005-05-29 Thread Robert Zagarello
You need to determine if you have a real network problem or not. Surely there are other PCs on that local LAN segment. How is routing from/to those? BZ === --- Bhanu Ravichettu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been trying it since yesterday evening.. I > have also rebooted the > system

[users@httpd] Read errors for GET when is more than 64K

2005-05-28 Thread Robert Zagarello
Mark, Have you checked whether you can duplicate the problem using an SSH client into your web server, for example, by downloading large files? It might help to rule out dropped packets, both from a client within the local LAN segment and from the internet. BZAG =

[users@httpd] Random Link error

2005-05-24 Thread Robert Zagarello
Jason, You need to rule out network access problems which have nothing to do with your server. You may have problems associated with your client's network, for example. I've just been to your site and clicked several links with no problems. The usual list of suspects are: Performance issue

RE: [users@httpd] Problem in authenticating users from multiple OU of windows 2003 Active directory

2005-05-23 Thread Robert Zagarello
o make multiple entry for AuthLDAPURL. > But is does not works. > > Regards > > Vikas > > > -----Original Message- > From: Robert Zagarello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mon 5/23/2005 5:39 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [users@httpd] Problem in authenticating users from multiple OU of windows 2003 Active directory

2005-05-23 Thread Robert Zagarello
Can you try multiple directive blocks, one for each OU? BZ == --- "Vikas Kumar. Sinha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All > > I have successfully configured apache with mod_ldap > for authentication from windows 2003 active > directory. But I am facing problem in authenticating > u

[users@httpd] web server slow too much slow

2005-05-20 Thread Robert Zagarello
Msuro, I use dyndns and a private LAN also. I've found that you have to tell the web server, in its /etc/hosts file, what its dyndns name is so the web server can find its way out of your private LAN more quickly. You should put this in your web server's /etc/hosts file: 82.53.152.115 maurov

[users@httpd] win 2K install problem

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Zagarello
Some things to consider: Because you mentioned "work network", does your Win2K PC sit in a Windows domain? If so, are you sure you have full admin rights, meaning, perhaps your domain admin has installed a group policy that restricts rights on your PC? Are you logged on using your domain accoun

Re: [users@httpd] 403 on XP accessing an XML database document

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Zagarello
Rob, Web servers use a generic login account to access information on the server's file system, and it is possible that XP SP2 in its zeal to act as Terminator in its security madness may have either disabled that account or modified its permissions. Just a suggestion. BZAG

Re: [users@httpd] mod_rewrite: failed to lock file descriptor

2005-05-15 Thread Robert Zagarello
The problem with errors is that you can't take them seriously after the first one. What I mean by that is to understand all subsequent errors in the light of the first. This seems especially true of Windows. It also means if you can fix the first one the others may go away. BZAG ===

Re: [users@httpd] Apache on Linux

2005-05-15 Thread Robert Zagarello
Hmmm... I never tried this but can't one install Apache on non-Windows using a pre-packaged - i.e., pre-compiled and linked - executable? This is where the previous advice on using Gentoo or Fedora Core may come in handy, because it may be readily available for those OSs. The only reason your s