I found the following on google; you should be able to taylor it to your needs:
http://techtasks.com/code/viewbookcode/567
# This code sets the priority of a process
# ---
# Adapted from VBScript code contained in the book:
# "Window
If you are running on unix, the easiest way to probably do this is by calling
the "setpriority" from within your perl script like this:
setpriority(WHICH,WHO,PRIORITY);
To set your current running perlscript to the lowest priority, you would call
setpriority(0, $$, 20);
$$ is your script's proces
ooking thru the code but
have not yet been able to find it. :(
Richard
- Original Message
From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:34:47 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors
Richard de
Hello everyone; it's been a while since I wrote to this list since everything
has been smooth sailing so far ... but I did stumble on an issue just now that
requires ya'lls expertise.
I don't want to go into too much detail on "why" we're trying to do what we're
doing, but basically I configured
[EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTPD won't start. Fails with error message.
Connect to address 127.0.0.1 Connection refused.
"Lose not thy airspeed lest the ground rises up and smites thee." - Anon.
Richard de Vries wrote:
> It appears something else is already listening on port 80 and as such Apa
It appears something else is already listening on port 80 and as such Apache is
unable to bind to that port.
What happens when you do a "telnet localhost 80". Do you get connected?
- Original Message
From: Mike - W0TMW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, Februar
What method did you use to remove the password from
the private key you generated?
--- Brian Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying for ages to get my server running
> SSL successfully. I
> don't need port 80 (unencrypted traffic) at all,
> just 411.
>
> I have the module set up j
Put a file called "index.html" in your docroot ...
that's what resolved it for me.
--- Urijah Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I pressed refresh about a million times, and used
> two different
> browsers. Try it yourself-- 208.109dot216.147 Thank
> you for trying
> though.
>
>
> On 2/8/07,
What compiler are you using?
I had a hell of a time trying to get Apache compiled
for windows with Visual Studio Express -- I was
experiencing all kinds of weird behavior.
I finally abandoned the Express edition and tried it
with the regular Visual Studio, which resolved all my
problems.
--- Kev
Did you make sure your scan included all .htaccess
files. Depending on the syntax you ran to "scan" your
Apache directory, it may not have scanned your
.htaccess files.
I am thinking one of these files may contain a
reference to that file.
--- Nathan Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We we
Interesting problem.
I am running Apache 2.0.59 as a reverse proxy on multiple Solaris 9 and AIX
servers and have never encountered these types of issues. Perhaps you should
try upgrading to 2.0.59 on one of your development machines and see if that
makes a difference. If not, it is most likely
erns, why not!
But this particular mod_security directive aside
mod_security as an overall module is extremely
powerful and can do much much more.
R.
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/24/07, Richard de Vries
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have mod
Joshua, that is not entirely true.
By making believe you're running a different webserver
than you really are ... you can potentionally buy
yourself some valuable time.
If an attacker wants to attack/criple your site,
he/she will most likely first try all known
vulnerabilities for that webserver
Sounds like something else is already running on port
80. Is this on unix?
Try finding out what is on port 80. If you have lsof
installed, you can run the following as root:
lsof -i TCP:80
--- "Jain, Abhay K, INFOT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to use same instance of Aapche to
> p
I am an absolute newbie when it comes to mod_rewrite
and I am still going thru some documentation to see
whether I can make it do what I need.
While I am going thru the docs and examples, I figured
to post a message on this list as well, just in case
someone knows the answer right from the top of
source-code.
But anyway, thanks for the feedback!
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Richard de Vries wrote:
> > I was just curious if anyone knew when we can
> expect
> > Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or
> > still several
Hmmm ... perhaps this module got compiled with a
compiler not compatible with the compiler used to
compile apache.
I personally would still try to get a hold of the
source-code, and compile this module with apxs.
R
--- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> []# yum info mod_dav_svn
> -
I am not familiar with this module so I don't know how
it is being distributed ... but can't you just locate
the source and compile it yourself?
--- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6?
>
__
D
Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS?
It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error
when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for
linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how this happened
... long story!)
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where did mod_dav_svn.so
I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect
Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or
still several months out?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
I am running the logrotate program that comes with
Apache to manager my logfiles on Windows. It will only
roll them over, but at least this will stop the
logfile from being in use, allowing you to run a daily
batch file to either compress, delete and/or move the
old logs.
Additionally, you can dow
Thanks for the info ... I am definately going to look
into this. From a quick glance I did learn that this
is trictly cookie based. Do you know of anything that
can generate a SID and attach it to the URL?
--- Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2006, at 8:16 AM
I'm experiencing some problems with our loadbalancer
infrastructure over our Apache webservers and I've
been asked to set some sort of Session ID either in
the environment variables, or as part of the URL.
Something the loadbalancers can use to determine
session information.
I was thinking of mo
To my knowledge there is not module that would give
you realtime statistics, but you can definately
install a stats-analysis package to run analysis on
your weblogs.
I myself use awstats. It's opensource and free.
--- Liz Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Does apache keep stats of viewer
wonder if perhaps they updated their CA?
--- Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The problem is that your certificate has been signed
> by a Certificate Authority which is not trusted by
> many browsers.
>
> Your HTTPS instance worked fine on my internet
> ex
The problem is that your certificate has been signed
by a Certificate Authority which is not trusted by
many browsers.
Your HTTPS instance worked fine on my internet
explorer 7, but did indeed fail on firefox. An
examination of the certificate revealed that your
certificate was issued by StarField
You mentioned mod_security. That to me seems the best
candidate to block these types of requests. Mod
Security has an extensive ruleset and I am certain it
will have a way to accomplish this. Unfortunately, I
am pretty much a novice as it comes to mod_security
myself so I am unable to give you the
Hey everyone,
Last week I wrote about some problems I'd been having
with trying to get Apache to compile on Windows. I
received a lot of great feedback and have narrowed the
problem down to Visual Studio Express. I upgraded to
Visual Studio Professional and all previous
compilation issues have bee
649ab77e42f8f91"
> > hashalg="SHA1"> > xmlns:asmv2="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2"
> >
>
xmlns:dsig="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";> >
> >
>
Algorithm="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:HashTransforms.Identity">
;>7AY1JqoUvK3u/6bYWbOagGgAFbc=
> hash="55e8e87bbde00d1d96cc119ccd94e0c02c9a2768"
> hashalg="SHA1"> xmlns:asmv2="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v2"
>
xmlns:dsig="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";>
Algorithm="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:HashTransforms.Identit
Hi there, does anyone have any step by step
instructions on how to compile Apache under windows.
I did find a document on the apache website that
describes how to compile Apache ... and as a matter of
fact, it compiled just fine.
But I am having a hell of a time figured out how the
dependencies o
with -FollowSymLinks set.
All instances are running on Solaris 9 ... it just
doesn't make any sense.
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/2/06, Richard de Vries
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I looked thru it again ... and I did a grep on
>
I looked thru it again ... and I did a grep on
"Options" on *ALL* the config files and I can't find
anything.
# This is the working config:
$ grep "Options" *
httpd.conf:Options None
httpd.conf:# Possible values for the Options
directive are "None", "All",
httpd.conf:# Note that "Mult
> There error message is quite explicit. On the
> working server, you
> must have someplace else in the config (or an
> .htaccess or an
> Include'd config file) where you are turning on
> Options FollowSymLinks
> or SymLinksIfOwnerMatch.
That's just it, there is not. I don't have any
.htaccess f
I have a very strange situation.
I am running two webservers. Both Apache 2.0.59 with
almost identical configuration. On both servers I
configured a mod_rewrite rule. It works on one, but
not on the other.
The webserver that does not work reports the following
error message:
[Thu Nov 02 08:22:16
I know my hosting provider puts the document root for
the virtual host in the document root of the main
host. So I can look at it via
http://mainhost.domain.com/.
Personally I don't like this at all.
You could also create a /etc/host file entry on the
server running your virtual host, configure a
Sorry, should have been:
ProxyPass http://192.168.1.1/cob
ProxyPassReverse http://192.168.1.1/cob
ProxyPass http://192.168.1.3/
ProxyPassReverse http://192.168.1.3/
--- Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> How about if you split your ProxyPass directive
How about if you split your ProxyPass directives up in
Location Blocks. Does that make a difference?
i.e.
ProxyPass /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob
ProxyPassReverse /cob http://192.168.1.1/cob
ProxyPass / http://192.168.1.3/
ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.1.3/
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ah, I think your proxypassreverse statements are not
100% correct. Try disabling those and see if it makes
a difference.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I must admit I am new to Apache so there may be some
> obvious errors in our
> reverse proxy server apache config...but here it is:
>
> Listen *
Is anyone else getting duplicate emails today?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
The official User-To-User
I am running Apache 2.0.59 on a mix of servers. (Linux
/ Solaris, AIX).
How come, when I make a plain HTTP request to an SSL
Enabled port, the Solaris instances immediately close
the connection.
telnet www.abc.com 443
Trying...
Connected to www.abc.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
GET / HTTP/1.0
Co
For security reasons, I am running a reverese proxy in
front of my WebSphere App server. The WAS App Server
only listens to 127.0.0.1, and the ports that should
be exposed externally (ie. 9080, 9443 etc) are proxied
thru the proxy server that runs on the same machine.
So basically the proxy is tak
Hey, have a look at this thread. Maybe some of the
suggestions will work for you ... keep us posted:
http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-1557.html
--- "Tom Ray [Lists]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 0.9.8a was the security fix and 0.9.8b was a
> compatibility fix. The
> problem
To my knowledge this is not possible. Don't forget,
the SSL HandShake needs to be completed BEFORE your
client can successfully retrieve any data from your
webserver. So, if this handshake fails for whatever
reason (including cancelation by the user), the
connection is being torn down. i.e. Even if
I remember seeing a similiar thread somewhere and I
seem to recall it had to do with openssl 0.9.8b.
Is openssl 0.9.8b a bugfix release over 0.9.8a, or a
security fix? If 0.9.8b is only a bug fix, you could
try it with 0.9.8a?
--- "Tom Ray [Lists]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was able to inst
Try looking thru your websphere logs as well as your
http_plugin.log file. We are running a couple of
WebSphere servers on AIX as well and never had any
issues with Apache.
I am having a difficult time understanding why you are
using a proxy servlet? Why would you want to put so
much overhead on t
nformation Systems
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Office: 515-440-8581
> >
> >
> > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2006 7:59:03 AM >>>
> > Thank you! This worked.
> >
> > Shawn Beard
> > Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP
> >
1
>
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2006 7:59:03 AM >>>
> Thank you! This worked.
>
> Shawn Beard
> Web Administrator, MCSE, MCSA, MCP
> Iowa Foundation for Medical Care
> Information Systems
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Office: 515-440-8581
>
&g
Have a look at http://www.sunfreeware.com
-R
--- Shawn Beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are trying to install Apache 2.0.58 on Solaris
> 10. After recieving
> the following warnings, we try to do the make but
> that errors out.
> Also, I tried finding it but does anyone know if
> ther
WebLogic doesn't support Apache 2.2, and Apache 2.2 is
not necesarrily downwards compatible with Apache
2.0.x.
I recommend you downgrade to Apache 2.0.59 and stay on
a supported platform.
R
--- Maria Elena Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I am using Apache 2.2.3, with solaris 9 and
> AR_APA_02_CFE_01_01.pkg, one is for apche
> installing and the other for the configuration, yes
> i have solaris 9,
> sorry i forgot say it. Can help me?
>
>
> Richard de Vries escribió:
>
> >You can download installable packages from
> >www.sunfreeware.co
You can download installable packages from
www.sunfreeware.com.
In the right hand navigation, click "solaris 9" and
then click the "apache xxx" link. Be advised however
that it may require some other packages it depends on
to be installed as well. For example openSSL.
I normally create my own sol
Sounds like something fo suexec
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/suexec.html
--- Declerck Michael-W30479 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a problem with an Apache version 2.2 server
> running a Perl script
> on an Ubuntu 6.06 machine that creates and appends a
> data-file.
> Currentl
I did some googling but did not find any solutions so
I am hoping you guys may have some pointers.
I have some JSP pages that are being handled thru a
Application Server via an apache plugin. Basically,
when a request comes in for the .jsp, Apache hands it
off to the plugin, who sends it on to the
nt
> to/from this port?
>
> -ascs
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard de Vries
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 7:07 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache listening for UDP
> requests?
>
&
While debugging an issue on one of my apache
webservers with lsof, I noticed the following:
httpd 16679 http 23u IPv4 0x30008c5fa88
0t0 UDP *:41034 (Idle)
httpd 16679 http 27u IPv4 0x30008bf4d20
0t0 UDP *:* (Unbound)
httpd 16679 http 28u IPv
gt; insert an additional reverse proxy in between, it
> will still detect whether the application backend is
> available or not based on whether the status page is
> served.
>
> -ascs
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard de Vries
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
hy this should interfere with
> the work of the WAS plugin since the latter, as far
> as I recall, basically just performs routing based
> on the contents of the JSESSIONID cookie.
>
> -ascs
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard de Vries
> [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Thanks Joshua.
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/27/06, Richard de Vries
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any directive that can be set to have
> Apache
> > as a reverse proxy report REMOTE_HOST and
> REMOT
ultiple WAS backends, chances
> that no WAS is available at any given time should be
> pretty slim...
>
> -ascs
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard de Vries
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 4:50 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
I was wondering if anyone on this list has ever
configured a WebSphere environment with a reverse
Proxy (Apache) sitting between the WebSphere App
Server, and the WebServer.
Why would you want to do that you may ask? The answer
is simple ... to secure the WebSphere Application
Server instance from
Hi,
Is there any directive that can be set to have Apache
as a reverse proxy report REMOTE_HOST and REMOTE_ADDR
properly? (instead of those variables being set to the
proxy server?)
Thanks :-)
R
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
Have a look at mod_security.
(http://www.modsecurity.org)
R
--- rturnbull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to all,
> Is there a way though httpd proxy to "show" the
> arguments sent with
> a POST method? I have been trying to find a way to
> reveal arguments
> from our java applicatio
You'll probably have better luck at finding an answer
at gallery.menalto.com
But what you might want to try, is setting the
"locking mechanism" in your Gallery Configuration
(Administration pages) to DB instead of files.
R
--- Cindy O'Leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a complete n
What do the Proxy and WebSphere logfiles reveal?
Have you tried a manual HTTP connection from your
proxy server to your webserver server.
i.e.
telnet
GET / HTTP/1.0
R
--- Gabriele Barberi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already include the port but it doesn't work.
> The reverse proxy runs
You will need to configure Apache to listen to the IP
address on that specific machine behind your router;
which is most likely a private address. i.e.
192.168.x.x or 10.10.x.x
Then, in your router, go to "port forwarding" and tell
it to forward all incoming request for port 80, to the
private IP
Doesn't WebSphere run on a specific port like 9080.
(and not 80). Make sure to include that port in your
forward statement.
Thus:
ProxyPass /websphere
http://websphere-address:websphere-port/WS
Does the reverse proxy run on the WebSphere server, or
a server external to the websphere server?
R
Ok, how about
cd $source_dir/modules/proxy
$apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *proxy*.c
I know I got it to work using some sort of wildcards.
I'll try to see if I can find it back in my shell's
history.
--- JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >
> > I had a similiar problem with the mod_pr
I had a similiar problem with the mod_proxy modules,
but even specifiying these modules during the
"./configure" phase did not work properly for me.
Try this:
cd $source_dir/modules/proxy
$apache-home/bin/apxs -i -a -c *.c
R.
--- JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. My question is:
> I
Check your selinux settings. From within your desktop
"System - Administration - Security Level and
Firewall"
--- Amir Aavani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I recently installed FC5 on my laptop, Before that I
> had FC4 with latest
> version of httpd. On FC4, i developed a cgi
> application (us
did you run your ./configure with
"--enable-mods-shared=all" ?
R
--- Daniel Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> I install apache from source and the modules/ dir
> don't have any modules.
> I need to use mod_rewrite.os for a rails
> application. How can I get it?
> Thanks
> --
> D
Are you using a seperate configuration file for your
SSL instance?
Let's start with a couple of basic things.
1) Do you have the SSL configuration between tags?. If so, what is your set to in this
case?
2) SSLCertificateFile and SSLCertificateKeyFile point
to valid files right? Can you do
While trying to run my apache instance as a proxy, I
get the following error:
Cannot load
/bmc/local/apps/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so into
server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file
/bmc/local/apps/apache/modules/mod_proxy.so: symbol
ap_proxyerror: referenced symbol not found
I have my
Instead of using , try putting all your
SSL virtual host settings between
R.
--- Bill Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Krist and all... Thanks for the information you
> gave. It helped me to debug some of my mistakes in
> the .conf files and to understand a bit of what is
> going wrong.
Has anyone heard any rumble yet about the Apache
2.0.56 release date?. If I am mistaking Apache
2.0.56-dev has been out for quite some time already,
and Apache 2.0.55 does have a couple of known
issues/vulnerabilities.
R
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired o
At work I've built several webserver farms. You will
need to configure multiple apache webservers, and put
a loadbalancer in front of it. Either a hardware based
loadbalancer,or software-based loadbalancer such as
PLB. If you want multiple levels of redundancy, you
can configure a load-balanced loa
I had a similar situation with WebSphere. It's just
not compatible. I would definately recommend asking
for a Apache 2.2 WebLogic plugin, but there is a good
chance they won't have one for you.
So, in the end you may have to back down to Apache
2.0.55.
R
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
hehe ... :-)
--- Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard de Vries
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 12. April 2006 15:01
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want a timely and/or meaningful reply, you
should really consider writing your messages in
english.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sarò assente dall'ufficio a partire da Mar
> 04/04/2006 fino a Gio
> 20/04/2006.
>
> Risponderò al messaggio al mio ritorno.
>
>
>
Perhaps a known issue, though I haven't been able to
find much info on it.
Is anyone experiencing the following error.log entries
on their SSL instance:
[Tue Apr 11 23:29:18 2006] [info] (70007)The timeout
specified has expired: SSL input filter read failed.
the HTTPs instance *appears* to work
Hey there, it sounds like you should be able to get
this to work with mod_rewrite ... but either way, you
should have a look at mod_security.
(http://www.modsecurity.org/)
It can do that, and so much more!
R.
--- peter pilsl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to configure a virtual host
Hey, thanks for that excellent anwser.
Cheers!
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/15/06, Richard de Vries
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What exactly is the difference between
> > --enable-mods-shared=all and --enable-so. Is there
> a
> &
What exactly is the difference between
--enable-mods-shared=all and --enable-so. Is there a
difference?
R
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
You oughta look into mod-security. It allows you to do
some real neat stuff as far as "securing a webserver"
is concerned.
--- Kishore Jalleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes SSL would be your best bet, with .htaccess your
> passwords would be
> travelling in plain text, so go for SSL...
>
> Ki
Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Richard de Vries
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Montag, 13. März 2006 14:59
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] best practices -
> section or not?
&
So I am trying to install this 3rd party application,
and it simply won't install without a ""
section in my httpd.conf.
Since my web server is only running 1
webserver/instance ... I did not define a
section.
So, I am kinda curious. Is it strange to not define a
virtualhost section? Is it a "be
The fact "locate" shows the file as being there does
not necesarrily mean it is still there. Have you tried
doing a "ls -la /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.5". Perhaps
libexpat.so.5 is a symbolic link to a no longer
existing file?
Additionally, you could try to set your
LD_LIBRARY_PATH to specifically
A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 February 2006 21:23, Richard de
> Vries wrote:
> >
> >>I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the
> >>same apache base install.
> >
> > Erm, why?
>
&g
I have the need to run multiple daemons off of the
same apache base install. Each daemon will have it's
own configuration file of course, but since they are
all configured pretty much the same (same modules etc)
I don't see a need to have several apache installs.
So, I'd have one install, i.e.
I had the problem of "empty" logs as well. You
wouldn't happen to have the logfile settings between
tags would you ?
For some reason this wouldn't work for me. I had to
change that to
As far as bandwidth usage; either parse the logs as
someone suggested or perhaps set some counte
Why don't you grab a pre-compiled package from
http://www.sunfreeware.com
R
--- Jeff Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Sorry for the poorly formatted followup here, I just
> joined the list.
>
> Anyway, I'm using Solaris 8, using /usr/ccs/bin/make
> and I get the same
> errors regarding sed.
I had a similar problem once, though the explanation
of the root cause is quite long. Try changing the path
info to the 8.1 naming convention.
i.e.
c:\progra~1\apache\ etc instead of c:\program
files\apache\
and see if that makes a difference for you.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ho
Indigostar has a sendmail for Windows application. You
can find it here:
http://www.indigostar.com/sendmail.htm
If you google, you may even find a similar free
application somewhere.
--- Shipra Mehta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Apache for windows XP v. 2.0.55. I would
> lik
ve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/06, Richard de Vries
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in
> the
> > main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK
> > methods. However, the
Hey all,
I configured a couple of mod_rewrite directives in the
main configuration file to disable the TRACE/TRACK
methods. However, these rules do not seem to make it
into the HTTPS instance; even though I put them in the
main config, and not in the virtual hosts.
# Disable/Block TRACE/TRACK req
be the
"mod_real_name.c" ?
--- Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm ... nope, that didn't work either :(
>
> Just for fun I used an directive from an
> other module that is loaded ... i..e ssl_module> which I know works on other
> configuratio
ave:
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Keith
>
>
> In theory, theory and practice are the same;
> In practice they are not.
>
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Richard de Vries wrote:
>
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > From: Richard de Vries <[E
I am having the weirdest problem. Running Apache
2.0.55 on Solaris 9, I am unable to get Apache to
generate and write to the access_log file while the
CustomLog directive is enclosed in the
tags.
This is what I have:
#
# The following directives define some format
nicknames for use wi
98 matches
Mail list logo
