Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to integrate Apache HTTPD 2.0.x + Tomcat 6.0.x

2007-10-02 Thread Pid
Don't worry, OP also posted to Tomcat-Users, it's being addressed there. p Serge Dubrouski wrote: > Don't know why to read some strange blogs while there is plenty of > official documentation: > > http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/index.html > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_prox

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Default Context Issue

2007-06-05 Thread Pid
Nitin Dubey wrote: I want to set up a default web application for my domain. This is really a Tomcat question, ask it on the tomcat users list and I will answer it there. p To start a new topic, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems with mod_proxy etc and open proxy

2007-06-01 Thread Pid
Graeme Fowler wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 21:00 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote: 72.28.205.136 - - [01/Jun/2007:12:15:24 +1000] "GET http://www.sun.com/ HTTP/1.1" 200 1261 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 ( Windows; U; Windows NT4.0; DigiExt )" What else do I need to do? Probably nothing. Have you tried to mak

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIF image files

2007-05-08 Thread Pid
What kind of application/browser are you using to display it? I suspect that your browser doesn't know how to display a TIFF rather than Apache not being able to send it. p Vaughn, Terry wrote: Hello all, I really need a nudge in the right direction. I have some TIF files that I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking direct access to *.jsp pages through Apache2

2007-04-23 Thread Pid
Nitin Dubey wrote: Nitin>My comments below.. -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 4:28 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking direct access to *.jsp pages through Apache2 Nitin Dubey wrote: Ohh..

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxying GET and POST requests

2007-04-23 Thread Pid
wi wrote: Hi all We have a need (driven by some load/caching issues) to split our incoming traffic so that GET requests go to one set of servers and POST requests go to another part of the farm. Unfortunately, there's no simple URI based way of identifying which is which, so I'm wondering wh

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking direct access to *.jsp pages through Apache2

2007-04-23 Thread Pid
to the page and force a login anyway if your security is set up right in Tomcat. If you can direct access the JSP without logging in, your security is broken. p I apologize for reply to all :) - Nitin -----Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 22,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking direct access to *.jsp pages through Apache2

2007-04-22 Thread Pid
Can you give an example of when a JSP on your system would be served through mod_jk, but also be available raw through Apache? p Nitin Dubey wrote: Hello, - I need to block direct access to *.jsp pages through apache2. (mod_jk is configured with tomcat) - tomcat will no way be acc

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and ajax

2007-04-19 Thread Pid
Richard Dunne wrote: I was using localhost:8080 on jakarta tomcat to view php webpages and execute an xmlhttprequest, but I found that this version on tomcat was not compatible with php scripts. So I installed apache 2.0 instead. Now when I try to execute the same request, I am getting this

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to cache the responses for XMLHttpRquest

2007-03-07 Thread Pid
Erica Zhang wrote: Hi, I want to cache the responses for XMLHttpRequest, that is dynamic content. I have configureed http.conf using Expires to add headers to those responses. However, I still could not find those responses to be able to be cached by use of web browser (Firefox 2.0). Also, I t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite + proxy requests + mod_exf_filter

2007-02-23 Thread Pid
Nick Kew wrote: On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:56:06 +0600 "Sergey N. Romanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Without rewrite engine filter works fine and I can see that content is changed by filter. But when rewrite engine is activated, then I can see, that content is not changed. Can someone explain me

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Pid
Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux box I want to keep them the same, and I don't plan on upgrading Linux. If it isn't broke, don't mess with it. if everyone did that, we'd still be banging flints together. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RTAI

2007-02-16 Thread Pid
Krist van Besien wrote: On 2/16/07, imthiaz khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: does RTAI supports apache web server ,give some details You have just been given the honor of becoming the first person on users@httpd.apache.org to end up in my killfilter. Goodbye Krist LOL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disable TRACE HTTP method on Apache 1.3.33

2007-02-13 Thread Pid
rary methods. === -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:30 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org <mailto:users@httpd.apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disable TRACE HTTP method on Apache 1.3.33

2007-02-13 Thread Pid
try this... http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/mod/core.html#limit Deny from all p Yaniv Ofer wrote: Hello Our application is running over Apache 1.3.33. As a result of a failed security test, we have been asked to disable the TRACE HTTP method on our Apache Server. Could you please

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.4 + mod_proxy + tomcat 6.0.9 + ColdFusion

2007-02-12 Thread Pid
l requests to that. ask about configuring Tomcat webapps on the tomcat-user list & I'll look out for you there. Thanks again for your advice, and if you have any further advice I would greatly appreciate it. ~Dave On Monday 12 February 2007 04:29:33 Pid wrote: Dave Shuck wrote:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.4 + mod_proxy + tomcat 6.0.9 + ColdFusion

2007-02-12 Thread Pid
Dave Shuck wrote: Pid, I appreciate your response. I would like to understand this a little better as it is currently just slightly more clear than voodoo magic to me. Is the specification of the port what points it to a specific instance on Tomcat? If so, I am assuming that I have to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.4 + mod_proxy + tomcat 6.0.9 + ColdFusion

2007-02-11 Thread Pid
ReWriteEngine on RewriteRule ^\/(.+)\.cfm(.+)? ajp://localhost:8009/$1.cfm$2 [P,L] RewriteRule ^\/(.+)\.cfc(.+)? ajp://localhost:8009/$1.cfc$2 [P,L] Dave Shuck wrote: I am trying to set up ColdFusion as a Tomcat application using Apache 2.2.4 as the web server. Previously when using Jrun

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daylight Savings 2007

2007-01-25 Thread Pid
Apache can't run Servlets, you need a Servlet container (like Tomcat) for that. Neither Apache or Tomcat are aware of the change, they rely on the operating system and the JVM respectively. If the OS & JVM are safe, then so are both servers. p John Flores wrote: Yes, but this is the first

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending 2+ GIG data via mod_proxy hangs Apache 2.2.3 with 100% CPU.

2006-11-03 Thread Pid
2 gig of what, sorry? toadie D wrote: > Environment: > Apache 2.2.3 > Windows 2000 > > Config: > > Apache 2.2.3 --->> mod_proxy/proxy_http ---> Tomcat 5.5.x > > When a client sends via HTTP (or /S) to apache which proxies the > request to the backend Tomcat , at right around 2 GIG mark

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_jk or proxy_ajp

2006-09-18 Thread Pid
Search the archive for mod_proxy_ajp, a couple of weeks ago I posted a sample of how to use mod_rewrite [p] to select .jsp files and forward them instead of using ProxyPass. pid Martyn wrote: > Hi all > I have set up apache 2.2.3 using the latest release of mod_jk 1.2.18 with > gla

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_load_balance issue

2006-09-14 Thread Pid
Have you looked in the logs to see what the source of the error message is? Where is the error, the front server or the balanced servers? Günther Mittermayer wrote: > Hi all, > > i have httpd working with mod_proxy and mod_load_balance, but my system > is very unstable. In the middle of my ses

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy incorrectly decodes %2C when proxying URL to back-end?

2006-09-08 Thread Pid
Search the archives, I seem to remember seeing a discussion about something like this fairly recently. Robert Jaeschke wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > Jeff Ambrosino schrieb: >> We have a mod_proxy (2.0.54) front-end proxying to a back-end MS IIS >> server. One type of URL that we use is causing probl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_balancer configuration question

2006-08-21 Thread Pid
Look in the server error_log to see what the 403 is being issued for, and if that doesn't help, post that to the list and we might be able to help. Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, I'm trying to configure mod_proxy_balancer with a simple cluster and have run into a configuration problem that has me st

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: 400 Bad Request Error

2006-08-21 Thread Pid
try adding &ext=.rss or &ext=.xml to the end of the URl, in IE Rob Wilkerson wrote: One more thing I should mention: The requested file is returned with an application/rss+xml mime type. I don't know whether that has any impact on the problem I'm seeing, but I thought I'd throw it out t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Real Time Monitor

2006-08-18 Thread Pid
tail -f access_log Ki Song wrote: Is there a plugin or software you can use to see "real time" traffic on my apache server? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dynamically creating php files and serving in apache

2006-08-16 Thread Pid
Joshua Slive wrote: On 8/15/06, Ryan McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Right now using Apache 2.0.54 and mod_jk to connect with Tomcat 5.0.28. We have a requirement that the pages served by tomcat be php, these pages should then be handled by mod_php then sent back to the client. Is this pos

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] problem with apache and php files

2006-08-16 Thread Pid
post your vhosts if it's downloading the PHP file it's either a caching issue in your browser, or it's because Apache isn't forwarding to PHP to process the file under some condition. p BGREE07 wrote: It could also be a cache problem. If at some time in the past you had Apache incorrectl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2nd try: Load balancing Apache on both HTTP and HTTPS

2006-08-07 Thread Pid
Nes Yarug wrote: > Hi all, > > 2nd try to see if anyone can shed some light on my configuration. > > I've been trying to configure Apache's balancer proxy, but have not had any > luck. I've been trying to configure a load balancing proxy that forwards > requests to 2 web servers. I want both ht

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best Practice Question

2006-07-27 Thread Pid
or include your includes in httpd.conf manually, in the right order. 2.2 uses conf/extra for additional includes. also, if you know that the module is configured and installed, what advantage does the IfModule offer? Boyle Owen wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrew Walmsley [mail

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 appending some extra lines

2006-07-20 Thread Pid
it looks like you've enabled the custom ErrorDocument directive for the 200 error code. try disabling it. Chappidi, Sudhakar wrote: > > > Hello All, > > I have some problem with Apache2.0 while sending the response. > When accessing the request from the browser , the response sent is got > p

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache error

2006-07-18 Thread Pid
sanjaya weerakoon wrote: > I try to install apache, sun ultra 1 server which has solaris 9 > installed it. But when i run ./configure out put as follows. > > checking for chosen layout... Apache > checking for working mkdir -p... yes > checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.9 > checkin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help with rewrite rule

2006-07-17 Thread Pid
RewriteRule /(.*)(/)?$ http://localhost:81/$1$2 you need the second dollar variable to pick up the second pair of brackets, instead of always appending a slash. Mike Soultanian wrote: > Boysenberry Payne wrote: >> How about adding this: >> >> RewriteRule /(.*)(/)?$ http://localhost:81/$1/ [P] >>

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please help... apache hacked?

2006-07-15 Thread Pid
Morgan Gangwere wrote: > On 7/15/06, Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks Max. >> >> > A first look shows that the script "bots.txt" currently available >> targets >> > vulnerable installation of "Joomla" and "Mambo". There are some >> > vulnerabilities reported for the included

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] flushing packets in Apache 2.2

2006-07-14 Thread Pid
I think the script is returning the proxy map, not the output, no? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07/13/06 >at 03:15 PM, Arjun Datta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> The problem is that since apache waits for the entire request to come >> through before passing on the p

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows and Server Side Includes

2006-07-13 Thread Pid
if it's called "home.shtm", you'll need to: AddType text/html .shtm AddOutputFilter INCLUDES .shtm Jack Gostl wrote: > I'm using 2.2.2 under Windows XP SP2, and I can't seem to get server > side includes to work. Specifically file includes. > > Here is a typical statement from a file c

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin

2006-07-11 Thread Pid
you would probably want the spamassassin mailing list for that, rather than the httpd list. try here: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists Mididoc Productions wrote: > Hello, > > my name is mike roland. > i'm not a unix expert. > > we have a vps server with for virtual host domain

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.2 manual problem

2006-07-09 Thread Pid
check that the manual include conf file is enabled, near the end of the httpd.conf Jim the Standing Bear wrote: > hello, > > I just downloaded, compiled and installed httpd 2.2.2. The installation > went fine, however, I wasn't able to read the documentation in the > docs/manual/ directory.

Re: SV: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Distributed Web Server

2006-07-05 Thread Pid
Jacqui Caren wrote: > Pid wrote: >> Hardward load balancing is when you use specific types of network >> equipment which present a single external interface while directing >> traffic evenly between the servers behind it. >> >> Software does the same, but you

Re: SV: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Distributed Web Server

2006-07-04 Thread Pid
Do you actually want/mean a distributed web server? I think you mean that you want to a load balance your site. Alex was referring to SoftWare(SW) load balancing and HardWare(HW) load balancing. Both of these techniques involve using multiple physical machines to serve pages which appear to come

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] specifying https-specific directives

2006-07-04 Thread Pid
Joshua Slive wrote: > On 7/3/06, Marton Fabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I have a Apache/2.0.55 running on a BSD machine. >> >> I'm wondering how I could specify a different set of directives for a >> given directory based on whether it's accesed through plain HTTP or >> HTTPS -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] strange log

2006-07-03 Thread Pid
Norbul wrote: > I use http://host/server-status site to show status, and then on this site > is few "normal" request and this from ::1 without pid ??? > > - Original Message - > From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Mond

Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] how to prevent directory listing

2006-07-03 Thread Pid
> > I hope I need to configure at httpd only. > > > > I added below lines in httpd.conf, but > > > > > > Options -Indexes > > > > > > > > Please suggest the solution. > > > > > > Regards, > > Rajesh &

Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED] how to prevent directory listing

2006-07-03 Thread Pid
You mentioned Tomcat... Which directory listing is showing, the Apache one or the Tomcat one? You have to configure them separately, as Apache will pass straight through to Tomcat. More details Rajesh? Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 03.07.06 12:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Thanks for your

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "public_html" for each user don"t work.

2006-07-02 Thread Pid
Again, How to configure a directory: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#directory Security tips (e.g. how to avoid "Permission Denied"): http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/misc/security_tips.html Then read the user_dir config instructions: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_userd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache and ssl

2006-06-29 Thread Pid
Does anyone else think that this is wrong? SSLCertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/certs/sitename.com.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/apache2/ssl/keys/sitename.com.key >> SSLCACertificateFile /etc/apache2/ssl/root/sitename.com.crt It looks like you're telling it that the Certifica

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] chmod

2006-06-28 Thread Pid
it's telling you that it can't find "c:\inetpub\wwwroot\chrisandhayz\Forum\install\index.php" not that it can't find "../sources/ipsclass.php" Chris Ackford wrote: > ok so... im trying to install invision power board and it says i have to > change conf_global.php to at least 0666 i have untick

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (again) Can not define "default" name virtual host

2006-06-27 Thread Pid
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 27.06.06 13:30, Neil A. Hillard wrote: >> I don't understand what the problem is here. I've tested the >> configuration suggested and it works fine (OK, I had to change the IP >> address to match my setup): >> >> >> ServerName 195.168.3.66 >> DocumentRoot /h

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (again) Can not define "default" name virtual host

2006-06-27 Thread Pid
Neil A. Hillard wrote: > Hi, > You have made sure you've got a NameVirtualHost 195.168.3.66:80 set? > > When not supplying a 'Host:' header or supplying the IP address in the > 'Host:' header then Apache responds using the first virtual server but > if the name 'default.fantomas.sk' is used then

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (again) Can not define "default" name virtual host

2006-06-27 Thread Pid
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> Your problem here is that the ServerName requires a fully-qualified >> domain name, rather than an IP address. > > I think that ServerName could contain anything that users may request in the > Host: header ;-) Yes, I'd gathered that you think it ought to do som

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (again) Can not define "default" name virtual host

2006-06-27 Thread Pid
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> afaik the server does not resolve IP's to hosts here (do you have other >>> informations?) >> >> >> ServerName 195.168.3.66 >> DocumentRoot /home/webs/195.168.3.66 >> >> >> >> ServerName default.fantomas.sk >> DocumentRoot /home/webs/default.fantomas.sk >> >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (again) Can not define "default" name virtual host

2006-06-27 Thread Pid
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 27.06.06 09:34, Pid wrote: >> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On 26.06.06 16:45, Pid wrote: >>>> It maps there because it's the first in the list. >>> Pardon? My problem is that request for "195.168

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (again) Can not define "default" name virtual host

2006-06-27 Thread Pid
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 26.06.06 16:45, Pid wrote: >> It maps there because it's the first in the list. > > Pardon? My problem is that request for "195.168.3.66" goes to > "default.fantomas.sk" although "195.168.3.66" has its ow

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Logs indicating something not right!

2006-06-26 Thread Pid
Joshua Slive wrote: > On 6/26/06, Errol Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've posted my logs to an external URL. >> http://www.dfi-intl.com/~hidden/suspectlogs.txt. >> Essentially, my logs show hits for paths, URLs and files not even hosted >> on my box. Is my redirect too wide open? > > I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (again) Can not define "default" name virtual host

2006-06-26 Thread Pid
It maps there because it's the first in the list. If you want a VH to operate under the IP only, put it first. Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> On 6/26/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> this is my current configuration of apache (debian: 1.3.33-6sarge1): >>> >>> NameVirtual

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with Virtual Hots

2006-06-25 Thread Pid
Stephen wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: >> >> Very old version. An upgrade would be a good idea. >> > In time. This is not a production server. I am just wanting to develop > some PHP/MySQL stuff for my hosted web site. >> Sounds like a DNS problem. When you lookup www.domaintest.com, do you >> ge

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with Virtual Hots

2006-06-25 Thread Pid
Stephen wrote: > I am trying to use my Linux box (Red Hat ) as an apache server (2.0.40 ) > for testing and development but I cannot get the virtual hosting working. > > I am accessing from a Windows machine and the domains are resolved in > the windows host file. I can ping them just fine, and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

2006-06-23 Thread Pid
and please stop emailing the list Anders Norrbring wrote: > hui xu skrev: >> Please unsub me form the maillist, I have tried many times, the >> mailist continue send me the mails. > > Just send an empty mail from the subscribed address to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Different users for different vhosts

2006-06-22 Thread Pid
not sure about the threading, but suexec was commonly used to separate different hosts into different user spaces. http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=suexec+%2B+apache Florian Lindner wrote: > Hello, > is it possible to assign each vhost a own process (or a process pool) with a > distinct us

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RE: /my.html#mySection

2006-06-21 Thread Pid
Mike - EMAIL IGNORED wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:42:33 -0600, David Salisbury wrote: > > [...] > The occasional appearance of #ZZZ in my logs therefore still remains > a mystery. By the way, I can duplicate it if I use nc on another > Linux box to send an (in)appropriate GET. Which user-ag

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: /my.html#mySection

2006-06-20 Thread Pid
Boyle Owen wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike - >> EMAIL IGNORED >> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:21 PM >> To: users@httpd.apache.org >> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: /my.html#mySection >> Linux mbrc20 2.6.14-1.1656_FC4 #1 Thu Jan 5 22

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache2.2 + Tomcat5.5 + mod_proxy_ajp

2006-06-19 Thread Pid
Hi, We're running the following: Apache2.2 + Tomcat5.5.17 with mod_proxy, mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_balancer. There are virtual servers running sub-domains in each both Tomcat & Apache. The balancer configuration is below. *1st question, are there any obvious gotchas in the config (see below)