On 31/8/21 6:10 am, apache-httpd-us...@thomas.freit.ag wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 30.08.21 04:24, Peter Horn wrote:
I have been successfully running an Apache server for some years (currently
2.4.41 on Ubuntu 20.04LTS).
I have three "real" http vhosts on port 80, findable through a d
I have been successfully running an Apache server for some years
(currently 2.4.41 on Ubuntu 20.04LTS).
I have three "real" http vhosts on port 80, findable through a dynamic
DNS service. I also have a (first in line) default vhost with an
"unreachable" ServerName, which returns a 4xx status, an
On 06:59, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Zaccone, Warren wrote:
yes. so I am I. The default setting is 30 seconds however pstack shows all 256
children running this script indefinitely - until I stop and restart httpd.
This statement in the php doc is leading me to beli
On 06:59, Norman Khine wrote:
i get these in my
# tail -f /var/log/apache2/error_log
[Tue Aug 17 15:13:00 2010] [notice] Apache/2.2.15 (Unix)
mod_ssl/2.2.15 OpenSSL/0.9.8o configured -- resuming normal operations
[Tue Aug 17 15:14:56 2010] [error] [client 188.165.201.59] File does
not exist: /
Jorge wrote:
>The sane sultion would be to setup a default host (first vhost ==
default) and just deny all access to it.
>You'll still get hit but all requests without a hostname get denied.
Jorge,
You may have missed my original post a few days ago (95182). I know many
ways to deny access; w
J Greenlees wrote:
>personally, I would consider a permanent redirect to 127.0.0.1 for all
but your one excepted case on access of the default virtual host.
>their bots will screw their own server that way. ;)
Sorry to bring you the bad news, Jaqui, but bots don't respect
redirection. I suspe
On 06:59, Igor Cicimov wrote:
>
> Have you tried mod_security? It's very configurable so might suite
your needs.
>
> Sent from my phone
>> On May 20, 2010 3:52 PM, "Peter Horn" wrote:
>>
>> I have a home server running 4 name vhosts, using a dyna
I have a home server running 4 name vhosts, using a dynamic DNS. The
second, third and fourth vhosts are "real" and known to the DNS. The
default (first) vhost is only accessible by IP address (or an abstruse
and unpublished servername). It gets quite a bit of traffic by IP
address which is cle
Peter Horn wrote:
Hi All,
I've been running Apache 2.2.9 / PHP 5.2.6 / Win XP SP3 with 3 named
vhosts for about a year with no real problems. Recently I added a
fourth vhost to run a Drupal site. This involved adding mySQL, and it
all worked after the usual few setup iterations. Afte
Hi All,
I've been running Apache 2.2.9 / PHP 5.2.6 / Win XP SP3 with 3 named
vhosts for about a year with no real problems. Recently I added a fourth
vhost to run a Drupal site. This involved adding mySQL, and it all
worked after the usual few setup iterations. After the site was running
happi
I don't think this is quite off-topic, just a bit left of centre. :-\
I run a small site with two subdomains of no-ip.org (like dyndns) using
NameVirtualHost. Looking at the access log, a few percent of my traffic
was from bots like Morfeus F***ing Scanner [my censorship], intrusion
attempts (e
Hi,
My first post here, so be gentle :)
I'm doing exactly this - downloading java apps to mobile phones, which
can then access content at the same URL using http.
My technique is to pull apart the User-Agent header (see docs for
BrowserMatch), then use some php to crunch the results. (The crunch
12 matches
Mail list logo