Is the CA cert signed with SHA-1? If so, you can try to check if the CA has
a cross-signed CA cert with SHA2 you can use for the customer's current
certificate chain or just tell your customer to reissue the cert with a
full SHA2 chain.
Best Regards
/P
--
--
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:27, Craig H
Hello
I think I have discovered a bug, where using a log file vs using a pipe
command will not log the exact same messages.
System:
Server version: Apache/2.4.56 (Unix)
Server built: Jul 10 2023 10:58:41
root@ns-pedros# uname -a
FreeBSD ns-pedros 11.4-NETSCALER-13.1 FreeBSD 11.4-NETSCALER-13.1
regards
Pedro Antonio Moreno Sanchez
Telecommunication Engineer & Researcher
Bioengineering and Telemedicine Group
ETSI Telecomunicación - UPM A.101-8L.
Ciudad Universitaria s/n
28040 MADRID - SPAIN
Tel. +34 91 549 57 00 ext. 3407
Fax + 34 91 336 68 28
e-mail: <mailto:pmor...@gbt.tfo
Hi everyone,
We recently configured a new front and backend (Apache 2.26 -> Tomcat 6)
with the AJP connector. It seems to be working great, but when we began
load testing we realized we had to tweak it a little, the machines are
quad cores with 16 gigs running on Linux.
My question is how ma
Its essential to proxy to Tomcat on the internal network only, you can also
configure Tomcat to accept requests only from specific servers (i.e. your
front end), and use a connector like mod_jk, and disable the other
connectors.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Christian Folini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Apache, we have solved this though using yet another
amazing rewrite directive, which is ideal because we implement filters
and libraries we don't want to fiddle with.
Peter
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Pedro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2
Hi Owen,
Thanks for your response. I thought Tomcat would redirect using the
request header, which contains the correct host name. So I think I could
probably use it then?
Peter
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Pedro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12
Hi all,
My Configuration consists of an Apache 2.0 front-end and Tomcat 5.5.20
backend, I use mod_proxy with mod_rewrite to reverse proxy. We have
configured 'sticky sessions' using a rewrite rule, this configuration is
soon to be replaced though with Apache 2.2 and the mod_proxy_balancer.
what they
did to solve it.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=pt-PT&q=%3Amake_sock%3A+could+not+bind+to+address+0.0.0.0%3A80&meta=
By the way, RTFM stands for Read The F**king Manual :D
HTH,
Pedro
Siegard wrote:
I'm using windows xp, downloaded Apache 2.2.4 win32 installer. I have
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Pedro LaWrench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my main server, I allow all with
> >
> > Order allow,deny
> > Allow all
> >
> >
> > Then in a virtual server (different port)
In my main server, I allow all with
Order allow,deny
Allow all
Then in a virtual server (different port) I have
Order deny,allow
Allow from 10.1.2.3
Deny from all
Yet, it appears that all hosts can access /mydocs through the virtual server.
Even with a deny for / in a virtual server config,
2007 18:50
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0 access.log locks
On Feb 6, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Rui Pedro Duarte Pinge ((SSI)) wrote:
> Any ideas on how to overcome this issue? Did anyone noticed the
> same behaviour?
Pipe the log into a program usi
Hi,
I'm using Apache 2.0.59 on Windows Server 2003 (with SP1). When apache serves
several requests per second (2, or 3) I noticed that the access.log file is
locked even for reading.
This turns out to be a problem since I have online monitoring using the
access.log file. I have this problem e
nguage and would consider any, even C.
Does anybody know
how I can accomplish that?
Thanks in
advance,
Pedro.
14 matches
Mail list logo
