What is the persistence setting on the Load Balancers? Is it different if
persistence is turned off competely? Weighting servers will throw this off
completely.
Thanks-
Peter J. Milanese, Senior Systems Engineer
Information Technology Group
The New York Public Library
pet...@nypl.org - 212.621.0
>
> >
> > Obviously not in this case as this person wouldn't ne here complaining
about
> > apache and its processes. The issue here is the CPU is too weak even
if it
> > is a 2.4Ghz processor. The E2220 isn't suitable for a server
processor.
> > Its strictly for home computing. I help remote a
Greetings-
I'm sure there is a more focused approach, but figure someone on this
list will have had this experience.
I setup authLDAP to AD's LDAP on one of our boxes that is not running
winbind, with version 2.2.8 of apache.
Config Below-
Order deny,allow
Hi folks-
I am implementing a new infrastructure. It consists of pre-dev, dev,
staging, and production boxes behind F5's. I also implemented a Polyserve
matrix over the SAN.
That being said, what's everyone's take on shared binaries with the apache
configs macro'd to the hostnames (including
Before we started spending money on analytics, I did some
work with analog and webalizer. Both are decent tools for the task. Once the
demand started to increase, I took peices of openstats (does anyone else even
know of this one?) and did a bit of work to it. Made it real-time,
added demogr
About once a week or so Apache just stops listening and we have to restart
the Apache service. I had found in one of my php scripts a problem with
some database calls. The result set was being populated over and over
again in a loop that may occur several thousand times. I added an un
> Hello,
>
> I have a very unusual problem running httpd 1.3.27 on Solaris 2.8. The
> daemon is forking and consuming 80-95% of the CPU and meanwhile requests
> are just hanging. Nothing seems to be making it into the logs. We're
> totally perplexed about this one. Unfortunately these produ
Not to sound harsh or anything, but hows about some more ram?
-Original Message-
From: Carl Wistedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 9:06 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] File upload
Hi!
I have been tampering with a little problem for a
Fedora is nothing more than a sanctioned carry-forth of former Redhat
development. There is no declaration on what platform it has to be used.
Let us not forget that it is nothing more than a linux distribution.
Personally I do not care for the RH Enterprise stuff, and I am certain
that others have
Did you debug the code? Throw in some timers? Run some stats on your
queries? I do not think that any of the process timeouts will do anything
for you, but I think you already found that out.
What have you done on the oracle side to test this?
Is the root of the problem:
It takes too long to
Is that all you're running?
Are you running any fancy xml nonsense? Xslt? Any other preprocessors?
Sometimes those open up a bizzilion temp files. Especially search indexes
(like lucene) if the indexes are not built correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Kirchel [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Of course. You will probably have to install CF again in order to use it
with Apache though.
If you're talking completely separate on a different port, you can just
install Apache. If you want CFMs on Apache sites, reinstall CF.
-Original Message-
From: Lorin Kaneff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
DNS would provide a longer delay I would think. At least if it were
unreachable. If DNS is unstable and not answering correctly
(intermittently), then perhaps that's it. I'd check to see how lookups on
the server respond (dig/nslookup) regardless. The default last I knew was
3 tries 5 seconds each.
I recall needing libarc and libm as well-
P
From: Gustavo A.
Baratto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005
1:07 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] C
compiler cannot create executables
Not legally as far as I know.
A- Have you checked out the system vitals when it hangs (cpu waits?RAM?)?
B- Have you checked db connections when it hangs?
Never say something is not a problem if you do not know what the problem
is. You may only be getting 50 hits to the thing, but it'll only take one
good one to take it down.
Is the client making typos when trying to get to the samba share?
I.e. typing "blah.blah.com/share" instead of \\blah.blah.com\share?
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 8:54 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTEC
You can pipe vhosts to their own logs.
There is no way that I know of to put this in the main config though (i.e.
servername as a variable), so you need to create CustomLog entries for each
vhost, putting the servername as an argument (or in the filename).
P
From: Jan van de
Whoops.
Go back to that site. The other packages
are there as well.
Apache2-mpm should be the apache2-worker on
the site I think.
From: Peter J Milanese
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 8:25
AM
To: 'users@httpd.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error
at inst
You
From: Andreas Bauer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:57
PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Error at installing
apache.rpm
Hello!
Installing apache rpm file:
apache2-2.0.50-7.2.i586.rpm from Suse Server: ftp://ftp.gwdg.
Open the file, save it as another name, and try it again. The header may be
corrupt or something. While many graphics apps overlook that stuff, I do not
think browsers are smart enough to do so. I assume you are sure that it is a
.gif, because if not it could just be a mime issue.
-Origin
Add it to the DirectoryIndex (search for
index.html in the httpd.conf file)
From: Beth Curotto
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005
11:28 AM
To: Apache HTTPd List
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VirtualHost
& index.htm
Is there a reason why site will only
That should do it. DNS should be good as well.
-Original Message-
From: Beth Curotto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:10 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Name-based Virtual Host
More like this?
NameVirtualHost *:80
# Virtual Host
Try adding times to the apache access log, and look for the bigger ones.
The CPU use is probably WAIT time for database access or script parsing.
-Original Message-
From: kalin mintchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:52 PM
To: Nathan Kinkade
Cc: freebsd-quest
Could be a spider.
Google, or Akmai or something... Did the directory/files exist at one
point? Their indexer checks to see if the page exists and corrects itself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:08 PM
To: users@httpd.
You are better off writing something to change all of the code
(search/replace) and make it all relative (site independent). Either that,
or just put it where it likes to be.
If you have it setup as a vhost or the site is on its own, you can just do
a redirect into the /ao/ directory, and it may
How about your error log? What does it say?
This should be no problem. Does the log dir exist?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 7:47 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CustomLog directive in containe
How about this one:
mv ao/* .
I'd figure its absolute links causing the problem after reading this a few
times. If you run a rewrite as you state, it will redirect the root only.
Meaning if you go to the site's root, it will push you to /ao/, but any
links you click (if it is not a relative site
Did you adjust all of your timeouts to allow for the upload? That is a lot
to ask of the protocol in my opinion. You should find another way to do
it.
-Original Message-
From: Harish Sundaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:42 AM
To: Apache Forum
Subject: [EMAIL
It is highly unlikely to be apache. Look into your code, and perhaps join
a group associated with this.
What is the standard 'ding' sound, and what is the error?
P
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:10 AM
To: users@httpd.
In my experience, cookies are not associated with any connection.
Normally, to ensure no cookie type session hacking, there is some sort of
encryption of variables associated with generating cookies. I have written
several such mechanisms, and would suggest the same. This way, it is
secure througho
Maxim-
Depends on what you want, how much there is, and how fast you want it.
Oh.. Also depends on whether you want it to cost anything or not.
If you want demographics and what-not, which are reliable (not whois
based), then go with something commercial since they generally maintain
some so
It should work if you precede the " " with a "\".
I.E. - Program\ Files
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 7:11 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] log rotation for apache 2.0.54 on
GFS - Global, or Google? I'm assuming Global File System.
I'm a big fan of avoiding ANY network or storage sharing. Although not
likely, if the SAN takes a hit, your screwed. A large farm of decent size
boxes, less variables.
This is coming from a controlled environment. Hosting will likely be
p
I do not know how this can be possible. Apache does not 'tell' the browser
anything unless it forwards (redirects) the request. In this case it would
be forwarding it to itself. If you 'tell' the browser something, it will
go there. There is no way to my knowledge that you can 'tell' the browser
to
Perhaps your ISP has done something to filter or slow it down (like
Packeteer or something). Perhaps is is coincidental. Do you still have the
windows box to see if it is still slow? Did you try running your webserver
on another (preferably high) port?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
Just adding a bit more experience to the pile. Hope it is useful.
(inline)-
- how to point the ftp to the right direction, since you'll have several
machines, the data won't be centralized (would the FTP server mount all
the
disks thrugh NFS (??) or would you use AFS to have a single big
dist
Bad idea with all those proxy farms out there (AOL, etc)
-Original Message-
From: Jason Czerak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 10:47 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 - Visit based connection limiting.
What I wish to accomplish is a vi
If it is fast locally (on the SUSE box), and slow on another box on the
local network, then it MAY be DNS lookups. You likely do not have a
reverse address for your local network (192.x.x.x), so it would definitely
timeout.
Were you running apache on windows, or IIS. The timeouts are probably
hand
He was referring to your SUSE box doing lookups. In the apache config,
make sure 'HostnameLookups Off' is there. I cannot even get to your site,
so I don't know the status.
Is it slow when you hit it locally (If you have X on the SUSE box)?
Default lookups timeout after 5 seconds, and default ret
Looks to me like it may still be a
permissions issue. It can’t find the file because it cannot read the
directory, and it can’t read the file so it bounces permission denied.
What user is apache(http) run as (ps –ef), and what are the permissions
of the directory? (ls –la /home/web/includes
Byron-
Please start by reading documentation. From what you are writing, it is
not clear that you have an understanding enough to ask the right
questions. Without this, you will get nothing but inconclusive responses.
Thanks-
P
-Original Message-
From: Byron Dickson [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
>> I merely stated that this would be expensive on the server side,
>No, you haven't (or you haven't provided any arguments to support this
>claim). You would not be transferring any more data than you already do.
>You would actually be transferring less because you have vastly less TCP
>connecti
>>
>> How would dynamic stuff work?
>Uuhh the same way as always?
>> What if your image is on another server farm?
>Uuhh then you use the system we already have?
Who are you talking to?
You stated "I always thought it would make a lot more sense to transfer
some or all images (and CS
>I've been thinking for almost 10 years now that HTTP is really dumb
>because it has problems like this one. I always thought it would make a
>lot more sense to transfer some or all images (and CSS and JS) within
>the same request as the containing HTML page. Then your problem would go
>away b
Your IP solution is more expensive in my opinion. It is expensive to you,
and does little to solve the problem. You are not identifying the client.
You are identifying what your server thinks the client is. BIG difference.
Especially with the oodles of NATing going on in our lovely world.
-O
More (probably too much more) on the subject...
Many browsers, and others (when the user knows a few things) can fake the
refferer, so if it is a serious problem for you, then you 'may' not
benefit from any of this.
I am drawing up a token system to try to handle this, which may be cookie
based.
46 matches
Mail list logo
