happen because max spare servers was exceeded or for any number of
other abnormal reasons (process crashing). There may be other normal
reasons such as max number of requests per child.
--
Michael Conlen
On Oct 2, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Robinson Craig wrote:
Hi,
I've recently been po
Ahh, the source of my confusion earlier.
Is this in reference to the backlog of incomplete TCP handshake
requests?
--
Michael Conlen
On Oct 1, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:45:12 -0400
"Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/1/07, Bj &
Try the server-status page.
--
Michael Conlen
On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Bj wrote:
Hi,
Does someone know how to get the number of requests pending in the
backlog ?
I didn't find interesting information in /proc/...
Regards,
Please ignore, I found large file support in 2.2.x
FM is R
--
Michael Conlen
On Sep 30, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Michael Conlen wrote:
Is it possible to transfer files larger than 2^32 bytes long using
Apache on a 32 bit system? If I have a file greater than that
length of legnth A apache
Is it possible to transfer files larger than 2^32 bytes long using
Apache on a 32 bit system? If I have a file greater than that length
of legnth A apache indicates that it's going to send [ A (mod 2^32) ]
bytes. My file is in excess of 7*2^32 bytes long.
--
Michael C
inates the connection itself.
I haven't seen the same issue with my Foundry switches.
--
Michael Conlen
On Sep 29, 2007, at 9:41 AM, Tomas Larsson wrote:
Hi group.
Not that I would be able to solve it, but I'd like to know.
Background:
One of my homepages is hosted on servage.net (www.
ry in the machine if that's what it's going to
take. Memory prices start at about $30 USD/GB right now.
--
Michael Conlen
On Sep 28, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I agree about latency and have tested for that all the
way to Europe and Asia. I did find a latency of 31ms
from
if Apache isn't necessary for anything you could serve the
static content from Tomcat and cache it in memory on the proxy.
--
Michael Conlen
On Sep 28, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I would agree except the current audience using my
portal is from all over the world so performan
dresses on the same server. All requests that should go to tomcat
goes to one host name and others go to another host name and both can
use port 80 on their respective IP addresses.
Another option is to run the servers on different ports then use a
layer 7 switch to redirect them by URL.
k the whole tree and you need to use a proper timeout but
it's much less resource intensive because it avoids forking, which
anyone who's logged in to a system without memory can tell you takes
*forever*.
--
Michael Conlen
On Sep 28, 2007, at 2:43 AM, Christian Folini wrote:
On Fr
You could just ask apache's server-status page. From there you can
also get more detailed information such as which are connected and
sending or receiving data as well as those connected but not doing
anything.
--
Michael Conlen
On Sep 27, 2007, at 11:13 PM, Robinson Craig wrote:
T
d has the process ready to go. There are httpd.conf
parameters to specify the minimum and maximum of these to keep
available.
--
Michael Conlen
On Sep 27, 2007, at 10:39 PM, Robinson Craig wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm trying to clarify my understanding of the APACHE 1.3 process model
on Solaris
I'm considering using mod_cache for a server but I haven't seen any
documentation on how the cache handles updated files. Some of the
files are updated on a semi-regular basis and the majority of it is
never updated (though may be deleted).
can someone toss me a pointer to the appropriate d
13 matches
Mail list logo
