Kind of puzzling. The problem started after doing an upgrade to Fedora
8. The web server randomly quits working. This morning it showed 5 httpd
processes running. My settings for number of servers is far higher than
that. Restarting the httpd service fails with it saying that it copuld
not bin
Running server-status and getting a lot of these. The server seems to be
under some sort of attack. What does this mean?
*40-0* 13851 0/8/118 *R* 0.14 11 31 0.0 0.05 2.11 ? ?
..reading..
*41-0* 13967 0/9/167 *R* 0.00 11 31 0.0 0.11 119.75 ? ?
..reading..
much more ;)
Regards,
Samy
Marc Perkel schrieb:
Hi Everyone,
I'm hosting a lot of domains for a lot of people who have a lot of
MySQL applications that they installed and almost all are configured
to talk to MySQL on "localhost".
In order to spread the load I'm tryi
Hi Everyone,
I'm hosting a lot of domains for a lot of people who have a lot of MySQL
applications that they installed and almost all are configured to talk
to MySQL on "localhost".
In order to spread the load I'm trying to move the MySQL server to
another machine. Since everything is config
Hi, I'm getting a lot of these when running server-status. Is this some
kind of DOS attack?
*25-0* 52500/2/22 *R* 0.002 65 0.0 0.000.40
? ? ..reading..
*26-0* 52510/0/20 *R* 0.083 46 0.0 0.007.44
? ?
Nick Kew wrote:
On 29 May 2007, at 22:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm running FC6 and added mod_security using the default rule set and
the load level on the system is about 5 times higher than without it.
I'm wondering what rule sets I might disable that would give me some
securi
I'm running FC6 and added mod_security using the default rule set and
the load level on the system is about 5 times higher than without it.
I'm wondering what rule sets I might disable that would give me some
security without slowing the server down to a crawl. Could use some
practical advice.
Sam Lavitt wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 5/16/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was hoping for a more specific answer. If I could have done that I
wouldn't be here asking how to do it.
Also consider other services, such as FTP servers, SSH, SCP, etc. etc.
etc.
Sam Lavitt wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 05:46 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
What's the best way to keep hackers out of /dev/shm? I'm getting
the script kitties installing IRC bots.
Mount /dev/shm noexec.
More importantly, close the
Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 05:46 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
What's the best way to keep hackers out of /dev/shm? I'm getting the
script kitties installing IRC bots.
Mount /dev/shm noexec.
More importantly, close the holes the script kiddies are getting
What's the best way to keep hackers out of /dev/shm? I'm getting the
script kitties installing IRC bots.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> f
Is there a way to run multiple virtual sites on one IP using different
certificates? Apache 2.2
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more in
What would cause this?
http://www.kirkevik.com/willadsen.htm
Is it a server issue or something the user is doing?
Thanks in advance.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
What causes this? Thanks in advance. Server getting a lot of timeouts
and very slow.
*51-0* 25675 0/5/95 *R* 0.00 7 15 0.0 0.07 0.90 ? ? ..reading..
*52-0* 26188 0/0/79 *R* 0.38 2 1 0.0 0.00 1.09
What causes this? Thanks in advance. Server getting a lot of timeouts
and very slow.
51-0
25675
0/5/95
R
0.00
7
15
0.0
0.07
0.90
?
?
..reading..
52-0
26188
0/0/79
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 8/10/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.2. Here's what I want to do. I want to restrict
access based on a failed reverse host lookup. For example, if the IP of
the client fails revers lookup I want then to not be able to po
I'm running Apache 2.2. Here's what I want to do. I want to restrict
access based on a failed reverse host lookup. For example, if the IP of
the client fails revers lookup I want then to not be able to post.
Can that be done?
---
Eike Frost wrote:
Hello,
On Friday 04 August 2006 18:02, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm having connection problems. Running server status 90% of the
connections look like this:
*50-0* 17499 0/8/8 *R* 0.00 0 1 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading..
What does this
I'm having connection problems. Running server status 90% of the
connections look like this:
44-0
18012
0/6/16
R
0.00
1
1
0.0
0.00
0.00
?
?
..reading..
45-0
17985
In 2.0 Apache mod spaling made the URL case insensitive. In 2.2 it
doesn't. That means that mod speling in 2.2 is broken.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/
Nick Kew wrote:
On Thursday 27 July 2006 01:16, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - So - this is a bug and needs to be fixed? You would think that an
HTTP server as popular as Apache would be able to support case
insensitive URLs.
There is no such thing as a "case insensitiv
serving method. even though
slight, it made a huge difference.
On 7/26/06, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I noticed this issue switching from IIS to Apache. My initial
research
> pointed to file names being case insensitive,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc,
I noticed this issue switching from IIS to Apache. My initial research
pointed to file names being case insensitive, but directories still
remaining case sensitive. Please let me know if you find out otherwise.
Steven.
OK - In Apache 2.0 the director
I just upgraded from 2.0 to 2.2 and there seems to be a problem. I was
using mod speling to make my sites case insensitive by that no longer is
working. How do I make Apache ignore the case of filenames?
-
The official User-To
is there a place I candownload Apache 2.2 RPMs for fedora core 4? I'm
thinking about upgrading to FC5 but I'd like to see how 2.2 works first
because I have several hundred sites and the less variables at once the
better.
-
T
Is there any Apache 2.2 RPMs for Fedora Core 4?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it solid or should I wait?
Does it use more or less memory? I've had memory issues ever since I
went 64 bit Linux on dual core athlon.
Is there some new killer must have feature?
What all does it break?
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 11/6/05, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK - how would I do this?
I'm migrating my mailman server to another computer and I'm changing the
URL and I want to redirect from the old URL to the new one. The old
server has many virtual
-->
http://mailman.churchofreality.org/*
I'm confused about how to do this and figure that someone out there has
this down.
Thanks in Advance
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http
Nick Kew wrote:
On Thursday 03 November 2005 04:39, Marc Perkel wrote:
Serious Memory Leak Problem
Last time you posted this, I asked if you'd compiled it yourself,
and you said no. Please at the very least *do that* before
complaining here. Some third-
I've asked about this before and never got an answer that solved the
problem. I used to run my server on a dual xeon computer and it was
very memory efficient. I moved to the 64 bit version of of Fedora Core
4 and now it's filling up memory really fast.
Both servers had 4 gigs of ram. And bas
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 13:44, Marc Perkel wrote:
[chop]
Did you ever tall us whether you compiled it yourself or got it
from a package?
If the latter, I suggest compiling it on and for your hardware,
in case you simply have a binary that'
David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
--On Friday, October 21, 2005 11:16 AM -0700 Marc Perkel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
I really don't know what the problem could be but let's
start a discussion:
1) How many children are there?
2)
I've had good luck using mod_speling. But before that I used a trick
where I used samba. The trick is to run samba, mount a share, then serve
from that share. Samba is case insensitive.
BTW - I agree - in fact I think it's insane to have a case sensitive
file system. But I'll never convince th
David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
--On Friday, October 21, 2005 11:16 AM -0700 Marc Perkel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
I really don't know what the problem could be but let's
start a discussion:
1) How many children are there?
2)
David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
--On Friday, October 21, 2005 11:16 AM -0700 Marc Perkel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
I really don't know what the problem could be but let's
start a discussion:
1) How many children are there?
2)
David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
I really don't know what the problem could be but let's
start a discussion:
1) How many children are there?
2) What is the sum of the processes RSS size?
3) What is the sum of the processes VSIZE size?
Thanks for your perl script. Here's the results:
102
I've asked about this before and never got an answer. I used to run my
server on a dual xeon computer and it was very memory efficient. I moved
to the 64 bit version of of Fedora Core 4 and now it's filling up memory
really fast.
Both servers had 4 gigs of ram. And basically the same configura
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I run apache 2.0.5x, and was wondering if there is a way to make URL's (after
the domain portion) case insensitive in apache (all URL's), for example:
www.foobar.com/JUNKFOOD.htm (client browser)
would be processed by httpd as:
www.foobar.com/junkfood.htm
I've asked about this before and never got an answer. I used to run my
server on a dual xeon computer and it was very memory efficient. I moved
to the 64 bit version of of Fedora Core 4 and now it's filling up memory
really fast.
Both servers had 4 gigs of ram. And basically the same configura
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - thanks for your help. I do use PHP and I don't want to crash. ;)
But - unless I keep MaxRequestsPerChild at no more than 10 the memory
usage grows fast. Could I have a memory leak of some kind?
Holey
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 19:59, Marc Perkel wrote:
My site is fairly high traffic. about 20 gigs an hour. 60 requests a
second. Apparently I'm using prefork. Do you think MPMs would be the
better choice?
Worker would reduce memory usage.
t like precompiled
binaries. I prefer to compile my own things because I feel I have more
control over things like memory and speed... as in I can compile in what I
need and not have things I don't need. :)
Thanks,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Also - reducing MaxRequestsPerChild to 10 makes a dramatic difference
in memory usage. Do I have a memory leak problem?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/us
Bill Sargent wrote:
Did you compile apache yourself?
If you did, did you strip the binary
Strip --strip-unneeded httpd
? That would make the memory footprint smaller I believe.
Stripping libphp4.so as well might save some memory.
Are you using worker mpm or prefork?
(does worker eve
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:37:16AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Kind of an odd problem but I'm moving my stuff to a new server and for
some reason Apache (2.0.54) is using a lot more memory on the new server
than on the old server.
I'm hosting the same
's quite a difference.
So - what am I missing? Why is the new server using so much more ram?
--
Marc Perkel - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
I'm having a memory usage problem and hoping I can find a solution.
I'm moving from 32 bit Fedora Core 4 to 64 bit Fedora Core 4 on a new
server. The problem is that the individual servers on the 64 bit box are
using a LOT more memory that they did on the 32 bit box. and I need to
figure out h
48 matches
Mail list logo
