Re: [us...@httpd] Meaning of apache errors

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:30:46 -0500 Eric Covener wrote: > using an Rlimit* from > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html but you're trying > to raise a limit above the max? Yes, we have Rlimits set, and that is the first thing I thought of as well. However, I am not attempting to change

[us...@httpd] Meaning of apache errors

I am still looking for the meaning of this error: (22)Invalid argument: setting of resource limits failed Anyone?? -- "The angel of history[...]is turned toward the past." (Walter Benjamin) - The official User-To-User support

[us...@httpd] (22)Invalid argument

hus violates the mem limit? It is not at all clear to me, after googling, that this error even has to do with Rlimits, and it is not mentioned in the apache docs at all. Does anyone know what it might refer to? MK -- "The angel of history[...]is turned toward th

Re: [us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts problem

Hey thanks y'all, it was the name resolution. As soon as I saw that, bells started ringing and of course the other VH's (eg, localhost) have an entry there. Thanks! - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTT

Re: [us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts problem

On 10/20/2009 11:26:45 AM, André Warnier wrote: > What do you get when you enter : > ping dev.docsearch.net > in a command window on your workstation ? On the working VH's, the ping goes thru. On the non-working one, I get "unknown host". I'm totally baffled by this. I keep staring at everyth

[us...@httpd] Virtual Hosts problem

I have two virtual hosts set-up and working at home right now. The first one is this: NameVirtualHost *:80 ServerName localhost DocumentRoot "/var/www/html/" Alias /filesystem / RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} MSIE.6 RewriteRule .m?html$

Re: [us...@httpd] redirect IE6 with mod_rewrite

On 08/03/2009 06:38:12 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > mod_rewrite shares its thoughts with you through the RewriteLog at > RewriteLogLevel (or somesuch). At level 10, it gets quite chatty and Thanks, much appreciated. - The offic

Re: [us...@httpd] redirect IE6 with mod_rewrite

On 08/02/2009 06:35:32 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > > You can't redirect to a relative path. > Yeah, that was it. Kind of peeved, tho, that even with LogLevel set to "debug" apache throws absolutely no explanation or error for this. "Your browser (or proxy) sent a request that this server coul

[us...@httpd] redirect IE6 with mod_rewrite

Okay, sorry, that was because I did not include the directive within . However, rather than redirecting, I now get a 400 Bad Request error. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

[us...@httpd] redirect IE6 with mod_rewrite

I'm trying to redirect IE6 users to a special page using mod_rewrite, since this seems to be the usual suggestion googling. I'm testing it this way to see if the method will work: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} .*Mozilla.* RewriteRule html$ error.mhtml [L] which I f

Re: [us...@httpd] Attempt to serve directory:

On 07/24/2009 09:47:00 AM, Bob Ionescu wrote: > 2009/7/17 MK : > > > >SetHandler perl-script > >PerlHandler HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler > >AddType text/html mhtml > >AddType text/html comp > >AddHandler perl-script mhtml comp > &g

[us...@httpd] apache corrupting images

This started happening this morning. I did not want to attach an image on the mail list so I posted it here: http://www.intergate.com/~halfcountplus/misc/apache-distort.jpg That's a screenshot from //localhost. If you want to see how that should look, an identical online version, where the ser

[us...@httpd] Attempt to serve directory:

I'm using mod_perl to serve "mason" pages. SetHandler perl-script PerlHandler HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler AddType text/html mhtml AddType text/html comp AddHandler perl-script mhtml comp If I load *localhost/codebank/index.html*, there is no problem. However, if I try to

Re: [us...@httpd] 2.2.10 -> 2.2.11

On 06/06/2009 07:47:35 AM, André Warnier wrote: > Taking it from here, and one tiny step at a time. > (Sorry to be httpd-101 kind of level, but it pays to be really > systematic) No, please do. I have never paid much attention to apache and am totally ignorant about it. There really seems to b

Re: [us...@httpd] 2.2.10 -> 2.2.11

I suppose that is insecure, but I am just using this on my desktop. Again, SELinux is disabled. --MK - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> f

[us...@httpd] 2.2.10 -> 2.2.11

;Allow all" should have been sufficient. What could I have overlooked? --MK - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubsc