Re: [users@httpd] Order of applicatoin of sites-enabled configs

2014-08-07 Thread M Busche
first. You can even use ServerName or ServerName in the default vhost. Frank On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:58 AM, M Busche wrote: Ooops!  Somehow I missed the "in alphabetical order" the first time I read that.  Thanks for making me read that again! > >After playing with this

Re: [users@httpd] Order of applicatoin of sites-enabled configs

2014-08-06 Thread M Busche
yet -- this is all on my test environment -- so don't be befuddled if you don't see my live machine redirecting as I claim here. Thanks, Matt On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 5:08 AM, Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:20 AM, M Busche wrote: > Hi, > I notice that the d

[users@httpd] ServerName usage

2014-08-06 Thread M Busche
Hi, If I only have ServerName declarations in the scope of my virtualhost directives, then I get a complaint at startup that apache couldn't figure out what my domain name is.  To make this warning go away, I added another ServerName entry at global scope (in apache2.conf).  But this seems wei

[users@httpd] Order of applicatoin of sites-enabled configs

2014-08-06 Thread M Busche
Hi, I notice that the default virtual host configuration file name is 000-default.conf.  I presume the convention of starting virtual host configuration file names with a three digit number governs the order in which the configurations are applied.  Can someone point me to the apache docs web p