[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_balancer question

2008-01-10 Thread KOZMAN Bálint
Hi there, has anyone seen stability problems with mod_proxy_balancer in apache 2.2.3? I'm on RHEL 5 x86_64 with httpd 2.2.3 and using mod_proxy_balancer to ditribute incoming traffic among backend apaches. Unfortunatelly front httpd randomly drops incoming connections independently from the n

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] thousands of netstat http TIME_WAIT

2008-01-10 Thread KOZMAN Bálint
Could you show some more details of your httpd config? Do you actually use keepalive, are you using mod_proxy? And a line of netstat output with TIME_WAIT could also tell more. Balint On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Randy Paries wrote: hello, I just built a new Centos 5 box with apache Server versi

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

2008-01-09 Thread KOZMAN Bálint
is a patch available which has been proposed for backport to 2.2.x. Unfortunately it currently only has one vote... well actually two if you count Jim JAGIELSKI's post to the dev list on last Dec 8. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg38927.html -ascs -Message d'origine

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

2008-01-08 Thread KOZMAN Bálint
clients. For further reading, refer to the mailing list archive for last September http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200709.mbox/thread or my Bugzilla report http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43308 -ascs -Message d'origine- De : KOZMAN Bál

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy and keepalive question

2008-01-08 Thread KOZMAN Bálint
Hi there, I'm experiencing a different behaviour of apache 2.2's mod_proxy compared to the one in 2.0. From my point of view the main difference is that 2.0 mod_proxy does not send the "Connection" request header to the backend, while 2.2 mod_proxy always sends "Connection: Close" regardles