Re: [users@httpd] Re: ssl-vhost-mixing issue

2011-02-22 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:09:14AM +0100, Hajo Locke wrote: > >> > >>Servername example.com > >>SSLCertificateFile crt1 > >> > > >> > >>Servername example.com > >>SSLCertificateFile crt2 > >> See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218#c5 It will work if you use

Re: [us...@httpd] SSLRequire "SUCCESS" but actually failure (2 possible bugs)

2010-11-05 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:42:41PM -0400, Jeff Blaine wrote: ... > [Mon Nov 01 14:50:14 2010] [error] [client xxx.xx.160.29] access > to /apps/rtsrv1dev/share/html/ failed, reason: SSL requirement > expression not fulfilled (see SSL logfile for more details) > > However, note the "SUCCESS" (bo

Re: [us...@httpd] Ssl front end proxy and Segmentation fault (11)

2010-09-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:01:56AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpye...@pdinc.us] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 22:03 > > To: users@httpd.apache.org > > Subject: [us...@httpd] Ssl front end proxy and Segmentation fault (11) > >

Re: [us...@httpd] AuthDigestDomain doesn't work

2010-09-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:45:38AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: ... > Looking around for an explanation of this, I found very little. The most I > could find was one comment > (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/357939/example-of-using-authtype-digest-to-authenticate-a-user-once-across-sub-domain

Re: [us...@httpd] OCSP-validation fails

2010-08-18 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:26:22PM +0200, Ulf Wahlqvist wrote: > CASE 1/ If I set: > SSLOCSPDefaultResponder http://ocsp.trust.telia.com > SSLOCSPOverrideResponder on > > The validation will fail with "SSL Library Error: error:2707307F:OCSP > routines:OCSP_check_validity:status too old" Presumin

[us...@httpd] Re: Dav Locks corrupting; need some troubleshooting tools

2009-10-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:27:29PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote: > [sorry for the crosspost, but not sure where this should go]. > > To answer my own question: > > got to the bottom of it; looks to me like the > lock DB is a hash of > > inode <-> locktoken > > Steps to reproduce: > > * PUT file >

[us...@httpd] Re: mod_ssl and Transfer-Encoding: chunked wastes ~58 bytes per chunk.

2009-08-20 Thread Joe Orton
CC'ing d...@. On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:26:24PM +0100, Alex Stapleton wrote: > First some background. We use Apache HTTPD 2.0 over a high-latency, > high packet loss GPRS WAN. The cost per byte is tangible. We use SSL. > We also use Transfer-Encoding: chunked sometimes. This is a machine > monito

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Browser handling of 413 Request Entity Too Large

2008-04-17 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:01:52PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: > Hi all, running into this on an old Apache 2.0.46 installation > (actually httpd-2.0.46-70.ent from RHEL 3 Update 9). > > When a user attempts to upload a large file it's exceeding the > LimitRequestBody size and Apache returns a 41

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return of bug 14219 in version 2.2.8? (too many SSL VHs causes fopen to fail) - UNDERSTOOD (?)

2008-04-04 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:52:15AM +0200, Boyle Owen wrote: ... > As an aside, our apache listens on 88 ports and has 102 piped log files > to write to. Add on STDIN/OUT/ERR and the Pid and Lock files and that's > how we get to 195. Comparing the two versions, we see the only > difference is in the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error --with-dbm=gdbm, version 2.0.59

2006-12-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote: > I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries: > httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors > on the same machine. > > I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as > w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache start segmentation fault: EMLINK (Too many links)

2006-12-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:36:35AM +0100, alex handle wrote: > Hi! > > Yesterday i migrated an old webserver (Apache 1.3.34, FreeBSD 5.2.1) to > Apache 2.2.3 and FreeBSD 6.1. > > The configuration consists of 776 vhost. > After importing the vhosts.conf file i did a "apachectl configtest" and it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.3 build issue

2006-11-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:56:56AM -0500, Gary D. Margiotta wrote: ... > The compile worked fine the first time on the same VM image, but now on > subsequent builds can't seem to get past this part. I'm looking for any > cruft in the system which may have been left over from any previous > comp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compiling Apache 2.2.3 - SuSe 10.1 64 bits

2006-11-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 12:56:12PM -0300, Rodolfo wrote: > Does anyone know how to solve it ? I receive the following message after I > comand the make ... > /usr/lib/libexpat.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Try running "rpm --erase expat-dev

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 and 'File Descriptor Limits'

2006-09-27 Thread Joe Orton
The SLACK_LINE stuff was about preserving low-numbered fds for use by stdio because of the Solaris 8-bit fd limit with stdio. It's not in 2.x because 2.x doesn't use stdio for logging. If you're hitting fd limits in 2.2 it is only because of kernel fd limits which need fixing with limit/ulimit

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd: fatal: hardware capability unsupported

2006-05-24 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:11:34PM -0300, Felipe Tocchetto wrote: > > httpd > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/httpd-2.0.58 --enable-ssl > --with-ssl=/usr/local/openssl-0.9.8b ... > bash-3.00# ./httpd -k start > ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: hardware capability unsupported: 0x1000 [ SSE2 ] > Killed It's

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [error] (9)Bad file descriptor: apr_socket_accept: (client socket)

2006-05-22 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 05:32:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've spent hours googling and asked about this error message on a PHP list > and was directed here. > > Every time I gracefully restart Apache 2.2.2, the error log reports: > > [Thu May 18 19:59:29 2006] [notice] Graceful rest

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache with SSL

2006-05-18 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:07:59AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > Anyone - when I try starting Apache directly (outsie of samon using: > apachectl sslstart) I get the error: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache]$ ./bin/apachectl sslstart > /oap//blogsdev/blogs_as3/apache/bin/httpd: error while loading sh

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large files

2006-05-11 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:58:15AM -0400, Mike VanHorn wrote: > > I have compiled and built 2.0.58, but I am still getting the same error: > > (79)Value too large for defined data type > > I'd been checking and LFS was supposedly fixed in 2.0.53, so why am I > getting this error? I'm on Solari

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Segmentation fault when calling ldap_connect from PHP page

2006-04-26 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:17:34AM +, Conor Murphy wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to connect to an LDAP server from a PHP page. > If I use the php cli to execute the page, > everything works okay. However, when I access the same page > through httpd, I get a blank response and the > error_log c

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] possible memory leak in line ending conversion?

2006-03-08 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:17:42AM -0500, Charlie Cook wrote: > Before submitting this to bugzilla, I wanted to see if > anyone else has run across this and found a solution. I didn't run > across anything in the archives, but it could have been my search > word choices. We are seeing

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RADIUS and Subversion config

2006-03-08 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:45:58AM -0500, David Heppenstall wrote: > I'm having some problems configuring Apache while serving Subversion > Repositories in conjunction with RADIUS authentication. There is an age-old bug in mod_auth_radius which causes spurious 404 errors with pretty much any use

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Images / files partially loading?

2006-02-23 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 05:05:35PM -0800, Evan Platt wrote: > Here's the situation, I've looked in the faq, not sure what wording to > use, so that could partially be my problem... One solution I found was to > enable Enable SendFile Off, that didn't help.. > > Here's the setup: > 6.0 mbps/600k DS

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 seems to have problems with CIFS mounted filesystems

2006-02-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:49:52AM -0800, Tim Garton wrote: > Ok, I took Joe's advice. You can find the strace at: > http://staff.hightechhigh.org/~tgarton/httpd.strace.gz > > The other info you asked for is: > Linux distro - Slackware 10.1 > CPU arch - x86(Pentium III) > glibc version - 2.3.2 T

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 seems to have problems with CIFS mounted filesystems

2006-02-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:43:12PM -0800, Tim Garton wrote: > Has anyone else run into anything like this? Just upgraded to Apache > 2.2.0 on a linux box running 2.6.10 kernel. This machine mounts some > windows shares via CIFS (eg. mount -t cifs //windowsfs/share > /local/mount/point) For so

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL in Apache 2.2.0

2006-02-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >I can't reproduce any problems here using your config. For the > >configuration with "SSLEngine On" in global context, where the server > >silently fails to start u

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL in Apache 2.2.0

2006-02-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:07:07PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > > > >You need "SSLEngine on" somewhere. What error was produced from > >apachectl? How did it fail to start? There aren't any errors in the > >error_log you posted. &

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cannot startup apache in RHEL AS 4.

2006-02-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 03:30:43PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am not able to start up httpd in RHEL AS 4. > > The error I get is as follows. > Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 190 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: > > Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk.so into server: > /etc/httpd/m

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL in Apache 2.2.0

2006-02-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:54:18PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > CustomLog /var/log/apache/httpd-ssl_request.log \ > "%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \"%r\" %b" > > If I set here (globally) SSLEngine optional or on, Apache didn't even > start, and I get this in the error log: You

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sumbol multiple-defined when compiling httpd 2.2.0 on Solaris 8

2006-02-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote: > thanks but I don't seem to be able to apply the patch (on a fresh > httpd-2.2.0 directory) > > mena.[root]# cd httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr > mena.[root]# patch -p1 < apr-1.2.2-random.patch > Looks like a unified context diff. > Hunk #1

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dual SAN certificate support

2006-02-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:08:19AM -0600, Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote: > Event Type: Error > Event Source: Service Control Manager > Event Category: None > Event ID: 7024 > Date: 2/2/2006 > Time: 8:20:18 AM > User: N/A > Computer: UNDERDOG

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sumbol multiple-defined when compiling httpd 2.2.0 on Solaris 8

2006-02-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:52:37PM +0100, Nico De Ranter wrote: > I'm trying to compile httpd 2.2.0 on Solaris 8. When I do 'make > install' it stops with the following error messages: > > === > [..] > /usr/root/web/httpd-2.2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] double wild card ssl certificates

2006-02-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:56:38PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On 2/3/06, Khai Doan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My company has a wild card SSL server certificate *.domain.com . However we > > need to use double wild card certificate *.*.domain.com. > > > > Can I use *.domain.com (which is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dual SAN certificate support

2006-02-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:20:42PM -0600, Savage, Robert CTR USTRANSCOM J6 wrote: > Acronym defined: SAN = Subject Alternative Name > Certificate contains two FQDN entries, one an alias to the other: > DNSName: fully.qualified.name > DNSName: alias-of.qualified.name > What I got back

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.55 SSL and POST problem

2006-01-31 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:42:27PM +, Stephen Collyer wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:34:27PM +, Stephen Collyer wrote: > > > >>I have an SSL enabled Apache 2.0.55, with a CGI enabled > >>Location accessible via SSL. > >>

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.55 SSL and POST problem

2006-01-31 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:34:27PM +, Stephen Collyer wrote: > I have an SSL enabled Apache 2.0.55, with a CGI enabled > Location accessible via SSL. > > When I try to execute a POST against this location, I get > a 405 "Method not allowed" response. This is http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] php_admin_flag question

2006-01-20 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:13:00PM -0600, Graham Frank wrote: > I am trying to restrict a open_basedir to the document root of the domain. > So I have the following in httpd.conf. > > > php_admin_value open_basedir / > open_basedir takes a filesystem path, that directive has no effect at all

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Solaris SIGBUS and core on changes to mmap'd files

2006-01-20 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:08:21PM -, Matt Willsher wrote: > I have a set up where by Apache serves static content from an NFS share. > This works ok most of the time but we have been getting occasional BUS > signals, resulting in core dump, when reading files. This apparently occurs > because

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] file size limitation?

2006-01-13 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:41:11AM -0500, Chris Purcell wrote: > Is there a maximum file size limitation in Apache where you cannot > download files over 4GB?I have both an Apache 1.3.29 server and an > Apache 2.2.0 server with the same files on them. One file is 4.2GB and > the other is 5GB.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Odd SSI SegFaults using 2.0.55

2006-01-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:27:03PM -0600, Josh Trutwin wrote: > I had a request to enable SSI on one of the domains I manage on a > 2.0.55 server (built from source) on Debian Linux. > > SSI behavior can only be described as "odd". ... > I verified the existence and permission of all files. This

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having trouble installing Apache 2.2.0 on SUSE LINUX version 9

2006-01-05 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:07:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > expat-devel.i386 is not installed on the system. And the expat 1.95.7-37.1 > and the expat-32bit all seem to have quite a large number of running > programs that depend on them being installed. You don't need the 32-bit expat-de

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having trouble installing Apache 2.2.0 on SUSE LINUX version 9

2006-01-05 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:32:24AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am trying to install Apache Server on a SUSE LINUX Version 9 machine. > The machine is X86_64. ... > pr_ldap_option.lo misc/apr_reslist.lo misc/apr_rmm.lo misc/apu_version.lo > misc/apr_queue.lo misc/apr_date.lo uri/apr_uri.lo >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.0 SSL build issues: multiple definition of`SHA256_Update'

2006-01-04 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 09:28:24AM -0700, Brian Kosick wrote: ... > make[4]: Entering directory > `/var/build/edg-bali/Build/edg/edg-build/httpd.2.2.0/src/httpd-2.2.0/support' > /var/build/edg-bali/Build/edg/edg-build/httpd.2.2.0/src/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr/libtool > --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd installation on hp-ux 11.11 pa-risc2.0-64bit

2005-12-20 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:27:14AM -0500, Boys Santos wrote: > Joe, > > Thanks for taking this question. Configure was ran as follows: > > export CFLAGS="+DD64" > ./configure Can you try instead: unset CFLAGS export CC="cc +DD64" ./configure and see if that works? If not, does it work

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd installation on hp-ux 11.11 pa-risc2.0-64bit

2005-12-19 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:39:10AM -0500, Boys Santos wrote: > I am trying to install httpd version 2.2.0 on an hp-ux 11.11 > pa-risc2.0-64bit box. > > Following is the error from make: > >/bin/sh /tmp/httpd-2.2.0/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc > - > Ae +Z +DAportable -mt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.1.9 - core_output_filter: writing data to the network errors, when downloading large files

2005-12-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 12:42:00PM -0800, Cletus Murphy wrote: > It appears that when a user downloads a file over 5G, the download > fails. - I'm seeing the following error's in the logfile: > > (104)Connection reset by peer: core_output_filter: writing data to the network > (32)Broken pipe: core

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem when mixing NameVirtualHost + non with SSL - "Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found?!"

2005-12-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:16:03PM +, Nick Burch wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Nick Burch wrote: > >The config is still a bit complex, but it's getting there > > OK, config is attached. Drop it into a largely fresh /etc/apache2/ > > Three of the private keys are encrypted, all with the passwo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem when mixing NameVirtualHost + non with SSL - "Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found?!"

2005-12-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:59:21PM +, Nick Burch wrote: > >From this, I see all my vhosts are defined, and correctly set for SSL/not > SSL. During the loading iteration, it loads one certificate+key fine. Then > it loads the second. After that, no more vhosts are checked! > > It seems theref

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another apache 2.2 configure question

2005-12-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:17:46PM +0100, Alexander Stoll wrote: > Hi there, > the configure-option "--disable-ipv6" seems no longer properly supported, > during build libtool fails on a undefined symbol "sock_is_ipv6" in > "libapr-1.so". > > Is this a bug or is this configure option not supporte

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd-2.2.0 on FreeBSD 6 working... one small message, though

2005-12-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 11:40:05AM -0500, Joe Apache wrote: > ok I remove all traces of APR and it works! Now I have this message: > > [Wed Dec 07 12:37:09 2005] [warn] (2)No such file or directory: Failed > to enable the 'httpready' Accept Filter This is a harmless warning and should probab

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compile httpd-2.2.0 on FreeBSD 6

2005-12-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:59:23PM -0500, Joe Apache wrote: > > >> server/.libs/libmain.a(exports.o)(.data+0xae0): undefined reference to > >> `apr_memcache_stats' > >> > > > > Where did you get your version of apr from? The bundled version doesn't > > include apr_memcache. > > > > > I ins

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] compiling apache 2.2 with openldap on solairs 9

2005-12-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:39:49AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > Configure options to Apache > > ./configure --with-ldap-sdk=openldap --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl > --enable-authnz-ldap --enable-ldap --with-ldap=/usr/local Don't pass an argument to --with-ldap, try, e.g.: --w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache errors

2005-12-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:52:02PM -0500, Ken Murach wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm relatively new to apache and was wondering what do these errors mean?? > > [Thu Dec 01 16:45:12 2005] [warn] (128)Network is unreachable: connect to > listener on [::]:80 Upgrading to 2.0.55 should fix this. > [

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with multiple SSIs

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 07:42:27PM -0800, Paul Kippes wrote: > But I get the empty response when I change the file to this: > > HTML: > PHP: > HTML: > > Any ideas where I'm going wrong? Is this a possible Apache bug? Or > just some incorrect setting? It's a PHP issue... try upgrading to PHP

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 start_ssl - missing symbol

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:27:52PM +, Stephen Collyer wrote: > httpd is linking against libcrypto 0.9.7 in /usr/lib which is > missing the symbol in question. So now the question is why did > my configure not force linking against my local copy of 0.9.8a ? ... > Is -with-ssl not supported anymo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 start_ssl - missing symbol

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:58:42AM +, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sunday 27 November 2005 11:42, Stephen Collyer wrote: > > Stephen Collyer wrote: > > > Joe Orton wrote: > > >> In 2.0.x you can't build mod_ssl as a DSO against OpenSSL if OpenSSL > >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_html question

2005-11-26 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:22:56AM +0100, Joost de Heer wrote: > Hello, > > I have a mod_proxy_html question: This is not a support forum for mod_proxy_html, you might be better off contacting Nick directly. Regards, joe - Th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2 start_ssl - missing symbol

2005-11-26 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:57:11AM +, Stephen Collyer wrote: > When I start Apache, I get this: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ bin/apachectl startssl > >Syntax error on line 251 of /usr/local/apache2-ssl/conf/httpd.conf: > >Cannot load /usr/local/apache2-ssl/modules/mod_ssl.so into server: > >/usr/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [warn] (99)Cannot assign requested address: connect to listener on [::]:443

2005-11-24 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:29:24AM -0600, Joe A wrote: > noone has seen this before? If you're building from tarballs, update to 2.0.54 or later; if you're using Fedora, run "yum update" and there's a specific fix for a problem in the Fedora httpd package which caused this. joe > > On 10/26/0

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] how to turn off ssl debug log

2005-11-24 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:24:18PM +0800, jiesheng zhang wrote: > Hi, > My system is suse 9.3, apache 2.0 and mod_ssl. > The /var/log/apache2/error_log has lots of ssl debug information such as > this > --- > [Thu Nov 10 22:55:48 2005] [debug] ssl_engine_io.c(1593): | 01d0: d6

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy buffers chunked data...

2005-11-24 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:42:54AM -0800, inder sabharwal wrote: > I have a server that sends data using Transfer-Encoding: Chunked, but > mod_proxy is buffering up the data until it hits the internal limit of > 8K. Our client application expects to receive data from the server over > a period

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache stops/freezes before "Digest: done"

2005-11-24 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:49:31PM +0100, Joel CARNAT wrote: ... > [warn] NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts > [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... Pass "--with-devrandom=/dev/urandom" to configure when you build the server (or when you build APR, if you do that

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help with Digest Authentication

2005-11-02 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:33:32AM -0500, Leo Papadopoulos wrote: > Dear httpd-users and Joshua: > > Here is the information Joshua asked for. > > The httpd.conf file is configured with: In your first post you said you had: AuthName "private area" which is it really using? The string confi

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why wont apache start with this httpd.conf?

2005-10-14 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:38:22PM +0200, Søren Neigaard wrote: > I have a strange problem on Fedora Core 4. I have edited my httpd.conf, > and now apache will not start when i use the /etc/init.d/httpd script, > but if do a configtest it says ok, and if i start apache manually with > /usr/sbin/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Error with ssl and php4

2005-10-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:46:13PM +, Com Puter wrote: > The openssl libraries are installed and can be verified with a static > version of mod-ssl compiled in by checking the output of: > > lsof |grep libssl > > which returns several apache2 processes having /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7 > open

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only 64k per file downloading from my webserver

2005-10-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:21:43PM -0500, William Rowe wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > >On 10/9/05, Ashley Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Two minutes of research came up with this, which shows two workarounds > >and a patch to fix the problem: > >http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dumping core

2005-10-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:51:20AM +0100, binoj johny wrote: > Iam working on apache 2.0.47 with ssl and reverse > proxy in AIX 5.2.Everything is working fine but apache > is dumping core in a regular basis.THe dumping of sore > is less during the night time but in peak hours it > will be 2 times

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0: Recommended Mutex types for Solaris 8,9,10

2005-10-06 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:36:45PM +0200, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > Joe, > > Thanks for replying to my post. > > Isn't the AcceptMutex only used inside the parent process to serialise > the access to the accept(2) system call ? It's used in *children* to do that, yes. > Is your comment

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0: Recommended Mutex types for Solaris 8,9,10

2005-10-05 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote: > As far as I can tell, in Apache versions 2.0.49 and prior the default > Mutex type (at least for AcceptMutex) was pthread. It then changed to > fcntl around Apache 2.0.50 leading me to post the following > http://issues.e

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache - High Memory Usage Problem - HELP!

2005-09-27 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:37:16AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > Kind of an odd problem but I'm moving my stuff to a new server and for > some reason Apache (2.0.54) is using a lot more memory on the new server > than on the old server. > > I'm hosting the same web sites and (I think) I have all t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.0.48 Illegal instruction & Segmentation fault issues

2005-09-27 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 07:36:34PM -0700, Jignesh Badani wrote: ... > [Mon Sep 26 18:25:45 2005] [notice] child pid 326 exit signal Illegal > instruction (4) > > The management is wanting to know the cause and so do I. What is the best > way to debug this ? I know we could upgrade to the latest

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to disable buffering in an Apache proxy server?

2005-09-27 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:25:17PM +0200, Klaus Ebbe Grue wrote: > Hi, > > Can you help with a hint for this scenario: > > * If Apache is used as an http reverse proxy, > * if it relays a response from a backend server to a client, > * if the response is in HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding, > *

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug: apache/mod_svn intermittently creates transaction dirs with incorrect permissions or ownership such that the transaction breaks.

2005-09-20 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:29:02AM -0400, John Duprey wrote: > I'm seeing strange behavior with an apache module (Subversion's > mod_svn). Subversion commits through mod_svn are intermittently > failing because files and/or directories are being created with ROOT > ownership!! or permissions such

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please!! OSX/Unix 1.3 -> 2.0 start from scratch ( Uninstall remove)

2005-09-19 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:56:20PM +1000, Haali Goodsell wrote: > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating Makefile > ./config.status: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Something went wrong here. Try it again, and try using the latest version, 2.0.54. joe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 and large file support

2005-09-16 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:03:46PM -0700, Charles E. Heizer wrote: > Hello, > I'm running RHEL WS 4.0 and I'm trying to compile apache to support > files over 2gig. I go through the compile and everything seems to be > OK, but large file support never seems to get enabled. Can someone > pleas

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ErrorDocumet segfault w/ php

2005-09-09 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:08:31PM -0700, Jason Morehouse wrote: > ErrorDocument 404 /404.php ... > server error_log: > [Thu Sep 08 21:11:32 2005] [notice] child pid 2102 exit signal > Segmentation fault (11) > > If I change the ErrorDocument to a plain html file it works fine. If I > go direct

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug or Feature : global SSLVerifyClient in overrides the same in ?

2005-08-31 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:23:16AM +0200, Yefym Dmukh wrote: > >SSLVerifyClient is documented as working in directory context, so it > should also work in context. The manual page for mod_ssl does > >explicitly say that a SSL renegotiation is triggered if a request for the > location is receive

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug or Feature : global SSLVerifyClient in overrides the same in ?

2005-08-30 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 03:52:11PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:23:16AM +0200, Yefym Dmukh wrote: > > >SSLVerifyClient is documented as working in directory context, so it > > should also work in context. The manual page for mod_ssl does > > &g

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug or Feature : global SSLVerifyClient in overrides the same in ?

2005-08-30 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:23:16AM +0200, Yefym Dmukh wrote: > >SSLVerifyClient is documented as working in directory context, so it > should also work in context. The manual page for mod_ssl does > >explicitly say that a SSL renegotiation is triggered if a request for the > location is receive

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does Apache use up all my memory?

2005-08-18 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:48:26PM -0400, George Adams wrote: > Joe, I just wanted to thank you again. The byterange patch you gave me > worked just beautifully. Great, thanks for the feedback. I've proposed this for backport to the 2.0.x branch now so it should show up in a 2.0.x release even

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does Apache use up all my memory?

2005-08-17 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:12:05PM -0400, George Adams wrote: > >> Joe> Are these all simple static files, or is /out/ handled by some CGI > >> Joe> script etc? > >> > >> Joe, you're right - they do get passed through a Perl script for > >> processing. However, unless I'm mistaken, I don't THINK t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does Apache use up all my memory?

2005-08-15 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:00:02AM -0400, George Adams wrote: > Thanks, Joe and Jon for your helpful thoughts regarding my Apache > memory problem. Here's some more information: > > Joe> > 1-015823W 0.001742573500GET /out/388.mp3 > Joe> > 2-0 15824 W 0.00 1742573499 GET /out/2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authentication on Solaris fails when password > 8 chars and using MD5 encoded passwords (or digest)

2005-08-11 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:24:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When replacing getpass() with getpassphrase() on Solaris (does the same but > with passwords up to 256 chars) all works fine but this is not a portable > solution I guess. > Another option would be truncating the password that the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does Apache use up all my memory?

2005-08-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:05:49AM -0400, George Adams wrote: > I have an Apache 2.0.54 server on a Gentoo Linux (2.6.11) box which has > 1Gig RAM and an additional 1Gig swap space. The server handles a lot of > people downloading sermons from our church website (which are no larger > than 18Me

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Memory consumption

2005-08-03 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:49:59PM +0200, Kamil Srot wrote: > Joshua Slive wrote: > >Indeed you have found the problem, I believe: Range headers. In order > >to handle out-of-order range requests (which are allowed by the spec), > >httpd must buffer the entire response. Of course, that is very ba

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem logging SIGTERM to ErrorLog when piping to rotatelogs

2005-07-22 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:06:37AM -0400, Craft, Wesley wrote: > This is a strange problem when using rotate logs. We have multiple > apache servers running and the one without rotatelogs being piped to > from the ErrorLog directive reports the following in the error log when > shutting down: > >

Re: [users@httpd] file size error? But I don't have a file this big...

2005-07-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:58:22PM -0700, Dan Trainor wrote: > Jason Czerak wrote: > > Wed Jul 06 16:25:18 2005] [notice] child pid 24242 exit signal File size > > limit exceeded (25) > > [Wed Jul 06 16:27:00 2005] [notice] child pid 24368 exit signal File > > size limit exceeded (25) > > [Wed Jul

Re: [users@httpd] Large File Support in Apache 1.3.33

2005-07-07 Thread Joe Orton
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:10:42AM +1000, Dan Goodes wrote: > Hi Folks > > I remember reading somewhere that Apache 1.3.33 supposedly supports large > files >2G on 32-bit systems. However I'm not having much success. No, this won't work in 1.3 since 1.3 uses "long" to represent file sizes. This

Re: [users@httpd] Segmentation Fault on starting httpd 2.0.48

2005-06-21 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 10:19:35AM -0500, Jerry Rehak wrote: > Hello- > > I get a segfault when starting httpd. I'm using apache 2.0.48 built > from tar running on Fedora C3. Upgrade to 2.0.54, it's a known bug in 2.0.48. > (gdb) run > Starting program: /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd > [Thread deb

Re: [users@httpd] very bizarre "(13)Permission denied" problem

2005-06-20 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:29:31AM -0500, Martin, Jeremy wrote: > Hi, > > We are having an odd problem with certain files showing up as "access > denied" "403 forbidden" in Apache2, CentOS 4 (based on RHES4), PHP5, but > this is not a PHP related problem specifically.. For example, the file > "bad

Re: [users@httpd] Alias and user directories gives 403 errors

2005-05-20 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:12:14AM +0100, Andrew Walmsley wrote: > I'm trying to duplicate a server setup from one machine running Redhat > 9.0 and Apache 2.0.44 to a machine running > Red Hat Enterprise 2.6.9-5.0.5.Elsmp and Apache 2.0.52 > > The machine was setup, and Apache test page works corr

Re: [users@httpd] Mysterious intermittent apache2 crashes (not sure how to investigate)

2005-05-18 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:56:19PM -0400, Shaun Fanning wrote: > Hi, I am running apache2 with mod_php (php 4.3.9) on RedHat ES on a dual > processor x86 box. It is running with prefork MPM to avoid any > multi-threading issues with PHP. Several times over the last month, apache > has died when our

Re: [users@httpd] Accessing a usage directory

2005-05-17 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:24:53PM -0700, Mike McMullen wrote: > I am running Apache 2.0.52 on FC3. With the FC3 installation > comes a web log analyzer called webalizer. It stores it's information > in a directory called usage in /var/www. You access it by the index.html > file it creates there. >

Re: [users@httpd] Filtering/Interception Error log strings

2005-05-16 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 12:45:48PM +0530, Jaspreet Singh wrote: > hey, > > On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:25 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:06:30PM +0530, Jaspreet Singh wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > I want to use apache

Re: [users@httpd] Filtering/Interception Error log strings

2005-05-13 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:06:30PM +0530, Jaspreet Singh wrote: > hi, > > I want to use apache to support 2000+ virt-hosts and log errors > seperately for each virt-host. > > But apache opens and maintains fd's for each error_log and access_log. > And hence the select syscall ( which has a fd_se

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Possible bug in httpd-2.1.3-beta mod_proxy_balancer (URL arguments omitted)

2005-05-09 Thread Joe Orton
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 08:03:28PM -0400, Dave O'Hair wrote: > I may have found a bug in httpd-2.1.3-beta mod_proxy_balancer. Or more > likely I just don't have it configured properly. Here's the entries > from httpd.conf: ... > The proxy/balance thing works great until I pass this URL to Apache: