[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCE] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.63 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.63 Released January 23, 2025 The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.63 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_hcheck module uses HTTP 1.0 protocol

This was just added to trunk; I will propose a back port to 2.4.x soon! > On Aug 24, 2022, at 3:14 PM, Mike Scinto wrote: > > We have a client using the mod proxy health check module which is failing > because the healthcheck end point we are hitting does not accept HTTP 1.0 > requests or olde

Re: [users@httpd] Programmatic access to balancer manager

All the balancer manager does is create HTTP requests to the Apache web server, so you can easier use the shell and curl for example to automate a lot of stuff. It is true that a formal API isn't documented (I should get on that... it *is* long overdue) but it is easy to determine it via looking

Re: [users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

Yes it is. > On Sep 23, 2020, at 3:15 AM, Kapil Awate > wrote: > > Hi All, > > We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is > backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? > > Thanks, > Kapil > > This email and any attachments thereto may

[users@httpd] Your Apache HTTPD story

The CFP (Call For Papers) for ApacheCon NA 2020 is now open, and one major topic will be regarding the one project that started it all: Apache httpd. I am coordinating the Apache httpd track, and I am encouraging not only developers but more importantly USERS of the Apache web server to submit a

Re: [users@httpd] How to keep httpd balancer scoreboard persistant when MaxConnectionsPerChild set to non-zero?

I'm not exactly sure what you mean... could you give more detail in what exactly is happening and I'd be glad to take a look. > On Mar 11, 2019, at 9:27 AM, Chen, Mengchang > wrote: > > Hi, > > I am facing this issue that when MaxConnectionsPerChild set to non-zero, the > httpd balancer sc

Re: [users@httpd] Can apache http server handle millions of static pages or pictures ?

It's most likely better to just use mod_cache... > On Nov 2, 2018, at 10:45 AM, Darryl Philip Baker > wrote: > > I'm not absolutely sure about millions but I have a few hundred thousand > pages. The two issues that might be a problem is the filesystem speed of your > implementation and the pa

Re: [users@httpd] Reverse Proxy for Web Application (or adding it as extension to Apache web server)

> On Sep 8, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Osman Zakir wrote: > > If Apache can't pass environment variables to proxied servers One way to do this is to pass the envars as parsable HTTP request headers to the backend.

Re: [users@httpd] IPv6 in mod_status scoreboard

I've changed the trunk patch to something backportable for 2.4.x. I've proposed it for the next release > On Aug 1, 2018, at 3:30 AM, Markus Wollny wrote: > > Hi, > > I am currently using Apache 2.4.25 from Debian Stretch on our > webservers. As IPv6 becomes increasingly a popular, the truncati

Re: [users@httpd] Apache load balancer, etc

Are you using the latest Apache httpd 2.4.x? Are you using the Event MPM? Both our and independent 3rd party benchmarks show Apache as fast and, at times, even faster, than those solutions you mentioned. > On Jul 2, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Rose, John B wrote: > > Have been comparing Apache load bal

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCE] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.29 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.29 Released October 23, 2017 The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.29 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4

Re: [users@httpd] mod_lua and subprocess_env

Maybe this would be better discussed on dev@ ?? > On Jul 13, 2017, at 9:21 AM, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > > Yann? Is it a good time now? 🙂 > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Andrei Ivanov > wrote: > Hi, > Seeing that 2.4.26 was released, is this a good time? 😀 > > Thanks again. > > On Sun, Ma

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.27 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.27 Released July 11, 2017 The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.27 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x br

[users@httpd] CVE-2017-7659: mod_http2 null pointer dereference

CVE-2017-7659: mod_http2 null pointer dereference Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: httpd 2.4.24 (unreleased) httpd 2.4.25 Description: A maliciously constructed HTTP/2 request could cause mod_http2 to dereference a NULL pointer and crash the server

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCE] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.26 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.26 Released June 19, 2017 The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.26 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new

Re: [users@httpd] Apache log analyzer?

It would be nice to reboot Analog, which has always been my goto. In fact, I even booted up a Github repo (https://github.com/jimjag/analog) where I was going to start fixing and adding things. > On Apr 28, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Scott Birl wrote: > >> From: Rose, John B [mailto:jbr...@utk.edu] >>

Re: [users@httpd] Apache load balancing based on http request body content

Yeah... if really required, sticky sessions are the quickest way... As Nick sez, having to parse the payload slows things way down. > On Mar 9, 2017, at 7:48 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 12:26 +, Chen, Yongcheng wrote: >> Yes, http Post method with XML Text in http body. > >

Re: [users@httpd] Apache load balancing based on http request body content

In the body of the request? Ala in POST data? > On Mar 9, 2017, at 6:50 AM, Chen, Yongcheng > wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am using Apach httpd for loadbalaning. Now, i want to forward all the > requests with an expected string in xml in http body to the same backend > server. For example: >

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Crashing Everyday

4249 > > > fb: fb.com/eROI > > > > > > > > >> On Mar 1, 2017, at 8:35 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> If you can, I would upgrade to httpd 2.4.x... If you must >> stay w/ 2.2.x, then Worker might be more reliable for you >> tha

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Crashing Everyday

; > We are using Apache 2.2.23 > We will try to install Event MPM and will check. > Thanks > Jay > > > > On Mar 1, 2017 5:05 PM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: > You should not be using prefork unless you really, really need to. > > Assuming you are running

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Crashing Everyday

You should not be using prefork unless you really, really need to. Assuming you are running 2.4.x, I would strongly suggest running the Event MPM. Your Timeout and KeepAliveTimeout values are also way too big; I'd recommend 5 and 2, respectively. > On Mar 1, 2017, at 4:19 AM, Jayaram Ponnusamy

Re: [users@httpd] Copyright notices in httpd source files

I didn't know you guys were working on it. Cool. I had been working the donation angle for awhile and finally got approval so wanted to get it in quick! :) > On Dec 29, 2016, at 3:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > Cc: dev list. Looks like a catch? > > On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 17:44 -0500, Christopher Sc

Re: [users@httpd] HTTPD 2.4.25 crash in mod_proxy (ajp)

> On Dec 22, 2016, at 4:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > I tried on Solaris with 2.4.25, default config plus snippet from Konstantin > plus loading of mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp and I do not see a crash there. > So it seems to be either platform specific or the reproduction scenario is > more c

Re: [users@httpd] HTTPD 2.4.25 crash in mod_proxy (ajp)

H... I wonder if it's due to: /* Step Two: Make the Connection */ -if (ap_proxy_connect_backend(scheme, backend, worker, r->server)) { +if (ap_proxy_check_connection(scheme, backend, r->server, 0, + PROXY_CHECK_CONN_EMPTY) +

Re: [users@httpd] ssl offloading behind a proxy

Why not put all accesses in a single log, with an extra tag on whether or not it was via SSL/HTTPS? > On Dec 16, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Miguel González > wrote: > > Nobody? > > On 12/11/16 7:45 PM, Miguel González wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I am using Apache to offload SSL to non-ssl Apache runnin

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_balancer and multiple (dynamic) backends?

The page is just one way to do it... It is just an interface to the series of GETs required. I use it w/ curl all the time. > On Dec 15, 2016, at 3:11 AM, Kristian Rink wrote: > > Hi there; > > and thanks for your feedback. :) > > Am Mittwoch, den 14.12.2016, 07:43 -0500

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_balancer and multiple (dynamic) backends?

I think that balancer-manager is exactly what you are looking for. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/howto/reverse_proxy.html#manager Cheers! > On Dec 14, 2016, at 4:57 AM, Kristian Rink wrote: > > Folks; > > unsure whether this is the right place to ask and whether this is possible to > be

Re: [users@httpd] Health Check is not working, always shows a node up.

There is an issue w/ the health check URL not being copied in some VirtualHost environments. This bug has been squashed and fixed in 2.4.24 should will be out within 2 weeks. > On Nov 10, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Vladimir L wrote: > > I am testing with 3backend nodes, 1st returns 404, the third is not

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 support removed for Tandem

Official support for Apache httpd for a number of "old" platforms has been removed, but it is likely that it builds and runs anyway, depending on how Posix-like the platform is. > On Nov 3, 2016, at 1:28 AM, Hemant Chaudhary > wrote: > > Hi > > I am planning to build Apache 2.4.23 on Nonstop,

[users@httpd] Using memcached w/ socache

Before I start digging into the code to try to figure this out, has anyone use the memcache socache module to use memcached as the backend storage for mod_cache? I'm trying to figure out exactly *how* to configure this... I'm guessing it's something like CacheEnable socache CacheSocache memca

Re: [users@httpd] Round Robin LoadBalance/Failover Configuration for Apache WebServers

From the below, it seems you are using mod_jk for your connectivity to Tomcat. mod_jk is part of the Tomcat project, not Apache httpd, and so your question would be better asked on the Tomcat users list. Good luck! > On Oct 12, 2016, at 1:12 AM, Jayaram Ponnusamy > wrote: > > Hi All, > > Curr

Re: [users@httpd] [mod_proxy] status=E has no affect.

What version of httpd? What does the balancer-manager indicate? > On Aug 6, 2016, at 6:42 AM, dE wrote: > > Hi. > > I'm using the following config -- > > BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ http://[fc00::1:4]/ retry=600 > loadfactor=99 status=E > BalancerMember balancer://localbalance/ ht

Re: [users@httpd] Hcheck module can not get the parameter of hcuri

Let me take a look at this... > On Jul 29, 2016, at 7:26 PM, mb19890...@126.com wrote: > > Hi Lars, > > I am using the apache http server to proxy the request from brower and load > balancer, the version is 2.4.23, also I am working with module named > mod_proxy_hcheck to check the worker heal

Re: [users@httpd] rpmbuild for httpd-2.4.23 failed missing mod_proxy_fdpass.so

The only thing I can think of is that the whole configure dependency code for mod_proxy and its submodules was reworked due to a singular issue; this resulted in a lot of churn in that code and likely in order to fix one subset of people the "fix" affected a larger subset. Please forward your bug

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCE] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.23 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.23 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.23 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_wstunnel with Unix domain sockets

Thx for the report. Will investigate! > On Jun 4, 2016, at 2:39 AM, Michael Fladischer wrote: > > On 2016-05-22 20:51, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> What version of httpd are you using? > > Debian testing now updated to 2.4.20 but the problem still persists. No > connecti

Re: [users@httpd] Apache LoadBalancer goes into 302 infinite loop

2.4.2 is quite old, and there have been numerous fixes and improvements to the reverse proxy and load-balancer code since then... Is upgrading to 2.4.20 an option? > On Jun 13, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Baruch Volkov wrote: > > I do see thousandths posts on Apache LoadBancer and quite a few on infinite

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_wstunnel with Unix domain sockets

Hmmm... let me look. What version of httpd are you using? > On May 21, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Michael Fladischer wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have a Python ornado base websocket application that listens on a > Unix domain socket. It was initially written to work with nginx as its > frontend webserve

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy and DNS resolving

Since mod_proxy uses connection pooling, DNS is resolved when the socket is 1st created and then when it is then re-created as per the ttl of the connection pool itself. > On May 18, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Matthias Leopold > wrote: > > hi, > > in the comment section of http://httpd.apache.org/docs/

Re: [users@httpd] BalancerMember returns 500 internal server error before failover

Upgrading to 2.4.20 allow you to disable the one node dynamically on the httpd side and then bring down the node. > On Apr 20, 2016, at 8:10 AM, Wayne W wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm seeing that with Apache 2.4.12 on Solaris when setup with mod_proxy to 2 > tomcat instances when we bring down 1 node f

Re: [users@httpd] Apache ProxyPass locking all requests to balancer

No, that is not expected behavior... they are not dependent at all. > On Apr 20, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Wayne W wrote: > > Hi anyone got any ideas on this? > > thanks > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Wayne W wrote: > Hi, > > Perhaps this is default behaviour but its not what I was expecting.

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCE] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.20 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.20 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.20 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache

Re: [users@httpd] No Space Left on Device and Couldn't perform atomic initialization Errors

Many, many times this is when you fill up on IPCS (semaphores and/or shared memory). Use 'ipcs -a' to see what your current limits and usage is. > On Mar 11, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Mitchell Smith wrote: > > Hi > > I have a strange issue with Apache (2.2.23), fronting a svn repository > > Sometim

Re: [users@httpd] Howto accept only one connection

Yeah... No idea why anyone in the world would do this though... > On Feb 19, 2016, at 7:46 AM, Richard > wrote: > > > >> Date: Friday, February 19, 2016 13:32:02 +0100 >> From: Oliver Graute >> >> On 19/02/16, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>&

Re: [users@httpd] Howto accept only one connection

Just one connection? By that do you mean one concurrent user or actually one request or actually one connection? A connection is a socket opened between the client and the server. A request is a HTTP request on that connection. tia. > On Feb 19, 2016, at 2:50 AM, Oliver Graute wrote: > > On 18/

Re: [users@httpd] Apache logging format

The standard format strings for data to log can be found at: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_log_config.html#formats Is a 403 status code good enough for what you want regarding failure? > On Jan 28, 2016, at 12:38 PM, K R wrote: > > Is there a way to capture user login use

Re: [users@httpd] Apache support for Brotli?

It is on my TODO list... once I put the finishing touches on the reverse proxy health-check module, that's the next one I plan to attacking. > On Jan 27, 2016, at 4:32 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > > > > This is supp

Re: [users@httpd] Balancer Manager Documentation

The table data is basically a reflection of the current run-time status of the balancer member and balancer config itself. I also have some preso's on slideshare[1] which describe it as well: 1. http://www.slideshare.net/jimjag > On Jan 7, 2016, at 1:16 PM, Mark Brewer (FIS-Lake Mary) > wrote: >

Re: [users@httpd] Problem with LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable in httpd CentOS 7.1

When *did* it work? With previous versions of Apache httpd 2.4.* on CentOS 7.1, or on previous versions of CentOS? Basically, I'm trying to track down whether the issue in in CentOS 7.1 or in the Apache httpd code or maybe even in your config itself. > On Dec 20, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Hilbert Set wr

Re: [users@httpd] Refiring requests to proxy backend

> clueless, is how to resend the request to backend for the 2nd script in a > "LuaOutputFilter". > > Thanks & regards, > Jose > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > In general, if you prepend the URL w/ 'proxy:' and then >

Re: [users@httpd] Refiring requests to proxy backend

In general, if you prepend the URL w/ 'proxy:' and then use it in a subrequest, it will be processed as a proxy request. > On Dec 17, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Jose Thomas wrote: > > All, > > I am using httpd 2.4 with mod_proxy (http) routing requests to multiple > backends. > > I have a strange requ

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.18 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.18 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.18 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache

[users@httpd] reverse proxy wishlist

I put out a call on Twitter regarding this, but wanted to close the loop here as well. What would *you* like to see as new features or enhancements w/ mod_proxy, esp reverse proxy. I was thinking about some sort of active backend monitoring, utilizing watchdog, which could also maybe, eventually,

Re: [users@httpd] prefork vs worker mpm in apache

> On Nov 3, 2015, at 2:53 PM, Rose, John B wrote: > > On 11/3/15 2:21 PM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: > >> >>> On Nov 3, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> We had to recompile a

Re: [users@httpd] prefork vs worker mpm in apache

> On Nov 3, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > We had to recompile apache 2.4.12 because we needed to disable thread safety > in php (ZTS). Because for some reason when compiling php with the > --disable-maintainer-zts with the worker mpm model and checking the php inf

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.17 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache

[users@httpd] Festina Lente - Nóirín Plunkett / Shirley

If you have ever read the httpd doccos, there are many people who made them what they are, and are deserving of thanks. But today we have lost one of the main and core talents behind them. Nóirín was a bright light and a festive soul; they were talented and humble, with a passion tempered by joy a

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.16 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.16 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.16 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache H

Re: [users@httpd] mod_reqtimeout question:

By persistent, do you mean one that was held open via standard HTTP keepalive? Thx > On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Brian McBride wrote: > > Not having had a response to this question I'm left wondering whether I've > screwed up maybe by not asking a clear question or asking in the wrong place.

Re: [users@httpd] Apache is Slow

ror. Why Apache itself would "hang", I'm no so sure. If you can provide more info, I may be able to dig deeper. > On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:03 AM, Ethan Rosenberg > wrote: > > On 03/31/2015 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > I'm afraid that we have to

Re: [users@httpd] Apache is Slow

Are you sure that it's even listening on a network socket? Looks like it's actually using a unix domain socket. > On Mar 31, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ethan Rosenberg > wrote: > > On 03/31/2015 06:09 AM, Richard wrote: >> >> >> Original Message >>> Date: Tuesday, March 31,

Re: [users@httpd] Upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.4.12

A typical 'make install' will just over-write what needs to be updated, which will likely include all Apache provided modules. > On Feb 26, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Daryl Rose wrote: > > Just to preface this question, I am not very knowledgeable in Apache. I did > not setup this environment and have

Re: [users@httpd] Support for http/2 in Apache HTTPD?

> On Feb 23, 2015, at 7:14 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Chrome and IE are pushing for HTTP/2 sooner rather than later. Hopefully it >>> will be quick to come to apache because it certainly sounds like a major >>

Re: [users@httpd] Support for http/2 in Apache HTTPD?

trunk does. > On Feb 23, 2015, at 9:05 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2015, at 5:39 PM, curtis wrote: >> A little research found that apache supports http/2 via the mod_spdy module. > > No, that is not correct. SPDY is a precursor to HTTP/2 and is *not* HTTP/2. > Also, SPDY does not work i

Re: [users@httpd] Support for http/2 in Apache HTTPD?

> Chrome and IE are pushing for HTTP/2 sooner rather than later. Hopefully it > will be quick to come to apache because it certainly sounds like a major > improvement. "major" is a bit of an exaggeration :) - To unsubscribe,

Re: [users@httpd] HTTP/2?

Yeppers. The real issue is that HTTP/2 isn't even released yet, and those who hoped that by jumping on the SPDY bandwagon meant a jump-start on HTTP/2 now realize that a large chunk of the resources spent on SPDY capability is now pretty much wasted and would have been better spent on "green field"

Re: [users@httpd] Any Comparisons? -- mod_wl vs mod_proxy vs mod_jk

You could always try mod_proxy_ajp, which uses the mod_proxy framework, but communicates via AJP. It's better at detection of silently dropped AJP connections. > On Feb 9, 2015, at 3:18 AM, Dr James Smith wrote: > > > We used mod_jk for ages and have recently flipped back to mod_proxy for our

Re: [users@httpd] load balancer byrequest algorithm

I would not expect a specific pattern (or schedule), per se, but rather an overall trend or statistical average. > On Feb 2, 2015, at 7:38 AM, Chen, Yongcheng > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I’m testing now the apache load balancer. And I configured my apache server > for testing the example

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 create a huge amount of shared memory segments

If migrating to 2.4, I would suggest using the method Yann describes and have each balancer defined in its own vhost section. This is because it is most likely that inheriting balancers will be deprecated/removed in later versions of httpd, simply because (1) it doesn't make sense and (2) causes th

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 create a huge amount of shared memory segments

So is the main issue the amount of shm used, right? > On Dec 19, 2014, at 5:04 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: > > Hi Yann, > > Thank you for your feedback. > > My configuration is currently defining 338 virtual hosts and 169 proxy > balancers. > > The balancers are defined in the main section. Ea

Re: [users@httpd] Dynamic add proxy member using balancer-manager

because those elements are stored in shared memory, you can't simply just "add a new member" since it would involve allocating new shmem and copying stuff over, etc. So what we do is, during init, see how many members you have configed, and then allow you to add some "empty slots" for growth. That'

Re: [users@httpd] Load balancing with load detection on backend servers ?

The only real question is how the load value of the backend systems can be known and then "told" to Apache. I had proposed awhile ago using some sort of custom HTTP X-header to send that info. > On Nov 19, 2014, at 3:28 AM, ulrich.her...@t-systems.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > I know the load_bala

Re: [users@httpd] (36)File name too long

It's from ap_directory_walk() else if ((rv != APR_SUCCESS && rv != APR_INCOMPLETE) || !(thisinfo.valid & APR_FINFO_TYPE)) { /* If we hit ENOTDIR, we must have over-optimized, deny * rather than assume not found. */

Re: [users@httpd] Rewritemap External Rewriting Program

On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > Using prg on a high-volume site is discouraged, as all requests will be fed > through a single instance of the prg, creating a significant bottleneck. The > dash2under.pl example is just that - an example - and there are better ways > to accom

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.4.10 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.10 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.10 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

There was one for 2.0->2.2, so having one for 2.2->2.4 makes sense, and should be easy. On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > Should add that they even provided a script for renaming: > /usr/share/doc/apache2/migrate-sites.pl > > > > - Y > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:40 AM,

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass and HA Singleton Applications

What about using the 'lbset' parameter then? On Jul 3, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Federico Calì wrote: > Hi Eric, > > thanks for the hint but I think it's not what I need. > Defining the standby node(s) in the balancer definition I might loss > functionality for these reasons: > > - the JBoss cluster

Re: [users@httpd] Download

On Jul 2, 2014, at 4:49 AM, James Kerwin wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm incredibly new to Apache, apologies if this is stupid but if I didn't > need help I wouldn't ask. > > I'm using Apche2 on my laptop and on an actual server. The webpage I'm using > has a download button that points to a .zi

Re: [users@httpd] Preserve protocol in httpd proxy

I'm sure we can do w/ mod_rewrite... it's just that it's soo expensive :) On May 30, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Off the top of my head, I think we would need to >> add another proxypass option. > > Have you

Re: [users@httpd] Preserve protocol in httpd proxy

Off the top of my head, I think we would need to add another proxypass option. On May 30, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > I also would like to know :) > Is it also possible using Apache 2.4.7? > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > H

Re: [users@httpd] Preserve protocol in httpd proxy

Hmmm... let me mull this over. BTW: CCing on dev@ On May 29, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Juan Ignacio Barisich wrote: > I need to configure in Apache 2.4.9 (with mod_proxy and mod_proxy_wstunnel > activated) a proxy with this mapping: > > - http://my.proxy/* --> http://my.backend:8080/* > - ws://my.

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Proxy Module Help

Are you 100% sure that what is being returned by the backend is 'localhost' and not something else? I assume when you say it's not being "redirected" you mean that the 302s aren't being handled correctly... On May 11, 2014, at 1:22 AM, Buddhi Eashwarage wrote: > I want to redirect a url to an ap

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPassMatch with Unix sockets

Since this is a new feature, we are consistently adding enhancements and new methods for it... Thx for the feedback; let me take a look. On Apr 18, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Marc Aymerich wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote: >> >> On 18/04/2014 10:43 AM, "Igor Cicimov" wrote

Re: [users@httpd] error in apache installation. "checking whether the C compiler works... no" "configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables"

On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:14 AM, ayaskanta.praha...@wipro.com wrote: > ... > checking whether the C compiler works... no > configure: error: in `/u03/backup/Apps_stage/apache/httpd-2.4.9/srclib/apr': > configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details Have y

[users@httpd] ANNOUNCE: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.9 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.4.9 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.9 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache HT

Re: [users@httpd] Issues with UDS support for mod_proxy in trunk

Try this patch: find-worker.patch Description: Binary data On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:02 PM, ryo takatsuki wrote: > Hi, > > A month ago I checked the new UDS (Unix Domain Sockets) support and it worked > properly (I need to tweak it a little bit for my needs). The syntax at that > point was: >

Re: [users@httpd] Issues with UDS support for mod_proxy in trunk

Can you email the full logging? It looks like the ProxyPass isn't creating the worker correctly. You can email direct to me if you like (and if it is sizable). On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:02 PM, ryo takatsuki wrote: > Hi, > > A month ago I checked the new UDS (Unix Domain Sockets) support and it work

Re: [users@httpd] Issues with UDS support for mod_proxy in trunk

It looks like its using the generic reverse proxy worker... I'll take a look. On Nov 5, 2013, at 2:02 PM, ryo takatsuki wrote: > Hi, > > A month ago I checked the new UDS (Unix Domain Sockets) support and it worked > properly (I need to tweak it a little bit for my needs). The syntax at that >

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass without slash not working

iirc, this is fixed/addressed in later versions... On Oct 9, 2013, at 8:28 AM, Tiago Braga wrote: > Hello! > > I'm using the httpd Apache/2.2.15 in Linux RedHat with mod_proxy. > > I have the below configuration: > > > ServerName www.host.com.br > ProxyPass / http://static.host.com.

Re: [users@httpd] Timeouts after upgrading from 2.2.23 to 2.4.6

On Aug 27, 2013, at 11:25 AM, "Spangler, Tim" wrote: > 1) This Apache vhost is proxying traffic with mod_proxy (simply ProxyPass > rule) to an oc4j application server where the flash is hosted. The other > vhosts serve a variety of static content, run multiple rewrite rules, etc - > this is

Re: [users@httpd] Timeouts after upgrading from 2.2.23 to 2.4.6

1) Is the Flash content hosted on the server running Apache or is Apache the front-end of the Flash content provider? 2) Are all vhosts also proving Flash content? 3) Is there anything "special" about the vhost? 4) What are the typical server settings for the Worker MPM? 200 concurrent users

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Forward Proxy with App Server Integration.

There are a number of webinars and preso's on the reverse proxy capability of Apache... I would suggest you review those to get a basic understanding, at which point we'd be better able to answer your questions. On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:16 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Forward Proxy with App Server Integration.

> Hello Nick, > > Thanks for your reply. I am trying to understand what could be the interface > between Proxy Server (PS) and App Server (AS) given that App Server is a > Tomcat based HTTP Servlet. Proxy Server is going to be a mod_xxx written in > C. > > So my question is, what interface wi

Re: [users@httpd] LoadBalancingIssue - Users are not distributed equally among users

If you want a balance of hits, then byrequests would be a better LB method. On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:32 PM, aparna Puram wrote: > Hi Jim, > > We have access logs enabled for the tomcat servers and I used awstats to > measure the no of hits. > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:41

Re: [users@httpd] LoadBalancingIssue - Users are not distributed equally among users

How are you measuring the load on the backend Tomcats? On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:57 AM, aparna Puram wrote: > > Hello All, > > We have a apache server that acts as a load balancer for 6 backend tomcat > servers. > > However, If I compare the load on all the servers, there is a drastic > differen

Re: [users@httpd] Httpd vhosts and ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse and AJP - am I on crack?

Your use of ProxyPassReverse is wrong... http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypassreverse On Nov 26, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Dave Shevett wrote: > On 11/26/12 3:12 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: ># Working, live production host: >ProxyPass >

Re: [users@httpd] Httpd vhosts and ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse and AJP - am I on crack?

On Nov 26, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Dave Shevett wrote: > > Here's what I have now, and it's not working correctly. > > >ServerName www.FOO.com >ServerAlias FOO.com > >ProxyRequests Off > ># Working, live production host: >ProxyPass /a/ ajp://10.211.42.48:800

Re: [users@httpd] mod_proxy_balancer, balancer_manager questions

On Sep 13, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Colin Murtaugh wrote: > Hi -- > > I'm trying to set up a pair of tomcat servers behind apache using > mod_proxy_balancer. I'm using Apache 2.4.3 that I built a couple of days ago > on Solaris. > > I see in the 2.4 docs that balancer settings can now be persiste

[users@httpd] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.23 Released

Apache HTTP Server 2.2.23 Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.23 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is principally a security and bug fix maintenance release, inc

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 3.4.3 or 3.3.1 Pre-Compiled Versions

In general, the ASF doesn't provide pre-built binaries. However, if you can attach a copy of your config.log, people would be able to take a look at where it's failing. On Sep 12, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Frank Mancini wrote: > Sorry. mistype. I meant 2.4.3 > > I guess I kept getting a bunch of erro

  1   2   >