So, I should be more specific with my question: to the end of
determining strictly which webserver is more efficient do you see
any problems with this type of setup?
More 'efficient' I think you mean.
Is that not exactly what I said?
And another question: how would you do it differen
On Jan 15, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jarrod Slick > wrote:
What about having a private VLAN between a testing machine and the
apache
machine. I suppose that would solve the resource separation
problem between
the benchmarking tool and
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:44 AM, LuKreme wrote:
Run thousands of test across multiple connections from multiple
sources for each server if you want to see what the performance is
ACTUALLY like.
Unfortunately multiple sources is impractical for me unless you want
to donate some hardware. Tha
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jarrod Slick > wrote:
I'm curious -- why do you think that the results will be
inconsistent? If
anything I would be inclined to think that using localhost would
improve
consistency as extraneous variab
On Jan 15, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Tommy M. McGuire wrote:
Jarrod Slick wrote:
All tests will be performed on localhost.
I did not want to comment since I am not an Apache nor LiteSpeed
performance expert,
but I rather suspect that will invalidate any results you get. At
least it will make
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Scott Gifford > wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Jarrod Slick > wrote:
On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:47 AM, Scott Gifford wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Jarrod Slick > wrote:
Apache Users,
As some of you may or may not know a fairly
On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:47 AM, Scott Gifford wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Jarrod Slick > wrote:
Apache Users,
As some of you may or may not know a fairly prominent commercial
webserver, LiteSpeed, claims to outperform even a well configured
Apache 2.2.x installation by orders
Apache Users,
As some of you may or may not know a fairly prominent commercial
webserver, LiteSpeed, claims to outperform even a well configured
Apache 2.2.x installation by orders of magnitude. They have some
internal benchmarks that appear to back this up, but, being a natural
skeptic,
