RE: [us...@httpd] Encryption key size

2010-03-17 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: March 17, 2010 14:18 > From: Jeff Trawick Sent: March 17, 2010 13:50 > > > > Either this ("/etc/httpd/cgi-bin") is the wrong directory, or you > > need > > to also enable SSL envvars for /var/www/cgi-bin. From your envvars >

RE: [us...@httpd] Encryption key size

2010-03-17 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
ectory. I have made the suggested correction but I will be unable to test it until this evening when I can restart the httpd service otherwise I will have a bunch of upset users. I will post my results. Thanks very much for all your assistance. It is greatly appreciated. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh

RE: [us...@httpd] Encryption key size

2010-03-17 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
ile but both are virtually identical except for the ServerName, ServerAlias and DocumentRoot values. TIA Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com - The official User-To-User suppor

RE: [us...@httpd] Encryption key size

2010-03-17 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
dlc91e/bin/cgiip I hope that clarifies things a bit. TIA Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project

RE: [us...@httpd] Encryption key size

2010-03-17 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: March 17, 2010 11:00 > From: Jeff Trawick Sent: March 17, 2010 04:10 > > > > See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_ssl.html#ssloptions > > (StdEnvVars). SSL_CIPHER_USEKEYSIZE should be set. > > That looks perfect. Thank you much

RE: [us...@httpd] Encryption key size

2010-03-17 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Jeff Trawick Sent: March 17, 2010 04:10 > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank > > > > I am attempting to find a way of determining the encryption key size. > > Apparently the old environment variable was HTTPS_KEYSIZE which was > > renamed SSL_CIPH

[us...@httpd] Encryption key size

2010-03-16 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
rching but can find nothing further on this subject. So... Is there any way of determining the encryption key size on Apache 2.2.3? TIA Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com - The off

RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 certificate directory

2009-04-07 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
any localsystem location should be fine. For finer > understanding/convenience u can put it under conf folder like > conf/certs/ That was my impression but I wanted to make sure before I proceeded too far. Thanks for you response. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Sof

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 certificate directory

2009-04-06 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
. From all the research I have done the docs now use /path/to/this/server.crt and /path/to/this/server.key as the example locations. My question is: With Apache 2.2 is the a "standard" or "commonly accepted" directory that I should be using for storing our certs? TIA Regar

[us...@httpd] SSL_CIPHER_ALGKEYSIZE

2009-02-25 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
ssl.conf file but this does not seem to have had any effect. Am I missing something? Any suggestions and/or comments will be greatly appreciated. TIA Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory hiding

2008-09-16 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 16, 2008 15:32 > From: Sean Conner Sent: September 15, 2008 23:36 > > It was thus said that the Great Hugh E Cruickshank once stated: > > > > > > That may be the case but their recommendation is still: Issue a > > > &q

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory hiding

2008-09-16 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: André Warnier Sent: September 16, 2008 15:44 > Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > [...] > > I hear you but the client's security consultant (or whatever) is > > making the recommendation based on the software's report and the > > client is exercising due diligence

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory hiding

2008-09-16 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Sean Conner Sent: September 15, 2008 23:36 > It was thus said that the Great Hugh E Cruickshank once stated: > > > > That may be the case but their recommendation is still: Issue a > > "404 - Not Found" response status code for a forbidden resource, > >

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory hiding

2008-09-15 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Nick Kew Sent: September 15, 2008 19:43 > > On 16 Sep 2008, at 02:44, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > > > Right now if someone were to attempt to access these subdirectories > > (i.e. http://www.example.com/cgi-bin) they would receive a 403 > > Forbidden error mes

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Directory hiding

2008-09-15 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
ied adding: order allow,deny deny from all but this did not work and it would not allow our application to run either. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. TIA Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-so

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Upgrade Apache 2.0.46 to 2.0.59 (on RHEL3.9 )

2008-09-15 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
> [big snip] Hi Gene: Thanks for the info. I will definitely give that a try before doing the "non-standard" upgrade. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com - The official User