Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VirtualHost and default domain

2008-01-10 Thread Gregor Schneider
If I'm not mistaken, you should use only ONE overall ServerName-directive in your configs, the rest should be handled with ServerAlias (even having multiple VHosts) Meaning, if you change ServerName xyz.domain.com to ServerAlias xyz.domain.com it should work. Cheers Gregor -- what's puzzlin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2, Vhosts and SSL

2007-12-30 Thread Gregor Schneider
Pavel, On Dec 30, 2007 4:36 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not exactly true, you may try to use the SNI patch that allows several > certs on a single ip. > it's still true, however, maybe the statement is not complete. TLS is pretty new, and i.e. my firefox-browser does not accept such a cert

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2, Vhosts and SSL

2007-12-29 Thread Gregor Schneider
you will need either different ip/port-combinations for each ssl-site or you can try with the so-called wildcard-certs (example. https://www.thawte.com/ssl-digital-certificates/wildcardssl/index.html). most recent browsers will support them. cheers gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost

2007-11-21 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Owen! On Nov 21, 2007 4:59 PM, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's about right... You didn't (mercifully :-) show us your complete config, > well, if u need some reading-stuff. I'll send them to ypu right away or, if you prefer, post 'em here on the list ;) > but I'm guessing you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost

2007-11-21 Thread Gregor Schneider
hi krist, > > Are you sure? This looks like Apache behaving against its > specification in a big way. > I am sure since it's working as expected. Afaik this issue has been discussed before, I just couldn't find it. Against what specs should Apache behave? Any URL quoting those specs? As I'm un

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost

2007-11-20 Thread Gregor Schneider
Guys, I've just solved the problem. As I said b4, I don't care about a message stating "SSL-cert is not valid" since it's just a test-server. The problem was the ServerName-directive: Now I've changed my vhost-definition to ServerAlias test-clue ServerAlias test-clue .

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with NameVirtualHost and VirtualHost

2007-11-20 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Guys, I always keep being puzzled about those options, and I also don't get enlighted by the doc. this is what I have: System: Debian Etch /etc/apache2/apaxhe2.conf: ... NameVirtualHost *:80 NameVirtualHost *:443 ... in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled I have file clue: ServerName test-cl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Center for Internet Security's Apache Benchmark Project Update

2007-11-06 Thread Gregor Schneider
On 11/6/07, Ryan Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why not a URL where we can view it? > [Ryan Barnett] Here you go - > http://apachebenchmark.sourceforge.net/CIS_Apache_Benchmark_v2.1.doc > ehem - great, however, there's no such thing like ms word on my machine - hope it's not too much ask

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nessus hole report: MS/DOS device names

2007-09-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
the only nonsense is to run dos / win-modules on a *nix-box & then worry about the messages... cheers gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nessus hole report: MS/DOS device names

2007-09-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Within Nessus, you have the options to choose the tests you want to run. It's a bit of work, however, configuring (choosing those tests dealing with *your* os / webserver / database etc.) and then saving them for future usage is worth while and avoids such garbage-messages. Coming to your specific

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ServletFilter and Apache HTTP Server

2007-08-31 Thread Gregor Schneider
if (knowledge == 0) { read (FAQ); use (SEARCH_DOCS); use (GOOGLE); } else { use (BRAIN); make (POST); } Gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OS recommendation

2007-07-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
www.debian.org man aptitude gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 - The official User-To-User support forum

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using mod_headers to modify an existing header

2007-07-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
Sorry, Kevin, thought the only difference between the Request and the 302-Response was http/https (meaning redirecting to HTTPS). I simply got you wrong. Cheers Gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using mod_headers to modify an existing header

2007-07-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
how about mod_rewrite? RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: https redirection

2007-05-18 Thread Gregor Schneider
ServerName www.foo.com [ ... ] RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://www1.foo.com/$1 [ ...] :443> ServerAlias www1.foo.com [ ... ] HTH Gregor -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] server port problem

2007-02-14 Thread Gregor Schneider
Well, it's raining here in Cologne although I bought tanner yesterday, anybody can help? Have a look here http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html, re-think and then come back. And, btw., reading the manual usually is a good start... Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my ga

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cache Control

2007-01-31 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Ian, great your problem is solved now, however, could you pls. describe what didn't work with the other solution (SetEnvIf & Mod_headers)? I'm just curious since this is working for us. What headers are you getting xactly now? Just "Expires", I assume, and no "Cache-Control:" - right? Cheer

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cache Control

2007-01-30 Thread Gregor Schneider
Rather than looking at Ethereal, get yourself a copy of Firefox and install the plugin "LiveHttpHeaders" (https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3829/) - saved us a lot of time here and made life *much* easier. good luck! Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA52680702

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cache Control

2007-01-30 Thread Gregor Schneider
Just a shot from the hip: # load modules sentenvif and headers - adapt the path!!! # LoadModule setenvif_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_setenvif.so LoadModule headers_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_headers.so # # define grafix depending on the extension: SetEnvIf Request_URI "\.(gif)|(j

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] error with Find comand

2007-01-21 Thread Gregor Schneider
Anil, sorry, don't know about your config and I'm running Debian here, besides we're offtopic. Maybe you want to report your problem to the Suse mailinglist. Just send a blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the topic "subscribe", I'm sure you'll find some competent help there. Cheers Greg --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] error with Find comand

2007-01-21 Thread Gregor Schneider
although offtopic: how about find / -type f -name "test\.sh" -print I assume you try this as root? Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 -

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Question regarding Squid / Apache

2007-01-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi guys, I'm wondering if setting up Squid as a reverse proxy in front of our hardware-load-balanced Apache/Tomcat-installations could boost up performance. After I did some reading about Squid, I understood: - Squid is caching requests - I can prevent Squid from caching dynamic content - Squid

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to manage single sign on with apache

2006-12-25 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Meir, we are not using LDAP. The principle of our solution is as follows: We have written a simple Servlet, that gets authenticated by Tomcat via FormLogin. The Servlet will then read the Cookie JSSOSessionID and will write the contents of this Cookie into the MySQL-DB specified by mod_auth_

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to manage single sign on with apache

2006-12-24 Thread Gregor Schneider
nope, it's one module, and it doesn't break modularity. please refer to the docs which have been posted above to understand how it's working. maybe you can do the same by combining the named modules, however, it's way more work, more complex and it's really the question if you get it working anyw

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to manage single sign on with apache

2006-12-24 Thread Gregor Schneider
nope. you could create a memory-realm for tomcat, however, you'll need a mysql-db for apache (mod_auth_cookie_mysql). cheers greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to manage single sign on with apache

2006-12-22 Thread Gregor Schneider
forgot to mention: the above solution works the other way round: authentication is done by tomcat, which then passes a cookie. the cookie is stored in a mysql-db which is read by mod_auth_cookie_mysql. if there's a valid entry, authorization for apache is granted by mod_auth_cookie_mysql. cheers

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to manage single sign on with apache

2006-12-22 Thread Gregor Schneider
take a look at mod_auth_cookie_mysql2 (assuming you're using apache2): http://home.digithi.de/digithi/dev/mod_auth_cookie_mysql/ cheers Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3FE028B3170B2 gpgp-key available @ http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371 -

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 doesn't load my Vhosts

2006-12-18 Thread Gregor Schneider
Dear list, I've just migrated an I386-Linux-Debian Sarge to Edge. Since Edge includes Apache 2.2, this means I also had to move from Apache 2.0.x to Apache 2.2 Although I know that Joshua is going to scold me ;), I've set up 3 SSL-VHosts on one Debian-Server, all having the same IP. This is a de

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ssl - force ssl per directory

2006-12-13 Thread Gregor Schneider
My suggestion: ServerName your_server ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] # don't loose time with IP address lookups HostnameLookups Off # needed for named virtual hosts UseCanonicalName Off # RewriteEngine On RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 RewriteLog /var/lo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Selectively forward trafic from Apache to Tomcat

2006-11-29 Thread Gregor Schneider
Forgive me, I was mixing up 2 threads, sorry 4 that. Maybe it's time to call it a day. Sorry again Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Proje

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Selectively forward trafic from Apache to Tomcat

2006-11-29 Thread Gregor Schneider
Forgot to mention that Ian asked in the Tomcat-userlist if he could run both on the same port (check for the post "Can Apache and Tomcat both be configured in port 80?") Sorry, forgot to mention that Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Selectively forward trafic from Apache to Tomcat

2006-11-29 Thread Gregor Schneider
This wont work. Ian asked if both (Apache & Tomcat) could be configured to listen on the same port, and the anser here is definately a NO. What you can do is use the connector JK 1.2, run Apache in front, Tomcat on port i.e. 8009. JK then will forward the specified requests to Tomcat, similar to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Selectively forward trafic from Apache to Tomcat

2006-11-29 Thread Gregor Schneider
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ cheers Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-20 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi folks, at last everything is working as expected. I can specify as many NAME BASED SSL-Virtual Hosts for the same IP-adress. PLEASE DO NOTE THAT THIS IS JUST A TEST / DEVELOPMENT-SETUP AND THAT THE SSL-CONNECTION IS NOT SECURE (please refer to the previous explanations in this thread). Howev

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
OK, I will try this tomorrow (been a long day here in Europe) and if I hopefully succeed, I'll post the working configs so that other can participate. Thanks again & good night! Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can I force mod-cache to cache tomcat-generated pages with Pragma:no-cache?

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Vitaly, I don't know about mod_cache, but we're having a similar configuration here (Apache in front, Tomcat serving behind). We experienced that Apache doesn't "touch" any headers when they are served from Tomcat. Unfortunately. there is no option within Tomcat to declare http-headers in the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Joshua, I really have to thank you for this, somehow I really must have misunderstood the doc completely. If I read all the posts regarding SSL in this (and the other post): Do I assume correctly that - I can set up test-clue:443 and test-ltc:443 in the same way, provided - they are using the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Great, that made it, but I'd also like to understand what happend. The docs say: ServerName Directive Description:Hostname and port that the server uses to identify itself Syntax:ServerName [scheme://]fully-qualified-domain-name[:port] Context:server config, virtual host Status:Core Module:core

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Sorry, had a typo:In my apache2.config, I changed it toNameVirtualHost *:80NameVirtualHost *:443Still the error occursGreg-- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Ok, maybe now I'm getting what you mean:I kept the configs as they are, but changed my apache2.conf toNameVirtualHost test-dom:80NameVirtualHost test-dom:443and I've changed my VHosts all the (abbreviated)     ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]    ServerName test-dom    ServerAdmin [EMAI

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Joshua.On 10/19/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's fine.  But then you should post your best attempt at the properconfig.  Not some garbage you are guessing at that has no resemblanceat all to the docs that you say you read.  (I can't imagine how youcould have read those docs and co

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Joshua,I really do appreciate your effort in this list and your support, however:I've tried that, I read the docs you mentioned, I tried it also with NameVirtualHost*:80 and NameVirtualHost *:443, all to no avail. See, in the end I'm developing J2EE-wepapps, that's my job, but I'm far from being a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] multiple vhosts on port 80 and port 443

2006-10-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi owen,On 10/19/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The question is usually asked by people who haven't thought long enoughabout why they want to use SSL. They think because it's encrypted on thewire, that's already pretty good and having a valid cert is just a bureaucratic bonus.nope, that

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namebased Virtual Hosts

2006-10-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Hoshua,first, thanks for your explanations, however, I'm havin 2 questions:On 10/17/06, Joshua Slive < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:You need only one NameVirtualHost directive for each IP-address/port combination.  And you should not use hostnames in NameVirtualHost or.  In a simple case like yours,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namebased Virtual Hosts

2006-10-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi guys,I'm having the honor to set up an environment where 3 different virtual hosts should be running on Apache 2.0.x, each listening on :80 and :443.Operating system is Debian Sarge.The problem: I'm just having ONE IP-adress. Since this is only a test- and development-server, I thought I'd  try

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OT - Thanks to all...

2006-09-17 Thread Gregor Schneider
[x] my signature heregregor-- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite-question

2006-09-16 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Pane,thanks a lot, I guess the (.*) was the _expression_ I was looking for.Great!Gregor-- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite-question

2006-09-15 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi guys,I've just walked through the docs of mod_rewrite and I got overwhelmed by the complexity of it :(Actually I just want to do quite a simple thing:If my URI contains/SingleSignOn/SingleSignOn?r=/dom[plus_some_other_stuff_here] change it to/SingleSignOn/SingleSignOn?r=/domIf I got the docs cor

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stupid question regarding session

2006-09-14 Thread Gregor Schneider
Dear all, just a stupid question regarding Apache and sessions: We are running Apache 2.0.5x together with Tomcat 5.15.x and are using mod_auth_cookie_mysql. Authorization is handeld via Tomcat. Now mod_auth_cookie_mysql sets an expiration-time into the MySQL-database, after which the cookie is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 showing jsp source codes

2006-09-07 Thread Gregor Schneider
Jack, you're better of with a 404 rather than the source, hm? Take a look at the apache access-logs: What's the url causing a 404? What's the url when getting a 200? Is there a difference? Cheers Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game ---

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 showing jsp source codes

2006-09-07 Thread Gregor Schneider
Ooops, should have waited 5 minutes, anyways... Jacky, that means you have a complete copy of your JSP-files on your Apache-machine? If so, have you taken a look into your Apache-logs? Is there an option that you configure mod_caucho so that it logs in debug-mode? Greg -- what's puzzlin' you, i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 showing jsp source codes

2006-09-07 Thread Gregor Schneider
Jacky, just try to call your Resin-app directly (i.e. http://your_host/your_app:8009 where 8009 is the port where Resin is listening to) and try to reproduce the behaviour. As Nick wrote, it's most likely that it's a "Resin"-thing *unless* your jsp-directories are available to Apache (that could

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 showing jsp source codes

2006-09-07 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Jacky, I'm too sorry, but here I'm really running out of any ideas - most of all, since I'm not a Resin-expert but am more into Tomcat as a servlet-container. Hopefully somebody from this list or from the Resin-Group is able to help you out. Sorry that I don't have any better suggestion for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 showing jsp source codes

2006-09-07 Thread Gregor Schneider
hi jacky, you also wrote "we discover that sometimes apache will display" - are you able to specify this "sometimes"? can you spot any rules when this happens? is it for a certain wep-app only? only a certain url? if so, what's the difference between the working wep-apps and the wep-apps not work

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 showing jsp source codes

2006-09-07 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Jacky, without knowing too much about mod_caucho, to me it sounds as if there is a misconfiguration in mod_caucho since the documents seem not to be forwarded to your Resin container. Can you determine wether your pages (when the source-code is displayed) are served by Apache or Resin? I sugg

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Next part of my HTPD.conf file.

2006-09-07 Thread Gregor Schneider
and maybe another free-of-charge-tip for the future: never ever post the name of your website AND your configs AND demonstrate to the whole list that you got no idea of how to setup a web-server: the result is most likely that your webserver won't be running for too long since this is an invitati

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A NetHack-esque Journey of the dark arts for DBD(mysql) under httpd-2.2.3

2006-08-30 Thread Gregor Schneider
ok - i just got my popcorn & beer ;) cheers! greg ps: thank god there are some volunteers like you who test the new stuff so we don't have to ;) -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game - The official User-To-User supp

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_expires not working

2006-08-03 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Joshua,On 8/3/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The point is, if you know you need those modules, those lines do> absolutely nothing positive and may deceive you into thinking nothing> is wrong if the modules are ever removed.ok, got that  > That's all a tomcat issue that would be b

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_expires not working

2006-08-03 Thread Gregor Schneider
Hi Joshua,first, thanks for the info.Anyhow, a few questions:On 8/3/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Apache HTTPD 2.0.48, Suse 9 something, Tomcat 5.0.28 working together with> > Apache HTTPD via mod_jk.> Rather old version of apache.actually it's 2.0.49 - however, we do prefer some

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_expires not working

2006-08-02 Thread Gregor Schneider
hi guys,I'm getting nuts here. This is what i have:Apache HTTPD 2.0.48, Suse 9 something, Tomcat 5.0.28 working together with Apache HTTPD via mod_jk.I have loaded and included both mod_headers and mod_expires (verified via https:/.../server-info), however, something puzzels me here: First, I'm att