Fabio Corazza wrote:
[snip]
> Everything is fine except the verbosity of the suEXEC mechanism, which
> writes a notice for every request that is passed to the CGI:
[snip]
With the help of a colleague we wrote a patch to get rid of excessive
verbosity of suEXEC, for whom they intend to run
Joshua Slive wrote:
> On 10/3/06, Fabio Corazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What it concerns me is: if I delete the logging of the transactions,
>> will suEXEC be able to open the log file if any other error happens?
>
> Sorry, but I'm not going to give
gging of the transactions,
will suEXEC be able to open the log file if any other error happens?
Regards,
--
Fabio Corazza - Engineering
NewBay Software, Ltd.
Wilson House, Fenian Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Phone: +353 1 634 5490 - e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
ld greatly appreciate your help.
Regards,
--
Fabio Corazza - Engineering
NewBay Software, Ltd.
Wilson House, Fenian Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Phone: +353 1 634 5490 - e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
The official User-To-User support fo
