RE: [users@httpd] protecting a list of specific urls

2013-10-25 Thread Edward Quick
Require valid-user See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#location Cheers, Colin On 25 October 2013 12:37, Edward Quick wrote: Hi group, I have a list of specific urls I want to protect, for example: /site1/abc /site2/tux /site3/zzz which I can configure in separat

[users@httpd] protecting a list of specific urls

2013-10-25 Thread Edward Quick
Hi group, I have a list of specific urls I want to protect, for example: /site1/abc /site2/tux /site3/zzz which I can configure in separate location blocks like below and that works fine. However I was wondering if there is a simpler way I can do this like a url whitelist file instead? Thanks

RE: [users@httpd] Certificate mismatch error

2013-02-26 Thread Edward Quick
Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Edward Quick wrote: Is your certificate issued by an internal CA or someone like Verisign/Komodo etc?I wonder if the Oracle DB connecting has the CA root certificate installed in their truststore. If they do, check the certificate chain for your site to m

RE: [users@httpd] Certificate mismatch error

2013-02-26 Thread Edward Quick
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Edward Quick wrote: Could you clarify, when you say : The Certificate was installed into a Wallet-Manager of the ORACLE-DB. I need this Certificate for a communication between ORACLE-DB to the Webserver. Does that mean you are doing client certificate

RE: [users@httpd] Certificate mismatch error

2013-02-25 Thread Edward Quick
from client to pin point their/DB problem? Thanks & Regards,Bijayant Kumar On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Edward Quick wrote: Hi Bijayant, You don't need another certificate if xyz.com is a subject alternate name of the primary certificate abc.com, so your understanding there i

RE: [users@httpd] Certificate mismatch error

2013-02-24 Thread Edward Quick
Hi Bijayant, You don't need another certificate if xyz.com is a subject alternate name of the primary certificate abc.com, so your understanding there is correct.Is the intermediate certificate set up? Regards,Edward. Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:49:45 +0530 From: bijayant@gmail.com To: users@

RE: [users@httpd] Very confused about Re-negotiation request failed (and SSLInsecureRenegotiation)

2013-02-12 Thread Edward Quick
ing me is that I got more than 10% of users complaining they can't access our webserver. Are so many people equipped with outdated browsers ? Denis Le 11.02.2013 09:33, Edward Quick a écrit : Hi Denis, I've been throug

RE: [users@httpd] Very confused about Re-negotiation request failed (and SSLInsecureRenegotiation)

2013-02-11 Thread Edward Quick
Hi Denis,I've been through exactly the same situation. There isn't anything you can do from the apache side to fix this apart from enabling insecure renegotiation, but you shouldn't. The customers have to fix their end by possibly upgrading to a later browser in the case of FF/Chrome. Assuming

[users@httpd] httpd already running

2013-01-31 Thread Edward Quick
Hi, I'm wondering if the following scenario is a bug or designed, because if httpd dies and leaves behind a pidfile containing a pid which later gets reused, the httpd refuses to come back up. I've already seen this in production, where a host has crashed and on coming back up the web server fa

RE: [users@httpd] using a vendor's apache

2012-02-25 Thread Edward Quick
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:45:09 -0600 > From: bmill...@gmail.com > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] using a vendor's apache > > On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:06:45 + > Edward Quick wrote: > > > > > Hi Apache Users, > > T

[users@httpd] using a vendor's apache

2012-02-25 Thread Edward Quick
Hi Apache Users, The place where I work is embarking on a project to migrate custom apache builds to the RHEL6 build. Obviously that brings certain limitations (not being able to use the snazzy new Apache 2.4 version for example!!) I was curious whether anyone else had gone down this route, and

RE: [us...@httpd] RE: mod_proxy_balancer back end status check

2010-03-10 Thread Edward Quick
t: Re: [us...@httpd] RE: mod_proxy_balancer back end status check On 9 March 2010 23:01, Edward Quick wrote: > Further testing showed this succeeded when the server was busy. The balancer > marked the member's status as Err. > However later after firing continuous requests, the

RE: [us...@httpd] RE: mod_proxy_balancer back end status check

2010-03-09 Thread Edward Quick
writing a script to check the backend and disable the members via a curl call to the balancer-manager page, but that seems a bit crude. Is there anything else I can add to the configuration below which might handle a code 500? -Original Message----- From: Edward Quick [mailto

RE: [us...@httpd] RE: mod_proxy_balancer back end status check

2010-03-09 Thread Edward Quick
2010 19:57 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] RE: mod_proxy_balancer back end status check On 9 March 2010 17:47, Edward Quick wrote: > Here's my configuration. After the 15 seconds timeout, the back end > server (listening on port 8080 here) returns a 502 page. I

[us...@httpd] RE: mod_proxy_balancer back end status check

2010-03-09 Thread Edward Quick
ut 15 ProxyPass /HelloWorld/ balancer://tomcat/HelloWorld/ ProxyPassReverse /HelloWorld/ balancer://tomcat/HelloWorld/ BalancerMember http://localhost:8080 route=jvm001 redirect=jvm002 BalancerMember http://localhost:8082 route=jvm002 From: Edward Quick [mailto:edward.qu...@igindex.co.uk] Sent: 08

[us...@httpd] mod_proxy_balancer back end status check

2010-03-08 Thread Edward Quick
Hi, When using mod_proxy_balancer, is it possible to configure the way it checks the status of the member servers in its cluster? I have come across a scenario where the back end server is running, and accepts requests but doesn't send responses. This gives the impression it is up, but in actua