Re: [users@httpd] Forward Proxy on behalf of the client instead of as a tunnel

2017-02-28 Thread Daniel Frank
ith it, > but it might work. > -- > > With Best Regards, > Marat Khalili > > On February 28, 2017 6:39:38 PM GMT+03:00, Daniel Frank < > danthehit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I see how my original question made it sound like a single service. I >> was

Re: [users@httpd] Forward Proxy on behalf of the client instead of as a tunnel

2017-02-28 Thread Daniel Frank
, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Marat Khalili wrote: > Why are you calling it _forward_ proxy if it's only going to connect to > one service? Your problem can easily be solved with _reverse_ proxy. > > -- > > With Best Regards, > Marat Khalili > > On 28/02/17 02:16, Da

Re: [users@httpd] Forward Proxy on behalf of the client instead of as a tunnel

2017-02-28 Thread Daniel Frank
, Feb 28, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Daniel Frank wrote: > I see how my original question made it sound like a single service. I was > trying to keep the scenario as simple as possible and probably over > simplified it. The reality is that the endpoint we will be connecting to > will be many a

[users@httpd] Forward Proxy on behalf of the client instead of as a tunnel

2017-02-27 Thread Daniel Frank
All, I am trying to set Apache up as a forward proxy to help solve an issue that we have where an HTTP Client in our application does not support TLS 1.2 but an API that we need to consume only supports TLS 1.2. What I am attempting to do is use Apache to talk HTTPS/TLS 1.2 to the target API but