On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 at 21:40, Chase wrote:
> Is the GET request always rooted at "/" ?
Actually, I tell a lie. The format of a request COULD be
GET http://www.somedomainname.com/somefilename.htm HTTP/1.1
although this form of request is likely only when talking to a proxy
server. Have a read of
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 at 21:11, Chase wrote:
> Assuming someone types "www.somedomainname.com/somefilename.htm" into
> the location field in their favorite browser...
>
> A browser would never request like this would it:
>
> GET /somefilename.htm
>
> ??
>
>
> Since so many websites are using sh
se you need to use No-Case for)
HTH.
Regards,
Dan Goodes : Systems Programmer : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help support PlanetMirror - Australia's largest Internet archive
by signing up for PlanetMirror Premium : http://planetmirror.com
--
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 at 19:34, Matt England wrote:
> At 7/24/2005 07:29 PM, Dan Goodes wrote:
> >Unfortunately the only solution for your problem is to use an FTP server
> >for that file. Stable Apache releases simply won't serve it.
>
> Ok, this all makes sense, and it&
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 at 19:01, Matt England wrote:
> A file (named /x/y/tmp/bigfile for this example) of size 4219052708 bytes
> did not display in my browser for my Apache 2.0.52 server. Any ideas why not?
>
> All the other files had no problems with this display.
>
> I suspect it has to do with
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 at 16:06, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:10:42AM +1000, Dan Goodes wrote:
> > Hi Folks
> >
> > I remember reading somewhere that Apache 1.3.33 supposedly supports large
> > files >2G on 32-bit systems. However I'm not having mu
abnormally).
Any ideas? Is that the correct set of flags to enable large-file support
on 1.3.33 ? TIA.
Regards,
Dan Goodes : Systems Programmer : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help support PlanetMirror - Australia's largest Internet archiv
