Re: [users@httpd] Decades old minor bug...

2025-05-23 Thread Curry, Alan
On 5/22/2025 10:45 AM, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: > > logname? logINname? Remote user login name? > Anything but "LOGname"! It is about a user, a login, not a log(file). Whoever wrote the %l code and documentation for Apache didn't hallucinate the word "logname". It was at least marginally acceptabl

Re: [users@httpd] Script behaving differently when run by Apache and when run from a shell by user www-data?

2024-01-24 Thread Curry, Alan
On 1/23/2024 3:58 PM, EML wrote: > What's interesting here is that CGI appears to be doing something more > complex than simply forking a process. The script which is the problem > has an EUID of 0, so why can't it unmount a filesystem? Have I just > messed up (probably?) Or has Apache run me /wit

RE: [users@httpd] What replaces DefaultType in 2.4?

2015-01-21 Thread Curry, Alan
Eric Covener [cove...@gmail.com] wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Curry, Alan wrote: > > I'm slightly worried based on the bug report referenced above that 2.4 > > may not have a solution to this problem. But it really shouldn't be that > > way. Sending

[users@httpd] What replaces DefaultType in 2.4?

2015-01-20 Thread Curry, Alan
The 2.4 documentation says: |The DefaultType directive no longer has any effect, other than to emit a |warning if it's used with any value other than none. You need to use |other configuration settings to replace it in 2.4. I am unable to determine what those "other configuration settings" are. T