Re: [us...@httpd] Possible to use pseudo-name based SSL-connections with many SSL hosts in the background?

Hi Krist, Krist van Besien schrieb: > The problem is that you are trying to work around a problem in the > protocol. It is not a limitation of apache that you can't use > namebased virtualhosts with ssl, it's a limitation in the protocol, > and you will encounter this limitation regardless of what

[us...@httpd] Possible to use pseudo-name based SSL-connections with many SSL hosts in the background?

Hi all, Usually it's not possible to use name-based virtual hosts for SSL connections since the well known chicken-egg problem (at least if I understood the FAQ correctly). My question would be if there is some way of "emulating" this if one has a server which uses virtualization to run different

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kerberos issues

Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Carsten Aulbert > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> we experience something weird here. We are running Apache 2.2.3 with >> mod_auth kerb 5.3 on Debian Etch. Authentication against a remote >

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Kerberos issues

Hi all, we experience something weird here. We are running Apache 2.2.3 with mod_auth kerb 5.3 on Debian Etch. Authentication against a remote Kerberos server (V5) works but when I access web pages with a lot of (embedded) images, several pop-ups appear, asking me to identify myself again. Since

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Combining userdir and redirect

Hi all, I'm a bit stuck right now not knowing how to proceed. On Apache 2.2 (Debian Etch) I'm running to userdirs nested into each other. The first one enables user directories for the directory WWW and the second one enables this for SSL and Kerberos: UserDir WWW UserDir disabled