No matter which solution you choose, the real problem is to detect that the
server fails.
If the server stops responding to requests, that's easy enough. However if
there is not a clear-cut failure, e.g. one server gradually slows down, or
still responds to the polls from the load balancer but
ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain does not change the cookie name - only the domain
field of the cookie.
Use LiveHTTPHeaders on Mozilla or similar (like Ethereal, burpproxy...) to see
exactly what the browser receives (Set-Cookie header) and what it subsequently
sends to the server in terms of cook
I explicitly set it to 0 for all of my servers. Never had a problem.
In my mind setting it to anything different than zero would just be a temporary
hack to circumvent a bug in some module, particularly memory leaks.
Various load tests I have made on Apache clearly show that restarting processe
Somebody is probably reformatting your hard drive.
No, seriously you need to provide a LOT more information about your
configuration for anyone to get the foggiest idea about what causes this.
What HW/OS? Are these disk reads or writes? What kind of modules do you use?
PHP or no PHP? etc.
I on
If I may inject a related question here, I was recently surprised to discover
the order in which rewrite rules are evaluated when using "RewriteOptions
inherit" in a VH. It seems like the rewrite rules included in the VH are
evaluated before the ones that are inherited.
Is that correct?
Is ther
Whenever possible I try to avoid modifying the URL path when reverse proxying.
Then mod_proxy_html is not needed and you save some CPU cycles.
ProxyPass http://www.flickr.com/flickr
ProxyPassReverse http://www.flickr.com/flickr
-ascs
De : proteus guy
Lalit,
Your WebSphere plugin XML configuration file probably does not contain any
configuration for port 9191. You need to add *:9191 to the list of addresses on
which the plugin will intercept requests. You do that by adding a VirtualHost
to the appropriate VirtualHostGroup in the plugin con
Hi Michelle,
There are systems that allow you to authenticate a user, set a cryptographic
session cookie on the client browser and subsequently use that token to
authenticate the client sending the HTTP request. These systems also allow you
to define access control rules that depend on the user
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^mid=(\d+)$
RewriteRule ^/movie_play.php /movie%1.html? [R]
-Message d'origine-
De : tech user [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 25 septembre 2007 08:18
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] help about a rewrite rul
Is it possible that the directory is not writable to the Apache process owner??
If the server listens to ports below 1024 that's unlikely since it must start
as root and will have root privileges when creating the pid and log files, but
you never know...
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De :
HTTPS and NameVirtualHost do not go well together. NVH is based on the Host
header. However Apache cannot read the Host header before the SSL session has
been established. But in order to establish the SSL session, Apache needs to
know what virtual host it is for to determine what certificate to
If you know what you are doing, you can turn on or more of the following cache
settings:
- CacheIgnoreCacheControl
- CacheIgnoreNoLastMod
AND limit the time during which the response may be cached with
- CacheMaxExpire
You should also add
- CacheIgnoreHeaders: S
Hi
Those of you who use mod_rewrite in a reverse-proxy scenario (RewriteRule with
the [P] flag) might be interested in
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43308.
In such a scenario mod_proxy will not be able to use persistent connections
(KeepAlive) to the origin server. This is
Why don't you try
Header set Referer ""
or,
Header unset Referer
Looks like the mod_header filter is executed pretty late in the request
processing, so that might do the trick.
-ascs
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 6 septem
access_status = OK;
}
-ascs
-Message d'origine-
De : Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Envoyé : mercredi 29 août 2007 19:18
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.x mod_rewrite and mod_proxy and pooled
connections
Hello folks,
I have been doing some testing wi
Hello folks,
I have been doing some testing with Apache 2.2.4 recently, and one of the
things I am particularly interested in is the pooling of backend connections of
mod_proxy's as this makes it possible to maintain persistent connections to
backend systems across requests from different clien
You probably need to modify the access rights of the associated Directory
section accordingly.
I am not familiar with Apache on Win XP but I guess you need something like
Options MultiViews
AllowOverride None
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
-ascs
-Original Message-
F
Ooops. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ionescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:52 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: problem with mod_rewrite rewiterule with
[P](internal proxying)
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> What d
Very strange... Apparently the list software omitted to insert the Reply-To
header.
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 8:23 AM
To: 'Ravish Agarwal'
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: problem with mod_rewrite rewiterule with
[P](interna
with this new virtual host group, for example:
Should everything else fail, please contact your friendly IBM representative.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Ravish Agarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 11:20 AM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Cc: users@httpd.apach
apache 1.3
says but its not there at apache 2.0 manual page. I am using apache 2.0.55
Output of httpd -l shows the following
$ ./httpd -l
Compiled in modules:
core.c
worker.c
http_core.c
mod_so.c
I have the mod_proxy_http enabled too. So what could be the poblem?
On 7/7/06, Axel-Stéphane
What does that have to do with this particular problem
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ionescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:06 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: problem with mod_rewrite rewiterule with
[P](internal pr
The rewrite logs included in the original post indicate that the proxying does
work, so that cannot possibly be the problem.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Joost de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 9:55 AM
To: Ravish Agarwal
Cc: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject
Seems like your rewrite rules are working perfectly! What I am guessing is
happening, is that your login.jsp issues a redirect, and that the request to
this new location returns the 404. In addition to your rewrite logs, your
should take a look in your error and access logs to see if you can fin
Your httpd error log clearly indicates that you are trying to send a request
over SSL to a server which is not SSL enabled. Make sure that you have loaded
mod_ssl. If you are using an Apache source or binary distribution retrieved
from apache.org, make sure Apache is started with "startssl" as a
Although this subject does not seem to be related to Apache, and I have not
been near HP-UX for years...
I had a look at the Siteminder WebAgent Installation guide. There is a section
called "Enabling SHLIB Path for an Agent on Apache2/HP-UX 11" which states: For
the Web Agent to operate to op
I ran a netstat on some of my apache server hosts looking for UDP sockets, but
could not find any. The only UDP sockets I could see were on the NTP port. Then
I tried lsof and could not find anything concerning httpd either.
I am therefore wondering whether you could possibly have a module that
Could it possibly be for communication with a DNS server ? Have you tried
sniffing UDP packets sent to/from this port?
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Richard de Vries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 7:07 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] A
It seems like there is some fundamental misunderstanding about HTTP and the
way the Siteminder WebAgents work.
Let mpe say a few words about the Web Agent.
When the WebAgent (SMWA) (which may either be an Apache module or an
application server plug-in known as TAI) receives a request for a pro
No - that's not possible.
What you can do however, is to use mod_rewrite to retrieve the ssl id from the
client-rproxy connection and insert it as a header into the rproxy-balancer
connection. Search for previous threads on this list about forwarding client
certificate data to a backend server
SetOutputFilter works very well, even in Location filters. There are lots of
happy customers of this feature, using it for such things as for example
compression of response bodies.
Are you quite sure your filter is NOT invoked? Could you possibly have it
generate some output to stderr?
I copi
SetOutputFilter works very well, even in Location filters. There are lots of
happy customers of this feature, using it for such things as for example
compression of response bodies.
Are you quite sure your filter is NOT invoked? Could you possibly have it
generate some output to stderr?
I co
That piece of shit has made me tear all of my hair out, but if you really have
to use it, please make yourself a favor and use the latest and greatest (SMWA
5QMR8). I think I counted something like 160 bug fixes in that release, as
compared to appx. 40 in other releases. Given all the problems I
You need to uncomment "SSLEngine on" in conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf.
SSLProxyEngine is used to activate SSL to the backend server only.
The errors you get (Invalid method in request) are typical of a non-SSL server
receiving an unexpected SSL handshake.
-ascs
F
SetOutputFilter works very well, even in Location filters. There are lots of
happy customers of this feature, using it for such things as for example
compression of response bodies.
Are you quite sure your filter is NOT invoked? Could you possibly have it
generate some output to stderr?
I copi
You are right. It does do port checks. Too bad it cannot determine that the
application server is unavailable based on the HTTP 502 the reverse proxy would
return in that case, and take the server off the list... Did you actually
verify that?
Truly, we abandoned using WebSphere and WebLogic plu
Sorry; I did not really get it the first time around. The reverse proxy is
located between the plugin and WAS.
However I do not see why this should interfere with the work of the WAS plugin
since the latter, as far as I recall, basically just performs routing based on
the contents of the JSESSI
What I did notice though, is that replacing the %2F with / did work. What's the
story about this %2F ?
Unfortunately I'll have to pass on this one. If no-one else replies, you could
do a test using Apache 2.2.2, and possibly file a bug report. You may have more
luck filing a bug report after ha
No it's not. It's mostly used to fix poor HTML code served by the application
server (e.g. absolute URLs), or URL prefixes modified by the proxy server (why
would anyone want to do that anyway ?) thereby breaking links (e.g. http://apache.webthing.com/mod_proxy_html/faq.html
-ascs
___
You've already asked this question in another thread. Please do not hijack
other people's threads. If you do not get a response within a few days, post
again - in the same thread.
-ascs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June
If it were not for the Proxy server, the user would just get a "Connection
refused" or "Unable to connect/Connection timed out" which in my opinion is no
better than that HTTP 502 (Bad Gateway). At least the proxy server gives you
the option of serving a custom error page for the HTTP 502 using
I managed to reproduce this behaviour on Apache 2.0.54 (on Solaris). Wasn't
difficult either. Seems like when the URL contains a %2F (which I believe is a
/ ??), mod_rewrite is never invoked, or silently (no log) declines to handle
the request.
Nevertheless, I do indeed have an idea: why would
Here you go:
RewriteRule ^/seach/(.*) /myscript.php/$1
RewriteRule ^/myscript.php/([a-z])([0-9]+)/(.*) /myscript.php/$3?param_$1=$2
[QSA,N]
RewriteRule ^/myscript.php/([a-z])([0-9]+)$ /myscript.php?param_$1=$2 [QSA,L]
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
Good job. This suddenly rang a bell.
Check Bugzilla PR 15207 and upgrade to Apache 2.0.58 (or at least some version
>= 2.0.55)
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Markus Stockhausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:59 PM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV; us
;%25', '%24', and
'%3B', respectively); this flag prevents this from happening. This allows
percent symbols to appear in the output, as in
RewriteRule /foo/(.*) /bar?arg=P1\%3d$1 [R,NE]
which would turn '/foo/zed' into a safe request for '/bar?arg=P1=zed&#x
I thought there was a flag blocking URL escaping in rewrite rules, but I am
actually unable to find it in the module documentation. Checking the code,
however, I found the following:
bash-2.03$ grep -n NOESCAPE mod_rewrite.h
125:#define RULEFLAG_NOESCAPE 1<<13
128:#define ACTION_NOESCA
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 4:05 PM
To: 'sarvothaman vittal'
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regarding Apache Plugin for weblogic server
Chances are that BEA does not currently support Apache 2.2.
Apache 2.2 is not binary
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:41 PM
To: 'sarvothaman vittal'
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regarding Apache Plugin for weblogic server
There we go. The plugin is not compatible with 2.2.0. I do not know whether BEA
doe
-Original Message-
From: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:24 PM
To: 'sarvothaman vittal'
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regarding Apache Plugin for weblogic server
I suppose you _are_ using Apache 2.0.x ?
What is the output of "http
I have had this kind of problems before, and I seem to remember I even posted a
bug about it.
For your information the error message you get does come from mod_ssl:
bash-2.03$ find . -type f -name \*.c -exec grep -l 'Failed to acquire global
mutex lock' {} \;
./modules/ssl/ssl_engine_mutex.c
b
Are you using mod_ssl ? IN that case what is the value of the SSLMutex property
?
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Steely, Bruce (Mission Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:07 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Invalid argument: Failed
What do you get when you execute
file /etc/httpd/modules/mod_wl_20.so ??
-ascs
From: sarvothaman vittal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 9:43 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECT
I see you are using Apache 2.0.46. I seem to remember that there once was a bug
in mod_cache causing stale entries not to be replaced in certain versions of
Apache 2.0. Apache 2.0.46 may be one of the versions affected by this problem.
That would cause the cache provider to decline to serve the
> Anyway- looking at the log lines he sent later, perhaps this gives a clue:
Very clever. I can't believe I missed this.
> Maybe this hostname is confusing mod_cache somehow. The fact that it is
> caching the URL, but then doesn't serve from cache because nobody thinks they
> have it tells me
Well, the second response is definitively not served from cache (nor the first
one for that matter). The cache provider definitively tries to store the
response (measning that there is nothing in the headers preventing the response
from being cached) in both cases and declines to serve the respo
This is definitely not the same problem.
First of all the problem was fixed in 2.2.1 and the original poster reports
using 2.2.2.
Second, I do not see any mention of caching the response under the key
http://_default_:80/ like in your case.
Frankly, I do not see anything indicating the respon
s@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
>> Rules below would be tested, but they wouldn't match unless the pattern
>> starts with scheme + :// + url-path.
>
> unless the RewriteCond pattern starts with /. The above matches ju
Could you give some explanations wrt. your RewriteCond ? I have never seen
this kind of expressions before.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ionescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 7:55 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewrite rule
7:36 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> The L is not necessary since the redirect is immediate.
Rules below would be tested, but they wouldn't match unless the pattern starts
with scheme + :// + url-path.
Only other status codes t
Your statement is wrong. The saves $2 and $3 are definitely known at that stage
of the rewriting process. The RewriteRule pattern is the first to be evaluated.
Check the mod_rewrite manual page. You can also test it for yourself with
RewriteLogLevel 3
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Ma
Seems almost right to me. If you want the querystring appended, you need to use
the QSA option. The L is not necessary since the redirect is immediate.
RewriteRule ^/directoryone/directorytwo/(mypage\.php)$ /$1 [R=301,QSA]
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ionescu [mailto:[EMAIL P
It is really hard to understand exactly what your problem is because your
description is so sketchy. My understanding is that when you request
http://pippo/ntop/showPlugins.html?icmpWatch, the backend server issues a
redirect to http://localhost:3000/plugins/icmpWatch which you expect the
rev
Although you do not specify which version of Apache you are using, I assume
that you are using 2.0.55 or newer.
AFAIK this problem does not exist in Apache 2.0.54 (or at least I have not
experienced it) with which I use rewrite rules quite extensively. Therefore I
think that you could replace t
There must be something more to this, because there is no reason why the user
agent should encode differently depending on the server to which the request is
sent. At the time the request is sent, the browser does not even know what kind
of server it is sending the request to, and reverse proxie
directives:
ProxyPass /path/to/exception !
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Avraham Shapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 10:05 PM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV; users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyPassReverse on Windows
Importance: Low
** Low
ECTED] Exceeded the limit of 10 subrequest nesting
levels ...
Removing Indexes does not help either.
The debug messages just point to the actual directory.
So the needle is still not found .
Kjell
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> It's a little like the famous needle in a hayst
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 1:17 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exceeded the limit of 10 subrequest nesting
levels ...
No, I do'nt think so.
Kjell
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
> Would you by any chance be using m
Would you by any chance be using mod_rewrite ??
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Kjell Eidem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:10 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exceeded the limit of 10 subrequest nesting levels
...
Hi List.
The followin
Replace
ProxyPass http://tswwma.lib.loc.gov/ http://192.168.0.2/
ProxyPassReverse http://tswwma.lib.loc.gov/ http://192.168.0.2/
with
ProxyPass/ http://192.168.0.2/
ProxyPassReverse / http://192.168.0.2/
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Avraham Shapi
I know that there have been problems with KeepAlive and IE when using https,
but not between Apache and IIS.
Would you by any chance know what the IIS KeepAlive timeout is? Might it
possibly be shorter than the Apache KeepAliveTimeout ? Does this only happen on
"long" requests (timeout of the b
I assume that your problem is due to the fact that the Windows file names are
case insensitive, whereas filenames on Unices are case sensitive. In that case
I believe there is nothing much you can do other than correcting all the links
in the HTML code, unless you want to rewrite all URL paths o
Remove the Indexes option from the list of Options for every Location/Directory
section of your configuration.
For example change:
Options Indexes FollowSymlinks
Order Deny,Allow
Allow all
to:
Options FollowSymlinks
Order Deny,Allow
Allow all
If you load mod_
ServerLimit is what you are looking for if you are using Apache 2.x
Otherwise (Apache 1.3), it is MaxChild.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Kaushal Shriyan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:13 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Query
Hi
How c
And in addition to this, if you run the Apache servers on Solaris, you may turn
on NFS caching.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:19 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hosting off of Sha
(or maybe even http://andy/webapp) to your
configuration.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Bo Najdrovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:26 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https to http proxy with Apache
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
>
You need to be more specific about httpd and OS versions, as well as a list of
the modules used.
There have been memory leaks in some modules in the past, like a leak in the
handling of rewrite maps for example. You could also search the Apache bug site.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From:
In that case my guess is that it is the application that generates erroneous
redirect URLs. Had tomcat generated the redirect URLs, theyr would have
contained the port number also, e.g. http://andy:8012/
Keep your configuration the way it is (ProxyPreserveHost Off) and add the
following to the
, May 12, 2006 3:30 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Proxy errors
Thanks for this - I've tried changing the timeout so I'll see what happens.
Is it possible to catch the error and display something nicer instead?
cheers
Matt
on 12/05/2006 10:27 Axel-Stéphan
VPN/IPsec solutions might also be considered in order to restrict access from
the Internet to only those able to establish a secure session... That would
restrict the number of users who would be able to probe the webmail gizmo.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Boyle Owen [mailto:[EMAIL P
Unless you are doing this in order to familiarise yourself with writing modules
for Apache 2.0, I strongly suggest you use a module that already exists and
that provides a lot more flexibility than you module does. That module happens
to be mod_rewrite (funny how often it saves the day!) Combine
I guess the response to the POST is a redirect (302) which is not rewritten by
any of the ProxyPassReverse directives. In that case the URL of the Location
header probably starts with http://andy:port/ instead of
https://my.reverse.proxy.com/
What you need to do is figure out exactly what the v
The error you are referring to is generated during the processing of the
backend server response. It may be due to the backend server closing the
connection, or the connection timing out.
The timeout is 5 minutes by default, so unless the request really takes that
long to process, I think it is
>From what I understand you proxy to an application that generates HTML or
>other contents where there are absolute references to other resources on the
>same server.
What you should convince your dev team about is to generate links that do not
contain scheme://server:port but only the url-path
I think this question would better be submitted to the developpers' list.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Okamoto Toshiaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:06 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Question]error_log
Hi Alls:
I have two questio
Given the e-mail address of the original poster, I assume he is setting up an
Apache server in a professional context, and I would be very much surprised if
the provider did any kind of filtering. Chances are that they are their own
provider anyway...
It is much more likely he needs to talk to
No need to reinstall Apache. This is only a configuration issue.
You need to tell Apache where to find the
- Server certificate
- Private key associated with the server certificate
- CA Certificate
>From your httpd.conf file, you probably include a configuration file called
>ssl.conf. This incl
If this is really an issue, you could write a script (using curl) that requests
all of the images through you caching (reverse?) proxy in order to prime the
cache...
-ascs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:36 AM
T
You'll find a tutorial on CGI here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/howto/cgi.html
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Broun Emmanuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:38 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Running Batchfiles
Please help me ho
What do you expect Reference/Glossary should be rewritten to ?
As far as I can tell from your rewrite rules, Reference/Glossary and
Reference/Glossary/ should be rewritten into Reference/index.php?ref=Glossary.
If that is not the case, you should turn on the rewrite logs at a log level of
at
The requests will actually be processed by the rules of the correct named
virtual host (according to the host header); the only problem is that the
certificate the server will use for authenticating to the client is the one
defined in the first of the virtual hosts. At the time of SSL session
e
Start by reading the mod_filter documentation.
-ascs
From: Tiago Semprebom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:51 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add new Handler/Filter in Apache 2.0
I need to insert a new Handle
Can you see any reason why it would be looking for Apache header files under
/tmp/httpd-2.0.55 ?? Did you by any chance at some point untar the Apache
distrib under /tmp, run the configure script and then copy /tmp/httpd-2.0.55 to
/export/home/netiq/sol ?
-ascs
That's called "reverse proxying". Have a look at mod_proxy.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Claridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:22 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect question
Hi,
This might seem like a really stoopid q
IETF RFC2616 (www.ietf.org)
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Michael Conlen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 5:19 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_cache
I'm considering using mod_cache for a server but I haven't seen any
documentation on ho
Make those links relative instead of absolute, i.e. yank the scheme://host
part. That will do the trick
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Warhurst, SI (Spencer) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 5:45 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL
What 'bout this?
RewriteRule ^/About/([^/]+)/?$ /About/index.php?bout=$1 [L]
RewriteCond $1 !=About
RewriteRule ^/([^/]+)/?$ /index.php?home=$1 [L]
-ascs
From: David Blomstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 2:59 PM
To: users@httpd.ap
There has previously been some discussion on this list about the virtues of
memory caching versus disk caching. As I recall nobody ever claimed to have
observed performance gains using mod_mem_cache. I have myself not bothered to
run any load tests in an attempt to measure the benefits of mod_m
I had a similar problem when using both mod_mem_cache and mod_disk cache with
Apache 2.0.54. I ended up abandoning mod_mem_cache and never experienced the
problem again. I may even have posted a bug report... but back then mod_cache
did not get much TLD from developers who were, as I understand
Your requirements are spinning around in my head and I am a little confused :-)
but if that's what you need, your rules seem good to me.
You can trace every step of the rewriting process in the rewrite log, so you
should easily be able to adjust your rules according to what you observe in the
I am afraid that mod_rewrite will process the request *before* mod_vhost_alias.
Therefore, in order to achieve what you want, I think you will need to abandon
mod_vhost_alias and rely solely on mod_rewrite.
For the user directories, maybe:
RewriteMaplowercase int:tolower
RewriteCond %{HT
1 - 100 of 407 matches
Mail list logo
