On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 1:31 PM David Lopez
wrote:
>
> Dear Eric, I thought so too. But as I said, it can be tested with LATEST
> official download packages/releases available. What we both saw was not a
> definite solution. Thanks for your kind comment.
1.7.1 wasn't released when you tested. Ha
Dear Eric, I thought so too. But as I said, it can be tested with LATEST
official download packages/releases available. What we both saw was not a
definite solution. Thanks for your kind comment.
En jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 9:42:32 GMT-5, Eric Covener
escribió:
On Sun, Jan 29, 20
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 9:56 AM David Lopez
wrote:
>
> This is a very subtle bug that has been around in latest software since a few
> months ago. In different forums you will see it reported in different
> packages of different kinds of software and manufacturers.
>
> Concretely in Apache we ca
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:12 AM Antony Stone
wrote:
>
> On Thursday 02 February 2023 at 11:02:26, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On freshly installed Apache 2.4.52 on Fedora with default
> > configuration I'm observing that for HEAD response the Content-Length
> > header is not being sen
On Thursday 02 February 2023 at 11:02:26, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On freshly installed Apache 2.4.52 on Fedora with default
> configuration I'm observing that for HEAD response the Content-Length
> header is not being sent for empty files
Content-length is not a required field for Head
Hi,
On freshly installed Apache 2.4.52 on Fedora with default
configuration I'm observing that for HEAD response the Content-Length
header is not being sent for empty files (it is present for non-empty
files). When changing HEAD to GET the header is present for such
files.
Sidney Shek asked very s
