Re: [users@httpd] perhaps off topic..

2023-01-10 Thread Frank Gingras
That isn't really related to the purpose of this mailing list. I would ask the relevant channels on the libera chat IRC network to get more useful feedback first. On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:34 PM bruce wrote: > looking at node/react vs php... > > For those of you familiar with both, is there much

[users@httpd] perhaps off topic..

2023-01-10 Thread bruce
looking at node/react vs php... For those of you familiar with both, is there much of a difference/learning curve? I'm simply looking to test/perhaps mod a basic Landing page/marketing react app from github, and implement email/form-data gathering. thanks for comments --

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-10 Thread Frank Gingras
Do a quick test, and enable the rewrite log. Make sure you use a log level of 5 to see those details. On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:28 PM sebb wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:21, Frank Gingras wrote: > > > > The implicit behaviour for multiple RewriteCond directives is AND, > unless you use [OR]

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-10 Thread sebb
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:21, Frank Gingras wrote: > > The implicit behaviour for multiple RewriteCond directives is AND, unless you > use [OR]. Yes, that is documented. > So without [OR], all the conditions have to match to apply the rewrite rule. Yes, but are any subsequent conditions evalua

Re: [users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-10 Thread Frank Gingras
The implicit behaviour for multiple RewriteCond directives is AND, unless you use [OR]. So without [OR], all the conditions have to match to apply the rewrite rule. On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 6:06 PM sebb wrote: > Does the first RewriteCond that fails cause any following RewriteCond > entries to b

[users@httpd] RewriteCond - is this fast fail?

2023-01-10 Thread sebb
Does the first RewriteCond that fails cause any following RewriteCond entries to be skipped? (up to the RewriteRule) I would hope that is the case, but AFAICT it is not explicitly stated. If it is the case, perhaps it would be worth making explicit? (and suggesting that the cheapest checks are do