Re: [users@httpd] Re: Comments unusable?

2019-06-19 Thread hjenkins
Thank you all for the advice. I'm afraid I'd somehow missed those bugs. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-15947 seems to be the active bug. It currently has no votes. Commented/wikified docs are a great idea. I'll try to remember to come by and comment when comments are back up. > Hi,

Re: [users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

2019-06-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 19 Jun 2019, at 09:00, Bret Stern wrote: > Your original post log error indicated: > > No such file or directory: AH01241: exec of '/usr/local/www/bi/cgi- > local/b4.pl' failed > > Perhaps the path for cgi scripts has been changed/redifined from the > default in the apache config file # ls

Re: [users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

2019-06-19 Thread Bret Stern
Your original post log error indicated: No such file or directory: AH01241: exec of '/usr/local/www/bi/cgi- local/b4.pl' failed Perhaps the path for cgi scripts has been changed/redifined from the default in the apache config file On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 08:11 -0600, @lbutlr wrote: > On 19 Ju

Re: [users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

2019-06-19 Thread @lbutlr
On 19 Jun 2019, at 00:25, bret_st...@machinemanagement.com wrote: > Permissions on the executable/.pl > script correct to run when called? Permissions are the same they’ve been since 2004, 777. On 19 Jun 2019, at 05:07, Eric Covener wrote: > bad shebang in the file itself? Suspicious that you

Re: [users@httpd] Adding perl-cgi in apache 2.4

2019-06-19 Thread Eric Covener
> > # perl cgi-local/b4.pl bad shebang in the file itself? Suspicious that you added "perl" in front explicitly. If you don't want to run it via its defined interpreter, which is what mod_cgi does, you'd need something like Action to pass it as an argument to some wrapper. -