Hello,
I was tinkering over the weekend with mod_authz_dbd and mysql, and i could not
get a RequireAny/RequireAll to match on multiple Require dbd-group statements.
It would always match only the last result from the query, but once for every
row in the resultset.
Example:
[^/]+)/">
On 11/05/15 18:26, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> I look constantly for new outlets etc. this exercise came about only
> last week whilst
> checking background info using Statcrops.com. This indicated (after an
> afternoons work)
> that 5 Domains were using the exact same Apache server ref. as well as
> the
There is no such thing as "directly with Apache!"
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) provides a home for multiple
open-source projects, including the HTTPD server.
There is no one at ASF who can help you other than to direct you to the
project support webpage:
http://httpd.apache.org/support.htm
1. It is considered rude to reply to an individual instead of to the entire
mailing list when you have follow-up questions. Many people on the HTTPD
list - including me - charge for consulting services, but answer questions
in a public forum to help everyone learn more.
2. As I already said, the E
E-tags are generated based on information about the file being served.
You can see the documentation here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#fileetag
As you noted, Apache HTTPD is used by a significant number of people all
over the world.
There is no central registry of who owns a
Hi Steve,
ETag numbers are - roughly - checksums of the files being requested
which can be used in caching mechanisms.
The only directive in the configuration of an Apache HTTP server
directly related to the ETag validator is 'FileETag':
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#fileetag
Sirs,
Don't know if I'm following the correct protocol! This is the enquiry I sent
Eric he
informed that I should join this format.
I would like an answer to the questions below if possible.
regards Steve
- Original Message -
From: steve owen
To: webmas...@apache.org
Sent: Mon Ma
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:30 AM, wrote:
>
> Do you mean - building 2.2.29 from apache.org sources ?
Yes, at least for testing purpose.
This would help backporting the change from 2.4.x to 2.2.x.
Regards,
Yann.
-
To unsubscrib
Hello,
Well - a patched version... what do you mean -i've build
apache22-2.2.29_2 from ports... so its already up to date. However
openssl runtime is openssl-1.0.1_16, where i see there is a
openssl-1.0.2_1 available from ports. I prefer to build from ports, in
order to host a standardized en
