RE: [users@httpd] Deny didn't work

2015-05-04 Thread Joshua Smith
Thanks for your replies. I'm using apache version 2.2.15 - so I guess I don't have to worry about the 2.4 changes. I'll have to research AllowOverride Very interesting - seems obvious now that you say it, but I didn't realize my efforts were just blocking the response, not the request. I t

Re: [users@httpd] Deny didn't work

2015-05-04 Thread Richard
Also "allow/deny" (or the 2.4 equiv) directives only control whether the server delivers the content, not whether the client can request an item from the server. I.e., the indication of successful blocking will be the response code changing from 200 to 403, but you'll still likely see hits. If you

Re: [users@httpd] Deny didn't work

2015-05-04 Thread Yehuda Katz
What version of Apache are you using? Apache 2.4 changed the access control directives unless you specifically enable the old style: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html#access Also, make sure you have the correct AllowOverride statements. - Y On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Joshua Sm

[users@httpd] Deny didn't work

2015-05-04 Thread Joshua Smith
Hi, I tried both of the following methods to block an ip address, but neither worked. In .htaccess, I put: Order Deny,Allow Deny from 123.123.123.123 and RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^123.123.123.123 RewriteRule .* /maintenance.html [R=503,L] (I do have the mod_rewrite module instal

Re: [users@httpd] Apache httpd have it's own repo?

2015-05-04 Thread Andy Wang
On 05/04/2015 01:28 PM, Rose, John B wrote: It looks like the yum repo for httpd for Red Hat 7 just has httpd 2.4.6 Does Apache have it's own repo? We have looked around a bit but not found it. We assume that would be a more recent version. No. The apache org only provides source code for ht

[users@httpd] Apache httpd have it's own repo?

2015-05-04 Thread Rose, John B
It looks like the yum repo for httpd for Red Hat 7 just has httpd 2.4.6 Does Apache have it's own repo? We have looked around a bit but not found it. We assume that would be a more recent version.

Re: [users@httpd] LongPolling/WebSockets connection handling & max. connections

2015-05-04 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:36 AM, wrote: > Are there any experiences about the maximum number of web socket connections > and best practices for the Apache by using web sockets? Is it better to run > apache with the event mpm then the worker mpm within that scenario? For websockets the event MPM

[users@httpd] LongPolling/WebSockets connection handling & max. connections

2015-05-04 Thread Andre.Wendel
Hello everybody, currently I'm having an open question/topic about web sockets and long polling, which I'm not completely sure about the current handling within the Apache web server. The main question is about the mechanism "how websockets connections will be handled from the Apache?". Curre

[users@httpd] proxypass strip the URL

2015-05-04 Thread pradeepkumar tanguturi
HI I am have an issue when the apache 2.2 proxypass the URL with filename has "=". when is proxypass it strip the any character before "=" character E.g  https://apple.com/test/file=test1.xml it pass as  https://apple.com/test/test1.xml. it stripping all the character before it pass. Any help wil

Re: [users@httpd] Handling MS "Internet Shortcuts" and "Links"

2015-05-04 Thread David A. Cobb
On 04-May-15 06:09, Rainer Canavan wrote: 2015-05-01 16:00 GMT+02:00 David A. Cobb : [...] However, if I click the URL file in a "Directory List" served from Apache, I get the plain text file displayed. I can go to the target with one or two extra steps, but it's a PITA. It's a text file, so

Re: [users@httpd] Handling MS "Internet Shortcuts" and "Links"

2015-05-04 Thread Rainer Canavan
2015-05-01 16:00 GMT+02:00 David A. Cobb : [...] > However, if I click the URL file in a "Directory List" served from Apache, I > get the plain text file displayed. I can go to the target with one or two > extra steps, but it's a PITA. It's a text file, so that's the expected result, since there