RE: [users@httpd] .MSI Files?

I appreciate it, Yehuda! Thanks… Cathy Fauntleroy, Security+ Van Dyke Technology Group Email: cathy.fauntle...@vdtg.com Office: (443) 832-4768 From: Yehuda Katz [mailto:yeh...@ymkatz.net] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 1:48 PM To: users@httpd.apa

Re: [users@httpd] .MSI Files?

There are no Apache committers who build Windows binaries. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/platform/windows.html#down You can get binaries from other sources - I usually use ApacheLounge. None of these source build an MSI of Apache by itself. The recommended installation method is to downloa

[users@httpd] .MSI Files?

Users, Why can't I find a .msi for any version except Apache 2.2.24 w/OpenSSL 0.9.8? I've looked at so many sites that my eyes are tired. If anyone can tell me where I can locate one for download and install on my Windows 2008 server, you have no idea how much I would appreciate it! Th

[users@httpd] Sorry AGAIN wrong list --Re: spam

Sorry again to the httpd team. It's not my intention to troll for more committers on the SA project by posting here. ;-) Nope, my issue is a very simple problem some other Thunderbird users might understand in that there have been problems where the address book has suddenly forgotten the mos

Re: [users@httpd] Re: spam

Still the wrong list :) On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Sorry, it is not our job to provide support for GetResponse.com Their > answer is wrong and as best I can tell they have old rules and need to look > at running sa-update. Telling you to "consult" with us is co

[users@httpd] Re: spam

Sorry, it is not our job to provide support for GetResponse.com Their answer is wrong and as best I can tell they have old rules and need to look at running sa-update. Telling you to "consult" with us is completely wrong. Research the product, read our website, sure. They are clear about tha

[users@httpd] Ignore, wrong list, sorry - Re: Fwd: Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

On 4/16/2015 6:54 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC > with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been > hit by DCC which is completely by design. Vernon replied off-list so I wanted to bring the relevant port

Re: [users@httpd] Fwd: Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

Probably the wrong mailing list ;) Regards, Yann. On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC >> with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been >> hit by DCC which is completely by desig

[users@httpd] Fwd: Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

> Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC > with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been > hit by DCC which is completely by design. Vernon replied off-list so I wanted to bring the relevant portion back to the list: "My general suggestion