Thank you for the answer. I removed all .c extensions from the
modules. Also, replaced the names with their directives, but no
success.
The modules are installed into /etc/httpd/modules which is also
correct in configuration. Can we somehow see which line causes the
problem? I have removed all ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/01/2014 04:30 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> The REQUEST_URI doesn't contain a hostname. Just the path
> component of the URL.
>
Having *.massamio.com point to the one IP address then:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} =info.massamio.co
Thanks for that lead. These rules ARE in a 'Directory' block so this is the
case. It looks like I can resolve this by placing a 'catch-all' after the first
'xyz-static-content' rewrite:
RewriteRule ^xyz-static-content_[A-Z0-9a-z._-]+/(.*)$ xyz-static-content/$1
RewriteRule ^xyz-static-content -
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Lesley Kimmel
wrote:
> It seems that even the 'xyz-static-content' requests are falling through
> to, and matching, the proxy statement despite the 'L|Last' flag. Can anyone
> explain this behavior? I'm trying to use the second set of rules to avoid
> having to rew
All;
I have an application being proxied through Apache which is also serving some
static content for the web application. The application is '/xyz(.*)' and the
static content is '/xyz-static-content'. The requests for the static content
come in as '/xyz_' and have to be rewritten to '/xyz-stat
Try leaving off the ".c" so mod_headers.c becomes mod_headers and so
on. Double check that the path is correct also.
On 10/03/2014 08:36 AM, Volkan Gezer wrote:
> I am using Arch linux and trying to set up development environment of
> ownCloud and I am receiving a 500 error:
>
> [Wed Oct 01 01:17
I am using Arch linux and trying to set up development environment of
ownCloud and I am receiving a 500 error:
[Wed Oct 01 01:17:50.901758 2014] [core:alert] [pid 32084] [client
::1:44681] /srv/http/owncloud/.htaccess: Invalid command '
SetEnvIfNoCase ^Authorization$ "(.+)" XAUTHORIZATION=$1
Req
Why should it five any problems? As long as you point correctly to the
specific balancer group in your proxypass directives everything should be
ok.
El 03/10/2014 03:33, "Esmond Pitt" escribió:
> I have a situation where I may have to do some context-dependent
> balancer routing.
>
> I presently
