Re: [users@httpd] mod_access_compat issue

> I think that controls the interaction between user authentication > and host authentication. I'm not using any user authentication. > However, adding 'Satisfy any' fixes it. Is that because the > host authentication is still denying access, but the default user > authentication is to allow? Or be

[users@httpd] Proxy Reverse + Jboss https

Hello. This is the first time I post something here, because whenever I had a question always found the solution at some old topic. But this time I have not found something that works. So let the doubt: ENVIRONMENT: Apache 2.2 (HTTPS) => Jboss 4.2.3 (HTTPS) I have an application running on JBoss,

Re: [users@httpd] mod_access_compat issue

On 26 Jun 2014, at 19:25, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: >> Is there something I am missing here? > > They are not exactly equivalent, they are on separate sides of the > "Satisfy" check. The default is "Satisfy all". Hmm... I think that controls th

Re: [users@httpd] mod_access_compat issue

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Alex Bligh wrote: > Is there something I am missing here? They are not exactly equivalent, they are on separate sides of the "Satisfy" check. The default is "Satisfy all". -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com --

[users@httpd] mod_access_compat issue

I have a site configuration that I would like to work on apache 2.4 # apache2ctl -v Server version: Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) Server built: Apr 3 2014 12:20:28 Apache 2.4 (on Ubuntu 14.04) is more picky than 2.2 on Ubuntu 12.04 about directory permissions. This is due to the inclusion of the follo

[users@httpd] Apache, http 1.0 and content length

Hi all, I'm trying to debug a client app, which seems not able to handle chunked encoding but needs Content-length set. My configuration is apache 2.2 -> mod_jk 1.30 -> tomcat 6.0.x. I forced http 1.0 so chunked encoding doesn't get used adding this: SetEnv downgrade-1.0 so far s

AW: [users@httpd] Client certificate auth behind f5 loadbalancer

Why do you terminate the ssl on the F5 and not on the Apache-backend? We load balance IP/Port-based on the F5 and terminate the SSL on the Apache backend, so you would be able to turn on your SSLEngine and Proxy the SSL from the F5 on the SSL Standard SSL Port 443 of the Apache and you can do ev

Re: [users@httpd] MaxClients exceeded error message

On 25/06/2014 15:38, Jeff Trawick wrote: ... requests. What are the effects of MaxClient limit being exceeded? delays in processing new connections depending on load and MaxClients and ListenBacklogs, some new connections might even get rejected thanks Should I have seen an er

Re: [users@httpd] Left out .c on config file

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Brent Clark wrote: > Good day Guys > > I one of my apache config files, I left out the .c > > > that's fine > > Does that mean apache will no see or use the module? > not a problem > Do I have to use > no, not the right form You can use either of these f

[users@httpd] Left out .c on config file

Good day Guys I one of my apache config files, I left out the .c Does that mean apache will no see or use the module? Do I have to use Regards Brent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For addition

[users@httpd] File 'cache/I/9/*****.header' has a version mismatch. File had version: xxxx

Hi community! I'm running Apache 2.4.4 on a Windows 2012 Standard Server. It is a caching reverse proxy. I get a lot of cache_disk errors in the logfiles: [log] [Thu Jun 12 13:25:43.147301 2014] [cache_disk:error] [pid 33044:tid 2544] [client X.X.X.X:10178] AH00705: File 'cache/I/9/4JRTaMjqqNUQo7

Re: [users@httpd] Windows Apache 2.4.9 restarts itself

Hi, Thank you for the response! I looked into child.c, and see that the first line in Error log: (OS 6)The handle is invalid. : AH00356: Child: WAIT_FAILED -- shutting down server comes from: child.c Line 1125+: rv = WaitForMultipleObjects(num_events, (HANDLE *)child_events, FALSE, …… This is th