Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Brett @Google
In addition, it is also useful to add "-xarch=native and -xcode=pic32" to CFLAGS -xcode=pic32 helps linking with .so libraries which are not solaris-savvy (the equivalent of linux's -G / -fPIC) -xarch=native will optimise the code for the same machine it is compiling on (good if all your machines

[users@httpd] Apache Admin button on XAMPP Control Panel for non-80 port

2014-04-25 Thread Carl Hruska
Hello everyone, I have a small problem with the Admin button on the XAMPP Control Panel. Please read the following information pertaining to this problem and reply with suggestions (any suggestions; I'm not afraid to research.). Any help will be greatly appreciated. THE PROBLEM: The problem I

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Jesus Cea
On 25/04/14 22:48, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:43 PM, venu thangalapally wrote: >> can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 >> tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information > > The bit level is not really a property of sour

[users@httpd] Re: Conditional response body modification

2014-04-25 Thread Doug Strick
> In 2.4, it seems like you should be able to register mod_substitute > via mod_filter. mod_filter has a "match" parameter that in 2.4 is an > ap_expr expression, so it can ready basically anything floating around > in the server. > > mod_filter can be pretty intimidating though. I really wish I

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Conditional response body modification

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
> Anyone > have any ideas how I can make the HTTP_COOKIE data available to > mod_substitute? Let me know if I'm completely off base here in > understanding what this module can do as well. Thanks In 2.4, it seems like you should be able to register mod_substitute via mod_filter. mod_filter has

[users@httpd] Re: Conditional response body modification

2014-04-25 Thread Doug Strick
I wasn't able to come up with anything further on the mod_ext_filter solution. I did come across mod_parp ( http://parp.sourceforge.net). It says it's able to parse the request data and make it available to other apache modules. I've gotten it compiled and enabled o

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:43 PM, venu thangalapally wrote: > can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache > 2.2 tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information > Build apr, apr-util, and httpd with CC="cc -m64" ./configure ... Replace cc with gcc if n

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:43 PM, venu thangalapally wrote: > can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 > tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information The bit level is not really a property of source code. You'll have to consult the manual for

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread venu thangalapally
can you please provide more info how can i build it to 64-bit... apache 2.2 tar file from apache link does not say the bit level information Regards Venu On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:40 PM, venu thangalapally > wrote: > > Guys.. do we have a

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:40 PM, venu thangalapally wrote: > Guys.. do we have a 32-bit and 64-bit apache 2.2.27 http server ? for > soalris ? > You can build it either way. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apac

[users@httpd] apache 2.2.7 bit level info

2014-04-25 Thread venu thangalapally
Guys.. do we have a 32-bit and 64-bit apache 2.2.27 http server ? for soalris ? Regards Venu

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Processes in Windows

2014-04-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Dino B. wrote: > Hi Apache experts, > > This is my first post to an Apache group, so please bear with me. I am > also new to Apache in general. > > My understanding is that under windows, there should be only 2 httpd > processes once I start my Apache server (ver

FW: Re: FW: [users@httpd] Help with Virtual Hosting on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2014-04-25 Thread Roy Hinkelman - Technical Services
Thanks, that worked. I had multiple listen directives. I cleared httpd.conf ( tried some code and left it there accidentally ) and removed "listen 80" from sites-available/example.com VHost settings Another thread advised the use of "restart" instead of "reload" in "service apache2 restart"

[users@httpd] Apache Processes in Windows

2014-04-25 Thread Dino B.
Hi Apache experts, This is my first post to an Apache group, so please bear with me. I am also new to Apache in general. My understanding is that under windows, there should be only 2 httpd processes once I start my Apache server (version 2.2). One parent and one child. The child then spawns m

Re: FW: [users@httpd] Help with Virtual Hosting on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2014-04-25 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Roy Hinkelman - Technical Services wrote: > This site, for 2.4, https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html > , says to "simply" put the VirtualHost info into httpd.conf. FireFox says > "Unable to Connect" Missing a Listen directive, or a firewall pro

FW: [users@httpd] Help with Virtual Hosting on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu 12.04.4

2014-04-25 Thread Roy Hinkelman - Technical Services
Is there a preferred way to set up vhosts on Linux 3.2 / Ubuntu? When searching, I find conflicting ways of setting this up. This site, for 2.4, https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html , says to "simply" put the VirtualHost info into httpd.conf. FireFox says "Unable to Connec

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 Proxy Connect - connection reset

2014-04-25 Thread Vladimir-M. Obelic
Hello, I have a working setup with apache 2.2 server acting as a remote proxy. I'm using proxytunnel with two chained proxies: proxytunnel -q -X -p localproxy:8080 -r remoteproxy:443 -d destination:22 I had to apply a patch for SSL to work though: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?