Re: [users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread Colin 't Hart
Actually, it would be quite easy to unzip an Apache 2.4 build (or even just a newer 2.2 build) next to the existing 2.2 install and configure it. Shut down the existing 2.2 and start up the new 2.4 (or the new 2.2). It might take a few goes back-n-forth, but if you can afford a little down time thi

Re: [users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread Nick Tkach
Yes, if it's an option I'd *strongly* urge you to clone one of the servers you're needing to upgrade (at least in terms of the Apache) and try the upgrade there. If you can clone it as a VM of some sort that would work even better because you could set everything up, snapshot it, do your work, and

Re: [users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:27:39 -0400 "SHERMAN Matt (CANBERRA)" wrote: > As Tim said earlier, it was an in-house IT Administrator that > originally installed this to work in conjunction with PHP. It was > installed years ago, and the administrator has since left the > company. Can you tell us what t

RE: [users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread Tim Charron
Thanks for that feed back, the OS is Windows 2003 R2 SP1 From: John Hudak [mailto:jjhu...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 12:16 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] New to apache I am a little surprised that they didn't recommend updating to 2.2.25 (the latest in

Re: [users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread John Hudak
I am a little surprised that they didn't recommend updating to 2.2.25 (the latest in the 2.2.x branch) or move up to 2.4.x branch. In any case. What OS are you using? I don't have the changes/issues from 2.2.9 through 2.2.15 in my headIf you read the release notes for those versions, th

Re: [users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:24:30 + Tim Charron wrote: > The person who installed apache for has left and we recently had a > security audit done that recommended we upgrade our Apache 2.2.9 > installation to 2.2.15 or later. I have searched trying to find > information on how to do this upgrade an

Re: [users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread Mike Rumph
Hello Tim, You could be begin with the Apache httpd 2.2 upgrade instructions at the following link: - http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/install.html#upgrading Please, let us know what specific issues you run into. Thanks, Mike Rumph On 10/2/2013 8:24 AM, Tim Charron wrote: Good Morning, The

[users@httpd] New to apache

2013-10-02 Thread Tim Charron
Good Morning, The person who installed apache for has left and we recently had a security audit done that recommended we upgrade our Apache 2.2.9 installation to 2.2.15 or later. I have searched trying to find information on how to do this upgrade and whether or not it will break something and

Re: [users@httpd] AuthType Digest or AuthType Basic not workin in Apache 2.4.6

2013-10-02 Thread Ezra Taylor
Eric: It doesn't show that the 401 is being used. I got straight to the page. On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Ezra Taylor > wrote: > > Hello All: > > > >I've been banging on this issues for a couple of days now. I > > ha

Re: [users@httpd] AuthType Digest or AuthType Basic not workin in Apache 2.4.6

2013-10-02 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Ezra Taylor wrote: > Hello All: > >I've been banging on this issues for a couple of days now. I > have all modules installed and can't get AuthType Basic or AuthType Digest > to work. I even have a setup for LDAP that doesn't work. The same setup > w

Re: [users@httpd] Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?

2013-10-02 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 1:35 AM, John McIntyre wrote: > Le 1 octobre 2013 à 22:25, Eric Covener a écrit : > > Don't use domains or IP addresses inside or > NameVirtualHost. It's causing two sets of name-based vhosts. Use > *:80. > > > Hi, > When I did that, and restarted the server and then wen