[users@httpd] Re: apache 2.4

2013-09-04 Thread LuKreme
On 04 Sep 2013, at 07:20 , Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, LuKreme wrote: >> >> Is it the case that in apache 2.4 you must add a directory structure for >> every directory you want to access and then add explicit allow permissions >> for that directory? >> >> For examp

Re: [users@httpd] Rate limiting

2013-09-04 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
On 2013-09-02 20:15, Geoff Millikan wrote: Since this is a common request I'd love to see someone put together a "best practices, solutions and examples" post for the community. DOS treatment is IMHO the same as for SPAM and Viruses: there should not be a common way to do it, as far as bad gu

Re: [users@httpd] apache 2.4

2013-09-04 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, LuKreme wrote: > > Is it the case that in apache 2.4 you must add a directory structure for > every directory you want to access and then add explicit allow permissions > for that directory? > > For example, despite having added /usr/local/www to the apache config

[users@httpd] apache 2.4

2013-09-04 Thread LuKreme
Is it the case that in apache 2.4 you must add a directory structure for every directory you want to access and then add explicit allow permissions for that directory? For example, despite having added /usr/local/www to the apache config Options +Indexes +FollowSymLinks +Includes -SymLink

Re: [users@httpd] cgi interpreters

2013-09-04 Thread azurIt
>On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:05 PM, azurIt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> is it, somehow, possible to set CGI script interpreters in linux? For >> example: >> - interpterer for .py is /usr/bin/python >> - .sh is /bin/bash >> etc. > >Check out the Action directive. You'll probably need to write a small wrapper