Re: [users@httpd] GZIP DEFLATE and HTTPD

2013-08-08 Thread Akash Jain
Thanks a lot Ben. That helped. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Akash Jain > wrote: > > Per Akamai Guy, Vary shows akamai that content can vary so akamai is not > > caching, and this leading akamai to make requests to our webversion ... > > We m

Re: [users@httpd] mod_rewrite question

2013-08-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Noah Duffy wrote: > On Aug 8, 2013, at 7:12 PM, wrote: > >> I have the following URL that is no longer valid >> https://cms.example.com/enterprise/registration/browserinstructions.jsp?productID=100 >> and I have beat myself silly trying to get it to redirect to t

RE: [users@httpd] mod_rewrite question

2013-08-08 Thread Ward.P.Fontenot
My bad, this is a site that uses a fair amount of simple rewrite rules and they are all working correctly. -Original Message- From: Noah Duffy [mailto:noahdu...@fastmail.fm] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 5:20 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_rewrite question

Re: [users@httpd] mod_rewrite question

2013-08-08 Thread Noah Duffy
On Aug 8, 2013, at 7:12 PM, wrote: > I have the following URL that is no longer valid > https://cms.example.com/enterprise/registration/browserinstructions.jsp?productID=100 > and I have beat myself silly trying to get it to redirect to the new correct > URL > https://cms.example.com/enterpri

[users@httpd] mod_rewrite question

2013-08-08 Thread Ward.P.Fontenot
I have the following URL that is no longer valid https://cms.example.com/enterprise/registration/browserinstructions.jsp?prod uctID=100 and I have beat myself silly trying to get it to redirect to the new correct URL https://cms.example.com/enterprise/registration/InternalPersonalCertificates .do?d

Re: [users@httpd] Strange Problem with POST + mod_jk

2013-08-08 Thread Nick Tkach
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 08.08.2013 17:32, Nick Tkach wrote: > > Not quite sure if this needs to wind up in this group or the tomcat list > > since it kind of involves both. I'm fairly sure it involves an Apache > > misconfig, so thought I'd start here. > > > > We'

Re: [users@httpd] Changing the User Which Runs Apache

2013-08-08 Thread Noah Duffy
On Aug 8, 2013, at 5:33 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > Sorry for the long rant. I rarely get down to this mailing list in my > reading. I did today and your discussion thread caught my attention > and I was compelled to comment upon it. I had to read your response twice. It was loaded with more helpf

Re: [users@httpd] Changing the User Which Runs Apache

2013-08-08 Thread Bob Proulx
Noah Duffy wrote: > WordPress may be a bad example, but here's what I'm trying to accomplish: If nothing else it is extremely popular. > When installing, there are just a few files and directories which > contain the pages and PHP. Upon first visit, it has you enter your > admin password and then

Re: [users@httpd] Strange Problem with POST + mod_jk

2013-08-08 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.08.2013 17:32, Nick Tkach wrote: > Not quite sure if this needs to wind up in this group or the tomcat list > since it kind of involves both. I'm fairly sure it involves an Apache > misconfig, so thought I'd start here. > > We've got an Apache facing the Internet with some Java app servers

[users@httpd] "AuthUserFIle not specified error" with FastCGI authorizer via mod_fcgid

2013-08-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, wrote: > I am using Perl code from an old book that refers to mod_fastcgi but I > have mod_fcgid installed. I had to comment out some code ( before exit) and > change Accept() to eliminate some errors in conf/error_log. However, I > still get a 500 instead of what

Re: [users@httpd] Changing the User Which Runs Apache

2013-08-08 Thread Noah Duffy
On Aug 8, 2013, at 12:20 PM, John Iliffe wrote: > Apache has to start as root so it can get permission on the socket > (presumably 80). It then does an su to the uid it runs under. Could be > apache but you can have anything you want. It does not need write or > execute on any of the page d

Re: [users@httpd] Changing the User Which Runs Apache

2013-08-08 Thread John Iliffe
Apache has to start as root so it can get permission on the socket (presumably 80). It then does an su to the uid it runs under. Could be apache but you can have anything you want. It does not need write or execute on any of the page directories just read. They could be owned by you or you

Re: [users@httpd] Need Subject

2013-08-08 Thread zstrebly
Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, wrote: > > I am using Perl code from an old book > > Please use a Subject: in emails to the list > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd]

2013-08-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:27 AM, wrote: > I am using Perl code from an old book Please use a Subject: in emails to the list - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h..

[users@httpd] Strange Problem with POST + mod_jk

2013-08-08 Thread Nick Tkach
Not quite sure if this needs to wind up in this group or the tomcat list since it kind of involves both. I'm fairly sure it involves an Apache misconfig, so thought I'd start here. We've got an Apache facing the Internet with some Java app servers (both jboss and tomcat), pretty standard thing.

[users@httpd]

2013-08-08 Thread zstrebly
I am using Perl code from an old book that refers to mod_fastcgi but I have mod_fcgid installed. I had to comment out some code ( before exit) and change Accept() to eliminate some errors in conf/error_log. However, I still get a 500 instead of what is desired and a message saying: AuthUserFile

[users@httpd] mod_proxy_http.so on apache 2.2 win-32 run on win 2008 64 bit server

2013-08-08 Thread eric tse
I am trying to install mod_proxy_http.so and libxml2.dll on apache 2.2 (32 bit) running on windows 2008 R2 64 bit server. It got the precompiled modules from http://www.apachelounge.com/. When I use the 64 bits, apache told me to use 32 bits (since the apache is 32 bit). When I use the 32 bits, ap

[users@httpd] Compile Error with compiled OpenSSL

2013-08-08 Thread Daniel Sheppard
Good Morning(Afternoon, Evening or Night), I am working to build Apache 2.4.6 on Solaris 11.1. I am receiving this error when building: /usr/local/apr/build-1/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/local/openssl/include -g -O2 -DSOLARIS2=11 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REEN

Re: [users@httpd]

2013-08-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:12 AM, wrote: > > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:48 PM, wrote: > > > > > I am using mod_fcgid with apache 2.4. Is there a FastCgiConfig > equivalent > > > or a way that I can get the same result as if I set the –flush option > on > > > FastCgiConf

[users@httpd] logging

2013-08-08 Thread Pol Hallen
Hi folks :-) I've several virtual host (for each I've the relative access.log e error.log) [...] ErrorLog /home/site1/logs/error.log CustomLog /home/site1/logs/access.log combined [...] I need have the merge of each log files of virtual host also to /var/log/apache2/access.log (and error.log) O

Re: [users@httpd] Apache httpd reverse proxy windows 2012

2013-08-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:58 AM, Shie, Yair wrote: > I have apache httpd 2.4.6 for windows, installed on windows 2012 . It is > configured as a reverse proxy. > > When I use IE locally on this machine and use localhost to access the httpd, > the operation gets stuck. (note that behind the scene th

Re: [users@httpd]

2013-08-08 Thread zstrebly
Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:48 PM, wrote: > > > I am using mod_fcgid with apache 2.4. Is there a FastCgiConfig equivalent > > or a way that I can get the same result as if I set the –flush option on > > FastCgiConfig in a mod_fastcgi application. I need to send custom h

[users@httpd] Re: AuthType Digest in 2.4?

2013-08-08 Thread LuKreme
On 07 Aug 2013, at 17:17 , Ben Reser wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:20 AM, LuKreme wrote: >> First, when we set this up ages ago-go, the way to go was >> >> AuthType digest >> >> And I rather suspect that is *nt* the recommended way to go with 2.4. > > Unless you're going to use SSL you p