I had always believed that Apache Foundation had committed "harakiri" in
not providing the Win32/Win64 binaries because they are very popular for
developers of CMS packages. Now you have given us the true reason of why!.
Now whoever was doing it, can he not post a final document containing
Something similar to this got brought up not that long ago, and it seems to,
well, not elicit as polite responses as one might expect from some people in
the thread. Before that happens, I'll post what I posted last time, hopefully
this will explain things;
"I think what Eric is getting at is th
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Michiel Beijen wrote:
> On the Apache mirrors there are no Windows binaries for Apache 2.2.23
> available:
> http://apache.proserve.nl//httpd/binaries/win32/
>
> there are binaries for 2.2.22 (and even for netware 2.2.23!) - is
> there a reason behind this?
>
The
On the Apache mirrors there are no Windows binaries for Apache 2.2.23 available:
http://apache.proserve.nl//httpd/binaries/win32/
there are binaries for 2.2.22 (and even for netware 2.2.23!) - is
there a reason behind this?
I understand I can compile my own or get it from Apachelounge of
course.
