On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:22 PM, plot.lost wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 15:19, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:15 PM, plot.lost wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a way to do something like the following where the domain part
>>> is
>>> replaced by whatever has been configured in ServerName
>>>
I have successfully generated SSL client certs (generated with openssl
1.0.1c) used by Safari, Firefox, and Chrome on Linux and Windows plus
IE 9 on Windows, but I cannot get successful access with either Safari
or Firefox on Mac OS X.
When I try on Mac/Safari I get the error:
The server did no
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, plot.lost wrote:
> Is there a way to do something like the following where the domain part is
> replaced by whatever has been configured in ServerName
>
> RedirectMatch permanent ^/$ http://the.domain.com/path/to/file.html
>
> i.e. where 'the.domain.com' is whatev
On 12/10/2012 15:19, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:15 PM, plot.lost wrote:
Is there a way to do something like the following where the domain part is
replaced by whatever has been configured in ServerName
RedirectMatch permanent ^/$ http://the.domain.com/path/to/file.html
i.e. w
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:15 PM, plot.lost wrote:
> Is there a way to do something like the following where the domain part is
> replaced by whatever has been configured in ServerName
>
> RedirectMatch permanent ^/$ http://the.domain.com/path/to/file.html
>
> i.e. where 'the.domain.com' is whatev
Is there a way to do something like the following where the domain part
is replaced by whatever has been configured in ServerName
RedirectMatch permanent ^/$ http://the.domain.com/path/to/file.html
i.e. where 'the.domain.com' is whatever the current ServerName is
without having to edit the Re
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> Overall, I'm struggling to see how Apache continues to fit in a world with
>> WebSockets and asynchronous IO playing a larger role. Java servlet engines
>> and app servers are jumping on supporting this. We use Apache for load
>> balancing o
> Overall, I'm struggling to see how Apache continues to fit in a world with
> WebSockets and asynchronous IO playing a larger role. Java servlet engines
> and app servers are jumping on supporting this. We use Apache for load
> balancing over multiple Tomcat instances and for authentication, incl
Does Apache+mod_jk support WebSockets now? If not, when will it?
Same questions for mod_proxy_ajp, though mod_jk was more robust last I
compared the two and the focus of much more development energy.
Or does this work but only with mod_proxy_http? If so, that raises
issues in that we want t
