On Mon, Jul 16, 2012, Nick Kew wrote about "Re: [users@httpd] mod-cgi reads
entire output into memory...":
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:07:23 +0300
> Nadav Har'El wrote:
> > I looked at the httpd code, discovered (if I understand correctly) that
> > 1. As I already guessed, Apache doesn't let the CGI
"Macks wrote:
> Can you run either strace (or dtrace depending on platform) against the
> running process and see what it is doing during the request?
>
> A
> --
> Aaron Macks
> Sr. Unix Systems Engineer
>
> Harvard Business Publishing
> 300 North Beacon St.| Watertown, MA 02472
> (
Can you run either strace (or dtrace depending on platform) against the running
process and see what it is doing during the request?
A
--
Aaron Macks
Sr. Unix Systems Engineer
Harvard Business Publishing
300 North Beacon St.| Watertown, MA 02472
(617) 783-7461| Fax: (617)
Vivek Nambiar wrote:
> May be you can add the hostname and ipaddress in the linux hosts
> file,restart apache and see if that makes any difference??
>
> Thanks
> VIVEK
>
Hi Vivek,
I made suer that there was an entry in /etc/hosts, with both the FQDN and short
hostname and bounced Apache
David Hubbard wrote:
> From: Garrison, Jim (ETW) [mailto:jim.garri...@nike.com]
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30
> > seconds to serve
> > > static images
> >
> > Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to
May be you can add the hostname and ipaddress in the linux hosts
file,restart apache and see if that makes any difference??
Thanks
VIVEK
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:26 AM, David Hubbard <
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
> From: Garrison, Jim (ETW) [mailto:jim.garri...@nike.com]
> >
> > > ---
From: Garrison, Jim (ETW) [mailto:jim.garri...@nike.com]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30
> seconds to serve
> > static images
>
> Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to resolve
> Hostnames and rDNS is not set up
"Garrison wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve
> > static images
>
> Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to resolve
> Hostnames and rDNS is not set up correctly?
>
Jim,
Thanks for the sug
> -Original Message-
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache taking (exactly) 30 seconds to serve
> static images
Just a wild guess, but is it possible Apache is configured to resolve
Hostnames and rDNS is not set up correctly?
Nick Kew wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:47:54 -0400
> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone encountered something like this. What timeouts might be set to
> > 30 seconds in Apache that might be causing this kind of behavior?
>
> Check your keepalive.
>
> If your browser, or some agent on the netwo
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:47:54 -0400
wrote:
> Has anyone encountered something like this. What timeouts might be set to 30
> seconds in Apache that might be causing this kind of behavior?
Check your keepalive.
If your browser, or some agent on the network, is getting its knickers
in a twist abo
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:07:23 +0300
Nadav Har'El wrote:
> When I use it in Apache, Apache itself (NOT the CGI process!) grows
> by 512 MB (!). I was really surprised by this, because ideally Apache
> should hardly grow at all, as at most (if at all) it should be reading
> modest-sized buffers from
Hi,
We are using Apache proxying and also host some static content (images, under
htdocs) on the Apache, and we're finding that, intermittently (we'll have a
page, and say, 2 images will take 30 seconds), it is taking a long time to
serve some images, almost exactly 30 seconds. The Apache is r
Hi, It's been 10 years since my last message to this mailing list, and
I'm happy to join it again :-)
I've encountered a surprising phenomenon with Apache's mod-cgi, which
unnecessarily slows it down for huge outputs, and as a "bonus" also
has a bug: taking up huge amounts of memory:
I have a CGI
14 matches
Mail list logo
