I am experiencing problems with the configure script in attempting to
compile, and actually just running the ./configure script on (2)
different Solaris 11 Sparc based systems.
Systems - T5120 w/32 Gb ram and ample disk space
T2000 w/16 Gb ram and also ample disk space
Both systems are
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Harsimranjit singh Kler <
simran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Experts,
> I am able to reproduce same problem and logs many time now with ab tool
>
> like:
> ab -n 2 -c 800 https://10.48.11.85:10002/index.html
> (I am running lb with ssl on 10002 port)
>
> I stuck
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:47:13 +0530
"J. Bakshi" wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I am trying to make a pre-receive hook which can check /refs/heads/master
> and based on the user name it allow/deny push to master. The git is
> configured over
> http here. So from apache log ; during push I can see
>
> `
Thank you for your response.
I am not looking for caching/site acceleration capabilities. I am looking
at pure load balancing capabilities only.
Are there any know pros/cons or limitations of mod_proxy_balancer and
varnish load balancing? Capabilities that the load balancer that I am
looking for
Dear list,
I am trying to make a pre-receive hook which can check /refs/heads/master
and based on the user name it allow/deny push to master. The git is configured
over
http here. So from apache log ; during push I can see
"GET /git/test.git/info/refs?service=git-receive-pac
On 20.06.2012 22:44, Vivek Nambiar wrote:
A quick question .
When I define the SSLCipherSuite ,would there be a difference in the
syntax according to the OS like windows and Unix? If yes please let me
know the difference in syntax.
No OS dependency. The allowed values depend a bit on the O
You need to decide what options you want from Varnish or mod_proxy_balancer.
Both are different. Varnish is basically for cache and you will not achieve
cache from mod_proxy_balancer.
You can use mod_proxy_balancer for failover and then use Varnish for better
performance/cache on both node
