Re: [users@httpd] Re: Error: The page isn't redirecting properly

On 24/05/12 08:37 PM, Mohamed Daif wrote: hi try this command chmod -R 777 /var/www/"joomla-location"/ On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Csanyi Pal mailto:csanyi...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Mohamed, Mohamed Daif mailto:mohamed.d...@gmail.com>> writes: > disable Use URL rewritin

Re: [users@httpd] CLOSE_WAIT problem

Hi Igor, Right. Maybe I can eliminate them as os params. But, I agree the following contents("It is not a TCP tuning issue") about CLOSE_WAIT. http://www.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/summaries/2006-January/007068.html But, thank you again for your information! Thanks. Regards, Bongjae Chang Fro

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Error: The page isn't redirecting properly

hi try this command chmod -R 777 /var/www/"joomla-location"/ On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Csanyi Pal wrote: > Hi Mohamed, > > Mohamed Daif writes: > > > disable Use URL rewriting from joomla administrator from Global > Configuration > > It is disabled already. > > > On Wed, May 23, 2012

Re: [users@httpd] CLOSE_WAIT problem

You can reduce the time on OS level if you want by tuning the tcp stack. On May 25, 2012 3:00 AM, "Bongjae Chang" wrote: > Hi Eric, > Thank you for quick reply. > > You mean if Apache picks up the closed conn and tries to do some I/O > operations like writing, Apache will failover the conn(with

Re: [users@httpd] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue in 2.2.22 and earlier

On 5/24/2012 12:05 PM, Luke Lozier wrote: > One of the PCI scanning companies is demanding an upgrade to 2.4.2 due to the > issues > described in this CVE: > > Changes with Apache 2.2.23 > > *) SECURITY: CVE-2012-0883 (cve.mitre.org ) > envvars: Fix insecure handling

[users@httpd] Should name based virtual hosts work when the ServerName is an IP address?

If I have a configuration like this: NameVirtualHost 192.200.0.1:80 ServerName default.example.com ... stuff ... ServerName a.example.com ... stuff ... then http://a.example.com/ will return the second site (correctly), not the default site. If I use an IP address as the name

[users@httpd] Turning mod_reqtimeout off on a per session basis

I am seeing some odd behaviour with mod_reqtimeout, and have a couple of questions on its internals (apache2-mpm-prefork 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.9) Q1. I have an environment which is doing this (in essence): RequestReadTimeout header=10-20,minrate=500 RequestReadTimeout body=10,minrate=500 NameVirtualH

Re: [users@httpd] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue in 2.2.22 and earlier

On May 24, 2012 13:05 , Luke Lozier wrote: One of the PCI scanning companies is demanding an upgrade to 2.4.2 due to the issues described in this CVE: Changes with Apache 2.2.23 *) SECURITY: CVE-2012-0883 (cve.mitre.org ) envvars: Fix insecure handling of LD_LIB

Re: [users@httpd] Denial of Service due to multiplication of httpd running

On Thu, 24 May 2012, Pete Houston wrote: A dozen or so idle processes is perfectly normal for prefork (which you are clearly running, BTW). Only worry about this if there are a consistently high number of idle processes (say 30 or more for a lightly loaded server) in which case you can tune the

Re: [users@httpd] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue in 2.2.22 and earlier

The upgrade to 2.4.2 is non-trivial in my environment (particularly due to the config changes) and if 2.2.23 is going to patch it, I'd just as soon wait. Thus the request for some guess at release date. But that's likely not forthcoming, so I'll reconsider the upgrade. --- Bibliopolis, LLC Ber

Re: [users@httpd] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue in 2.2.22 and earlier

I got caught the same way in March (re PCI scanning). Guess my guy is more up to date than yours! There should be no reason that I found not to update to 2.4.2 BUT BE CAREFUL OF THE CONFIG FILE CHANGES! For example the "order deny allow" format directives no longer work in 2.4.*. There are a

[users@httpd] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue in 2.2.22 and earlier

One of the PCI scanning companies is demanding an upgrade to 2.4.2 due to the issues described in this CVE: Changes with Apache 2.2.23 *) SECURITY: CVE-2012-0883 (cve.mitre.org) envvars: Fix insecure handling of LD_LIBRARY_PATH that could lead to the current working directory to be se

[users@httpd] RE: Proxy streaming of files

Does anybody have any experience with files streaming? From: Salvador, Edwin [mailto:esalva...@intercall.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:33 PM To: 'users@httpd.apache.org' Subject: [users@httpd] Proxy streaming of files I configured a reverse-proxy server using apache, but I need to know if

Re: [users@httpd] Denial of Service due to multiplication of httpd running

A dozen or so idle processes is perfectly normal for prefork (which you are clearly running, BTW). Only worry about this if there are a consistently high number of idle processes (say 30 or more for a lightly loaded server) in which case you can tune the value of MaxSpareServers to suit. Have a re

Re: [users@httpd] CLOSE_WAIT problem

Hi Eric, Thank you for quick reply. You mean if Apache picks up the closed conn and tries to do some I/O operations like writing, Apache will failover the conn(with closing the conn and creating/reusing new conn). So CLOSE_WAIT may be normal in this case, right? IMHO, as soon as connections are c

Re: [users@httpd] Denial of Service due to multiplication of httpd running

I was too quick to cry ignorance. I have now gotten mod_status working and here is the output. For some bizarre reason the number of servers is multiplying 68.58.140.236 was downloading another page with lots of pictures on it. (http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/titanic/-- axion is an ancient pseudonym

Re: [users@httpd] Denial of Service due to multiplication of httpd running

On Thu, 24 May 2012, Pete Houston wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:47:37PM -0700, Bill Unruh wrote: But this is clearly a horrible kludge. Is there any way I can figure out what is triggering these versions of httpd to be piling up? Since you've looked at the logs and not found anything ther

[users@httpd] Re: Error: The page isn't redirecting properly

Hi Mohamed, Mohamed Daif writes: > disable Use URL rewriting from joomla administrator from Global Configuration It is disabled already. > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Csanyi Pal wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm running apache2 Version: 2.2.16-6+squeeze4 on my Debian GNU/Linux > Squ

Re: [users@httpd] CLOSE_WAIT problem

Backend connections sit in close_wait until Apache tries to reuse them. What problem does it cause? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Rewrite Role: navigation toolbar trouble

Tx! AliasMatch should be more than enough. Michele MAsè On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Pete Houston wrote: > If you can solve it with a symlink in the filesystem then the equivalent > in the httpd configuration is to use an Alias. > > Pete > -- > Openstrike - improving business through open s

Re: [users@httpd] Rewrite Role: navigation toolbar trouble

If you can solve it with a symlink in the filesystem then the equivalent in the httpd configuration is to use an Alias. Pete -- Openstrike - improving business through open source http://www.openstrike.co.uk/ or call 01722 770036 / 07092 020107 pgpSpcXfWVOSK.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [users@httpd] Denial of Service due to multiplication of httpd running

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:47:37PM -0700, Bill Unruh wrote: > But this is clearly a horrible kludge. Is there any way I can figure > out what is triggering these versions of httpd > to be piling up? Since you've looked at the logs and not found anything there (or at least eliminated what problems

[users@httpd] Rewrite Role: navigation toolbar trouble

I need that the url http://www.example.com/a.htm will point http://www.example.com/a/b/c/d.htm; in navigation toolbar of the browser you should view only http://www.example.com/a.htm. I've "solved" using a symlink between the file /webroot/a/b/c/d.htm and /webroot/a.htm. Is it possible to solve it