Re: [users@httpd] unique virtual server

2012-04-26 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Bashiro wrote: > My problem is: The Seagate NAS have a local IP 192.168 > > I configured the next virtual host like this; > > > ServerName name.seagateshare.com > DocumentRoot 192.168 > > > When browser access name.seagate.com, it goes directly to the dy

[users@httpd] unique virtual server

2012-04-26 Thread Bashiro
Hello, I have two virtual servers that work very fine using a dynamic dns service on port 80. Now I bought myself a Seagate NAS that also uses a dynamic services from Seagate to access files remotely. My problem is: The Seagate NAS have a local IP 192.168 I configured the next virtual host

[users@httpd] Assistance using server-status to determine if configuration could be causing issues or if it may be system compromise

2012-04-26 Thread Stevie
I have Apache 2.2.14 running on Ubuntu 10.04. The server has been running for almost a year without incident. The server is a front-end web server which passes requests for dynamic content (Java) to Tomcat on other servers using mod_jk. April 24th the web server started responding slugglishly to

Re: [users@httpd] "Deny" directives silently ignored in config files

2012-04-26 Thread Eric Covener
> 1) I'd like to understand what was going on. From my understanding, the > line above shouldn't have disabled other "Deny from" directives. Since > are taken into account after , I'd understand that > a "Order" directive could be problematic, but not how a can > be so. The directives from mod_a

Re: [users@httpd] "Deny" directives silently ignored in config files

2012-04-26 Thread Matthieu Moy
Noel Butler writes: > On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 09:04 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > > Noel Butler writes: > > > Right, so have you changed it to Directory and does it now work? > > I tried , and it did not work. - > > You definitely have something broken then if Deny does not w

[users@httpd] Load balancing & session affinity (QUERY)

2012-04-26 Thread GIORGI Olivier
Hello to all, I am using Apache 2.2.21 & Tomcat 6.0.29 1) Schema: Load balancer (Apache.2.2.21) -> 1st appli (Tomcat 6.0.29) -> 2nd appli. (Tomcat 6.0.29) 2) Using the following configuration, my load balancing is stateless instead of statefull (having a look at the logs). -