[users@httpd] Fwd: Build 2.4.2 RPMs fails on Centos 6.2 for ?deprecated? dependancy distcache

2012-04-19 Thread Billy Baker
Bit more information regarding this I am able to configure, make, and install httpd. I guess with apr-devel out of the way I'll be trying this method for now. I checked the src rpm for httpd-2.2.14-2 and found this comment in httpd.spec * Tue Dec 8 2009 Joe Orton - 2.2.14-2 - drop distcach

[users@httpd] Build 2.4.2 RPMs fails on Centos 6.2 for ?deprecated? dependancy distcache

2012-04-19 Thread Billy Baker
Greets, I'm building the httpd 2.4.2 RPM packages for our systems. Using Centos 6.2 I have built RPM's for APR 1.4 and APR-devel 1.4 those installed fine. I thought this was going to be easy. :) All other dependencies have been cleared but the last. distcache-devel. I'm wondering if distcache-

Re: [users@httpd] Conversion 2.2.14 -> 2.4.1 still problems

2012-04-19 Thread John Iliffe
On Thursday 19 April 2012 15:02:20 James wrote: > To my knowledge, --with-openssl is not configuration flag. When oops! Yes, mea culpa, a typing error. This upgrade, which is time limited and crucial, has been such a disaster that now I'm making mistakes where I should know better. Thanks for

Re: Re: [users@httpd] Conversion 2.2.14 -> 2.4.1 still problems

2012-04-19 Thread James
To my knowledge, --with-openssl is not configuration flag. When compiling 2.4.X, the following has worked for me. --enable-ssl=shared --with-ssl=/path/to/openssl For example, I install OpenSSL to /my/application/support and my --with-ssl argument looks like this: --with-ssl=/my/application/supp

Re: [users@httpd] Conversion 2.2.14 -> 2.4.1 still problems

2012-04-19 Thread John Iliffe
Thanks. I pick that up tonight. That puts me back to square one! One thing I noticed but as it doesn't seem to make any immediate difference I didn't report it: I installed OpenSSL 1.0.1 and configured Apache as: --with-openssl= but the start up messages from Apache in the log attached to my

Re: [users@httpd] Conversion 2.2.14 -> 2.4.1 still problems

2012-04-19 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
As mentioned on this list, 2.4.2 was just released. You will want to pick up that update. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Conversion 2.2.14 -> 2.4.1 still problems

2012-04-19 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/19/2012 1:01 PM, John Iliffe wrote: > After factoring in the suggestions from a number of folks here (thanks!) I > still have problems getting a working configuration. > > Many pages depend on PHP and I upgraded PHP to version 5.4.0, compiled it > as an apxs module PHP fans everywhere will

Re: [users@httpd] Conversion 2.2.14 -> 2.4.1 still problems

2012-04-19 Thread John Iliffe
On Thursday 19 April 2012 14:01:37 John Iliffe wrote: > After factoring in the suggestions from a number of folks here (thanks!) > I still have problems getting a working configuration. > > Many pages depend on PHP and I upgraded PHP to version 5.4.0, compiled > it as an apxs module in conjunction

[users@httpd] Conversion 2.2.14 -> 2.4.1 still problems

2012-04-19 Thread John Iliffe
After factoring in the suggestions from a number of folks here (thanks!) I still have problems getting a working configuration. Many pages depend on PHP and I upgraded PHP to version 5.4.0, compiled it as an apxs module in conjunction with Apache 2.4.1 resulting in /usr/apache-2.4.1/modules/

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.1 Installation problems

2012-04-19 Thread John Iliffe
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:48:17 Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 2012-04-17 17:48, John Iliffe wrote: > > I am trying to update from 2.2.14 to 2.4.1 and have encountered two > > problems. 2.2.14 has been working properly for over 2 years. Pages > > are located on a separate directory starting at /www

Re: [users@httpd] Upgrade Apache 1.3.41 to 2.2.22

2012-04-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Pablo Armando wrote: > I did just that today (1.3 > 2.2). It is simple. > > > I noted this: > > - Delete User/Group/BytesLog directive from vhosts (if you have them). > > - BytesLog could be replaced by something like this i think: > > LogFormat "%{%s}t %B ."

Re: [users@httpd] Upgrade Apache 1.3.41 to 2.2.22

2012-04-19 Thread Pablo Armando
I did just that today (1.3 > 2.2). It is simple. I noted this: - Delete User/Group/BytesLog directive from vhosts (if you have them). - BytesLog could be replaced by something like this i think: LogFormat "%{%s}t %B ." bytes_count CustomLog domlogs/example.com-bytes_log bytes_count - In

Re: [users@httpd] "Deny" directives silently ignored in config files

2012-04-19 Thread Matthieu Moy
Matthieu Moy writes: >> You might also add >> >> AllowOverride None > > I'll try that I did try, and it did not change the problem. Deny directives are still ignored. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ - T

Re: [users@httpd] httpd.spec patch for httpd-2.4.2

2012-04-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Brian Millett wrote: > The spec file for httpd-2.4.2 is missing a small addition for the fcgistarter > man page. Hi Brian, It is likely that your post to users@ is sufficient for such a simple fix (i.e., will reach a developer with time/inclination), but it is w

Re: [users@httpd] Upgrade Apache 1.3.41 to 2.2.22

2012-04-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.04.12 13:57, ithier@jdi.socom.mil wrote: Do I need to upgrade from 1.3 to 2.0, before I can upgrade to 2.2? No. Or should I start fresh with version 2.2? no problems. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail adve

[users@httpd] httpd.spec patch for httpd-2.4.2

2012-04-19 Thread Brian Millett
The spec file for httpd-2.4.2 is missing a small addition for the fcgistarter man page. [bpm]$ diff -wruN httpd.spec~ httpd.spec --- httpd.spec~ 2012-04-19 08:51:25.737085249 -0500 +++ httpd.spec 2012-04-19 09:14:35.287676097 -0500 @@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ %{_mandir}/man1/ab.1* %{_mandir}/man1/logre

[users@httpd] Upgrade Apache 1.3.41 to 2.2.22

2012-04-19 Thread ithier.ctr
Do I need to upgrade from 1.3 to 2.0, before I can upgrade to 2.2? Or should I start fresh with version 2.2? For security reasons I need to update Apache 1.3.41 (Unix) mod_perl to Apache 2.2.22. Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: [users@httpd] mod_disk_cache and php

2012-04-19 Thread william . leonard
I was able to get this working by switching the caching to the backend and then just switching it to the front end with clearing the cache and restarting the services in between. I had done this before and have even done this from fresh installs to no avail. Well it works now anyway. -W