Hi,
I am using mod_proxy_balancer, because in that case I would be able to
handle load balancing or failover. I followed this URL:
http://www.johnandcailin.com/blog/john/scaling-drupal-step-two-sticky-load-b
alancing-apache-modproxy
for php. I have placed PHP sessions on mounted locatio
Hi,
Just trying to clarify it is best to allow these in the virtualhost
root on a per domain
For instance at present we have
AllowOverride None
Options None
Require all denied
I know this is good :)
But then we have
AllowOverride AuthConfig
Options +Indexes
now assume ea
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:01:51 PM, Abhi Auradkar wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
> I have apache httpd 2.2.21. I load a custom module into it.
> When this is done I always need to be a root or sudo to start apache
> process.
>
> If I run apache as any other user the command 'httpd -k start' never
> return
All,
I have apache httpd 2.2.21. I load a custom module into it.
When this is done I always need to be a root or sudo to start apache process.
If I run apache as any other user the command 'httpd -k start' never returns to
prompt.
If I comment the LoadModule for my module apache starts fi
All,
I have apache httpd 2.2.21. I load a custom module into it.
When this is done I always need to be a root or sudo to start apache process.
If I run apache as any other user the command 'httpd -k start' never returns to
prompt.
If I comment the LoadModule for my module apache starts fi
I recently switched from using a Caucho Resin backend (mod_caucho) to Jetty
7.2.2 via AJP for running Railo webapps
under Apache 2.2.19/Centos 5
An issue that has come up since the switch is that HTTPS sites no longer set
the CGI scope variable 'https' to 'on' -
it's just an empty string. I'm no
On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:40 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> It's unfortunate that it has to work this way but forks are pretty cheap
> these days.
>
> No it doesn't generate content. It can't run as a CGI.
Cheap != free no matter how cheap ;)
---
On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a
>> low priority
>> for everyone else.
>
> I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single
> reque
Last but not the least mod_proxy_balancer supports AJP protocol :)
-Anam
From: Anam Ali Khan
To: "users@httpd.apache.org" ; Kashif Rahman
Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 23:07
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache + Tomcat Load Balancing
Dear Kashif, as per yo
Dear Kashif, as per your comments below:
We are using mod_proxy_ajp
Tomcat is clustered. Session replication works, if single Apache is handling 2
tomcat instances. When we start second Apache, tomcat session
replication stops. We want to have failover for PHP side too.
Why are you using mo
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:25:54 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>>
>> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a
>> low priority
>> for everyone else.
>
>
> I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a
> low priority
> for everyone else.
I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single
request and then exiting could possibly be the most silly way to se
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:11:17 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor
>>> wrote:
Previously posted to dev and bu
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of
>>> capturing a greater audience that might hav
On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:42:35 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor
> wrote:
>>
>> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of
>> capturing a greater audience that might have come
>> across this issue before.
>>
>> We have written a modu
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:39 PM, William Taylor wrote:
> Previously posted to dev and bugs. Posting here also in hopes of
> capturing a greater audience that might have come
> across this issue before.
>
> We have written a modules for apache that for certain reasons requires
> one hit per child.
First check Apache supports session stickness in PHP application environment,
if yes then you can go with your current configuration instead of HAproxy.
-Anam
From: Kashif Rahman
To: users@httpd.apache.org; 'Anam Ali Khan'
Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 2:45
On 12/03/2012 20:36, Arianna Manlio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please, look at this mod-status output:
>
> Current Time: Monday, 12-Mar-2012 17:00:38 CET
> Restart Time: Monday, 12-Mar-2012 16:58:11 CET
> Parent Server Generation: 4
> Current Time: Monday, 12-Mar-2012 17:00:38 CET
> Restart Time: Monday, 1
18 matches
Mail list logo
