Is 2.4.1 is compatible with OpenSSL 1.0.0.?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> **
> On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:45 +0530, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:
>
> i want to use openssl 0.9.8. Is this compatible with 2.4.1?
>
>
> Builds fine with openssl-0.9.8 I build against openssl
On 03/03/2012 06:51 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Andy Wang wrote:
>
>> 've been following the various changes with Apache 2.4.x (and 2.3.x during
>> development regarding the removal of apr/apr-util and pcre from the Apache
>> source bundle and noted that:
>> http://httpd
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 23:19 +0100, Mathijs wrote:
> The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
> maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other
> modifications. This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache
> 1.x and Apache 2.x, but its use is mostl
Mathijs gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other modifications.
This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache 1.x and Apache 2.x, but
its
use is mostly void nowadays.
The Debian/Ubuntu distributions, or rather their Apache HTTPD package
maintainers, have renamed the binary to apache2, amongst other
modifications. This was mainly done to differentiate between Apache 1.x and
Apache 2.x, but its use is mostly void nowadays.
Some other changes and layout peculiarit
I'm very puzzled with this simple question: the name of the http server is
httpd
or apache2?
This is because, all apache documentation, in http.apache.org, refers to it as
"httpd", however in my Ubuntu installation it appears to be "apache2".
Were not I someone that has some idea of this, I wo
Thank you! This worked for me :)
ProxyPass fcgi://127.0.0.1:9000
I'm not sure why the ProxyPassMatch does not work inside the vhost though,
but LocationMatch does.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
denni...@conversis.de> wrote:
> I haven't been able to play with this
On 5 March 2012 08:06, Steve Swift wrote:
> This certainly sounds like a situation for SUEXEC.
>
> However, if you need the apache server to assign files to arbitrary
> user:group then there are two ways that I know of:
>
>1. You could create a SUDO entry which allows apache to use the
>c
On March 5, 2012 11:20 , Rajeev Prasad wrote:
thx Mark, it does help to understand things better. so that mean
grsecurity and AppArmor doing the same thing? except that grsecurity
is much complex and harder i guess. (I wanted to do that, but does not
have enough expertise to think of building
> >The strange thing is that everything works with apache 2.2.x, so
> >my guess is that there are either new but undocumented configuration
> >switches or we have a regression in 2.4.1.
> >BTW, I've found another report for probably the same issue, see [1].
>
> >[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.
thx Mark, it does help to understand things better. so that mean grsecurity and
AppArmor doing the same thing? except that grsecurity is much complex and
harder i guess. (I wanted to do that, but does not have enough expertise to
think of building a LAMP install on grsecurity patched ubuntu.)
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 06:06:51PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 01.03.2012 17:19, Juergen Daubert wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:38:10PM +, Nick Kew wrote:
> >>On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:34:22 +0100
> >>Juergen Daubert wrote:
> >>
> >>>Any ideas or suggestions?
> >>
> >>Set Loglevel to debu
I haven't been able to play with this yet but shouldn't something like this
work as well?
ProxyPass fcgi://127.0.0.1:9000
Regards,
Dennis
On 03/05/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel wrote:
I have found an alternative method that works nicely, only passes .php
files to PHP-FPM and allows the variables
On March 5, 2012 8:32 , "Hajo Locke" wrote:
ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by
mod-status for my users?
every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view
complete status.
how to disable this?
Disable mod_status, or turn off .htaccess files, or
hello,
I'm afraid the only way to disable this is to disable mod_status.
I don't know of any other way and I that's why I don't use mod_status.
which module you are using? i cant renounce to view a statuspage of my
server.
Thanks,
Hans
-
On 05.03.12 14:32, Hajo Locke wrote:
ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by
mod-status for my users?
every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view
complete status.
I'm afraid the only way to disable this is to disable mod_status.
I don't know of
On 02.03.12 15:29, Soumendu Bhattacharya wrote:
We use Apache + mod_cache for caching our website. Our mod_cache
rule is such that it enables caching for all and then selectively certain
url pattern is disabled (like some contexts). Currently the need is that if
a certain cookie is present
Hi!
When porting/cross-compiling the Apache HTTP Server the build fails with
the following error message: "/bin/sh: ./gen_test_char: cannot execute
binary file".
This is due to that the gen_test_char is compiled with the
cross-compiler but executed on the build system.
This error has been around
I have found an alternative method that works nicely, only passes .php
files to PHP-FPM and allows the variables to pass.
ProxyPassMatch ^(.*\.php)$ fcgi://
127.0.0.1:9000/www/danielhe/danielhe.com/cookie.danielhe.com$1
This is really weird though, because when it's put outside of a vhost, it
work
On March 3, 2012 7:22 , Daniel wrote:
Thank you, I just realized that earlier, as I thought Location /www/
meant server side.
It works, however it passes all traffic through PHP-FPM and gives a
"Access denied." message on static files, and does not allow passing
variables through the URL with
Hello List,
ist there any possibility to hide server-status page provided by mod-status
for my users?
every user with .htaccess is able to use sethandler and able to view
complete status.
how to disable this?
Thanks,
Hajo
---
On March 4, 2012 22:11 , Rajeev Prasad wrote:
want to make sure my web server is highly secure.
I am not sure between modsecurity and AppArmor. can someone help with
their experience?
mod_security is a web application firewall that works at the HTTP level
to protect the web server and web ap
On 3/5/2012 1:03 AM, Alain Roger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on my local windows 7 computer, i have installed and setup a web
> server for development purpose.
> everything works well under port 80 (listening, servername, etc..), i
> also setup virtualhost in extra conf file as following:
>
> DocumentRoot
>
>
> 2012/3/4 Igor Galić
>
>
>
> [snip]
>
> > You will need to rebuild all external modules of course
> given its a
> > new major (like php, mod_perl etc)
>
>
>
> The latest stable of mod_perl (2.0.5
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 14:45 +0530, Harsimranjit singh Kler wrote:
> i want to use openssl 0.9.8. Is this compatible with 2.4.1?
Builds fine with openssl-0.9.8 I build against openssl-0.9.8t
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
i want to use openssl 0.9.8. Is this compatible with 2.4.1?
2012/3/4 Igor Galić
>
>
> [snip]
> > You will need to rebuild all external modules of course given its a
> > new major (like php, mod_perl etc)
>
> The latest stable of mod_perl (2.0.5) doesn't currently build with
> 2.4.1. Haven't check
On 02.03.2012, at 15:59, Vivek Nambiar wrote:
> http://servername:port/myapp then it should redirect itself to
> https://servername:SSLport/myapp.
>
> I have added the following rewrite condition and rule in my httpd.conf file
>
> RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} PORT
> RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ https://%{S
27 matches
Mail list logo