- GlassFish Server Open Source Edition 3.1
- Server Version: Apache/2.2.22 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.22 OpenSSL/1.0.0-fips
mod_jk/1.2.32
- JK Version: mod_jk/1.2.32 ()
I have succedfully created two instances in a clusterter, one of which is
located at node (DAS installed)
other one is insta
Thats what " Require valid-user " doing. Try with " Require any"
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
>I have an odd (to me) question. When I setup my AuthTypes as so:
>
>
>AuthType KerberosV5
>KrbAuthRealms DOMAIN.COM
>
As a diagnostic step, set "KeepAlive Off" and see if the problem
reproduces just as before.
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To
Hi Everyone,
BACKGROUND: I'm attempting to move a web site from an older host running
Win2K server and Apache 2.2.8 (installed using
apache_2.2.8-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8e.msi) to one running Ubuntu 11.10
64-bit server and Apache 2.2.20 (installed from the Ubuntu repositories
- version 2.2.20-
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 09:04 -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> You should be able to confirm in a packet capture or by logging
> %{SSL_TLS_SNI}e.
(after the first ";" you see the SNI host)
02/19/12 17:57:35> 129.187.131.227:443 188.174.212.187;
lcg-lrz-monitoring.grid.lrz.de /C=DE/O=GermanGrid/OU=LMU/
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 09:04 -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> > 2nd access:
> > I get an error, that no SNI hostname would have been provided, but still,
> > the ouput appears in the log file of the non-default name based vhost,
> > strange isn't it?
> No, Apache will still do normal vhost resolution.
B
> 2nd access:
> I get an error, that no SNI hostname would have been provided, but still,
> the ouput appears in the log file of the non-default name based vhost,
> strange isn't it?
>
No, Apache will still do normal vhost resolution. It's only mod_ssl
that will jump in the way if that occurred wi
