[users@httpd] AUTO: Murtaza Hathiwala is out of the office (returning 01/27/2012)

I am out of the office until 01/27/2012. I 'll be Out of Office starting Friday Jan 27th 2012. Returning on Monday Jan 30th 2012 Please contact below persons as my backups during my absence. Satya Samala as my backup for any immediate middleware assistance Team Lead: Lorraine Lilly Manager : Ri

Re: [users@httpd] Web Hosting

The two suggestions are okay, but I would like to do this from the CLI. Is there any way to allow users on the system to have their own website? I know you can have websites in users home directories. The problem is permissions. The Apache users needs access to the website files for things like PH

Re: [users@httpd] Web Hosting

Quoting Igor Cicimov : CPANEL or maybe not... I use virtualmin GPL for this and have had very good results. The GUI is nice and doesn't stop your users from managing their own sites and mails, etc... Dave On Jan 27, 2012 7:42 AM, "Damien Hull" wrote: I'm running a LAMP server on Ub

Re: [users@httpd] redirect based on HTTP_HOST using mod_rewrite

You are right I have updated my conf for NameVirtualHost instead of mod_rewrite, it does the job Thanks On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:41:49 PM Pete Houston wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:58:02PM +0100, Thomas Carrié wrote: > > It is the first time I use module mod_rewrite is totally ne

Re: [users@httpd] Question regarding OS support for Apache version 2.2.21....

On 1/26/2012 4:12 PM, Mark Hamer wrote: > > That is what I was askingif it will install and run without trouble. I > plan on > uprading it. Currently I have the following Apache version installed and > running. If you aren't installing an rpm (and you can try the current source rpms for

Re: [users@httpd] Question regarding OS support for Apache version 2.2.21....

Thanks Mark That is what I was askingif it will install and run without trouble. I plan on uprading it. Currently I have the following Apache version installed and running. # httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.8 (Unix) Server built: Jan 28 2008 06:24:44 # rpm -qa|grep http httpd-manu

Re: [users@httpd] Web Hosting

CPANEL On Jan 27, 2012 7:42 AM, "Damien Hull" wrote: > I'm running a LAMP server on Ubuntu 10.04. I have no trouble managing > my own web sites. I have root access. I can't seem to figure out how > to do this for users. This would be some sort of web hosting > configuration. > > 1. Users should b

Re: [users@httpd] Question regarding OS support for Apache version 2.2.21....

On January 26, 2012 16:32 , Mark Hamer wrote: I want to know if *httpd version 2.2.21* is supported on older versions of Linux?Example Fedora 8 running on 32bit kernel. What, specifically, do you mean by "is supported"? If you mean, "will it compile and run without trouble, compared to ot

[users@httpd] Question regarding OS support for Apache version 2.2.21....

Hello all I want to know if httpd version 2.2.21 is supported on older versions of Linux?Example Fedora 8 running on 32bit kernel. - Mark Hamer

[users@httpd] Web Hosting

I'm running a LAMP server on Ubuntu 10.04. I have no trouble managing my own web sites. I have root access. I can't seem to figure out how to do this for users. This would be some sort of web hosting configuration. 1. Users should be allowed to install any kind of web application / site 2. Correct

Re: [users@httpd] Running cgi binaries as root

On January 26, 2012 13:51 , Doug McNutt wrote: At 09:56 -0500 1/26/12, Mark Montague wrote, and I snipped a bunch: On January 26, 2012 2:50 , Tarzan Jane wrote: Concerning the security I believe when using binary scripts, security is increased some levels. Si

Re: [users@httpd] Running cgi binaries as root

At 09:56 -0500 1/26/12, Mark Montague wrote, and I snipped a bunch: >On January 26, 2012 2:50 , Tarzan Jane > wrote: > >>Concerning the security I believe when using binary scripts, security is >>increased some levels. Since the cgi binaries are no longer acsii file

Re: [users@httpd] Apache forking a forked child process -- is that possible?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Mark Montague wrote: > On January 26, 2012 9:07 , =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=81rlis_Repsons?= > wrote: >> >> as this seemed the only place to ask my question, here it goes: >> is it ever possible that Apache (as we currently know it) makes a fork >> of a child >> process, whi

Re: [users@httpd] Modules - mod_pagespeed & mod_jk

Thanks Eric! Regards SS From: Eric Covener To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: 01/25/2012 09:03 AM Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Modules - mod_pagespeed & mod_jk On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Satya Samala wrote: > > Can these modules(mod_pagespeed & mod_jk ) be in

Re: [users@httpd] Running cgi binaries as root

On January 26, 2012 2:50 , Tarzan Jane wrote: Concerning the security I believe when using binary scripts, security is increased some levels. Since the cgi binaries are no longer acsii files, injecting or altering code is hardly possible. The only way to breach security is to replace the binar

Re: [users@httpd] Apache forking a forked child process -- is that possible?

On January 26, 2012 9:07 , =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=81rlis_Repsons?= wrote: as this seemed the only place to ask my question, here it goes: is it ever possible that Apache (as we currently know it) makes a fork of a child process, which has already processed some requests? Yes. When the child receives

[users@httpd] Apache forking a forked child process -- is that possible?

Greetings to all, as this seemed the only place to ask my question, here it goes: is it ever possible that Apache (as we currently know it) makes a fork of a child process, which has already processed some requests? - The officia