Re: [users@httpd] XHTML > Set Content-Type as "application/xhtml+xml" for browsers that support it otherwise degrade to "text/html"

2011-05-02 Thread Nick Kew
On 2 May 2011, at 19:26, Geoff Millikan wrote: > PS. We'd consider using mod_negotiation to do this but we'd prefer not to > make a HTML and XHTML of the same page. We're just going > to make one XHTML document and send it to everyone. The browsers that don't > support XHTML will just have to

RE: [users@httpd] XHTML > Set Content-Type as "application/xhtml+xml" for browsers that support it otherwise degrade to "text/html"

2011-05-02 Thread Geoff Millikan
>Is the best way to do this like: > AddDefaultCharset text/html > SetEnvIfNoCase Accept "xhtml" ua_supports_xhtml=1 > Header set Content-Type "application/xhtml+xml" env=ua_supports_xhtml Not sure if above method is "best" but we tested and it "works" but since we're using mod_cache it doesn't w

[users@httpd] XHTML > Set Content-Type as "application/xhtml+xml" for browsers that support it otherwise degrade to "text/html"

2011-05-02 Thread Geoff Millikan
Dear List, For the browsers that support XHTML we'll set the Content-Type as "application/xhtml+xml" otherwise we'll send the same XHTML document as Content-Type "text/html." Is the best way to do this like: AddDefaultCharset text/html SetEnvIfNoCase Accept "xhtml" ua_supports_xhtml=1 Header s

Re: [users@httpd] mod_fcgid: Invalid command 'FcgidMinProcessesPerClass'

2011-05-02 Thread Duke
Hi Jeff, On 5/2/11 12:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Duke wrote: Hi Jeff, On 5/2/11 12:16 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Dukewrote: Hi all, Please forgive me if the question was asked before. I have been using apache for quite a bi

Re: [users@httpd] mod_fcgid: Invalid command 'FcgidMinProcessesPerClass'

2011-05-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Duke wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On 5/2/11 12:16 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Duke  wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please forgive me if the question was asked before. I have been using >>> apache >>> for quite a bit of time (3-4 years) b

Re: [users@httpd] mod_fcgid: Invalid command 'FcgidMinProcessesPerClass'

2011-05-02 Thread Duke
Hi Jeff, On 5/2/11 12:16 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Duke wrote: Hi all, Please forgive me if the question was asked before. I have been using apache for quite a bit of time (3-4 years) but I am totally new to the group. Recently I tried to give our Red Hat server

Re: [users@httpd] mod_fcgid: Invalid command 'FcgidMinProcessesPerClass'

2011-05-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Duke wrote: > Hi all, > > Please forgive me if the question was asked before. I have been using apache > for quite a bit of time (3-4 years) but I am totally new to the group. > Recently I tried to give our Red Hat server's apache FastCGI capability and > hence I i

Re: [users@httpd] userdirs inaccessible after upgrade

2011-05-02 Thread Allen
Ah, I stand corrected. namei -m showed this: drwxr-xr-x / drwxr-xr-x home drwxrwx--- user drwxr-xr-x public_html -rw-r--r-- index.html I changed the permissions on my user folder to --x and was then able to access my userdir. I checked the permissions on the other users and they're all t

[users@httpd] mod_fcgid: Invalid command 'FcgidMinProcessesPerClass'

2011-05-02 Thread Duke
Hi all, Please forgive me if the question was asked before. I have been using apache for quite a bit of time (3-4 years) but I am totally new to the group. Recently I tried to give our Red Hat server's apache FastCGI capability and hence I installed mod_fcgid. The module loaded fine, but issu

Re: [users@httpd] Updating mod_ssl -- need to recompile Apache et al?

2011-05-02 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Monday, May 2, 2011, Satish Patel wrote: > You can upgrade mod_ssl without recompile apache if your apache support DSO > > Use apxe tool to compile mod_ssl > That won't help prevent the Apple software updater from overwriting the change. ---

Re: [users@httpd] userdirs inaccessible after upgrade

2011-05-02 Thread Frank Gingras
On 02/05/2011 9:22 AM, Allen Seelye wrote: See http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/13PermissionDenied Frank Thanks Franks, this is not a file permission problem though. I've set the permissions for the index.html, and every folder up to it, wide open and I still get a permission denied error. I did

Re: [users@httpd] userdirs inaccessible after upgrade

2011-05-02 Thread Allen Seelye
> > See http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/13PermissionDenied > > Frank > Thanks Franks, this is not a file permission problem though. I've set the permissions for the index.html, and every folder up to it, wide open and I still get a permission denied error. I did the namei command and this was t

[users@httpd] Re: mod_reqtimeout not returning 408

2011-05-02 Thread Guillaume Bilodeau
Hi all, I have opened a bug report and received confirmation that issues in HTTPD Core are causing the following problems: - Apache doesn't always return a 408 when a request time out is detected (various cases) - Apache doesn't handle a request time out properly when the URL corresponds to a Red

Re: [users@httpd] userdirs inaccessible after upgrade

2011-05-02 Thread Francois Gingras
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Allen Seelye wrote: >> >> I upgraded from ubuntu 9.10 to 10.10. Now my userdirs are inaccessible. >> >> The access log reads: >> - >> "GET /~use

Re: [users@httpd] Updating mod_ssl -- need to recompile Apache et al?

2011-05-02 Thread Satish Patel
You can upgrade mod_ssl without recompile apache if your apache support DSO Use apxe tool to compile mod_ssl -- Sent from my iPhone On May 1, 2011, at 10:53 AM, René Fournier wrote: Hi, I need to update Apache's SSL to the latest version (1.0.0d). Is it necessary to recompile all of Apa