You miss understand. A user with ftp access only to a single virtual host can
upload a PHP shell to there web space. The PHP shell allows them to login with
a made up password they make. Once logged in to the PHP shell they are no
longer restricted by there FTP login permissions due to the fact
Hi,
I am not sure whether the problem i am going to describe had been
already faced by someone? At least I tried to look into google and
httpd mail archives but didn't get much help, so I am writing this
mail.
I am running apache 2.2.17 on Linux 2.6.18-128.el5 with 16 Intel Xeon
E7440 @ 2.40GHz p
Hi All,
What are the approaches need to be taken for dynamic load balancing.Like
suppose I have 3 instances of Apache is running and due to some issue one of
the instance goes down.I would expect the traffic should be balanced
properly by the existing 2 instances.
For load balancing apart from mod
thanks! F5 supports the cookies and is recommended way but the problem
is server A is not managed by us and may be very difficult to
convience them to enter cookie (changing code). Is it possible to
embed cookies for non-browser clients in serverA?
Are there any other options if server A can't be
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Yes but when we receive request it is not from the end user but other
> host. For eg:
>
> User -> server A (prepares file) -> (http request that need load
> balancing) Our host
>
> So it's server A actually making the request not the user b
Yes but when we receive request it is not from the end user but other
host. For eg:
User -> server A (prepares file) -> (http request that need load
balancing) Our host
So it's server A actually making the request not the user but we need
to load balance user because this user can sign off and c
Aren't the requests from one user coming from the same ip? This method will
cause the requests coming from one source ip address always go to the same
server ip address ... but as I said maybe I'm missing something :)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> But this doesn't work
TO Mark Montague:
CC Eric Covener, Others:
Thanks!
As Eric and Mark said, do you have the document or web-link file explain this
viewpoint?( Apache doesn't discriminate the http methods to access CGI.)
> Apache doesn't know what methods your CGI understands, so it doesn't
> discriminate.
But this doesn't work for scenario that I described where user
connects to server and then server sends the requests to us. We really
want to load balance users not the servers.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Also the difference between GTM and LTM is that GTM enables fail
In order to circimvent this bug
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-366 what should I exactly have
in apache 2 properties.
We often see "cping/cpong after connecting to the backend server
failed (errno=110)" and bunch of 503s
Current worker.properties look something like this:
worker.app1.typ
Also the difference between GTM and LTM is that GTM enables fail-over
between geographically different sites and for LTM that is possible only for
local sites. Nothing to do with the persistence feature.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Strange because a quick search gives
Strange because a quick search gives me this
http://devcentral-sea.f5.com/Community/GroupDetails/tabid/1082223/asg/50/aft/26947/showtab/groupforums/Default.aspx
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Are you referrring to GTM or LTM. I have looked into it and even
> talked to F
Are you referrring to GTM or LTM. I have looked into it and even
talked to F5 but currently they don't have this functionality for
Prod.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just scanned through the thread quickly so not sure if this makes any sense
> but what about
Hi guys,
Just scanned through the thread quickly so not sure if this makes any sense
but what about F5 source IP stickiness?
Cheers,
Igor
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> Currently, the load balancer don't provide the user
> stickyness/persistence for 'x' amount of time.
On 03/21/2011 03:28 AM, aaron...@comcast.net wrote:
If a PHP Shell can be uploaded. http://phpshell.sourceforge.net/ Then
any thing www-data can do so can the shell user, As stated in my post
about virtual hosts seeing each others document roots.
If you post the root password on your website,
Currently, the load balancer don't provide the user
stickyness/persistence for 'x' amount of time. At this point only
option I see is that of creating a custom solution. It looks like
there is no good solution.
Problem here is User can be directed to any site by load balancer in
active active scen
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:43:27 -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
- how is this possible that no dump is created? I am pretty sure
something
is wrong in my settings, but I am definitely missing it...
ulimit -c ?
-
The official User-To
> - how is this possible that no dump is created? I am pretty sure something
> is wrong in my settings, but I am definitely missing it...
ulimit -c ?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
S
Hi,
I am stack with trying to debug segfaults happening almost every
seconds.
The problem is that the child process always dies without creating a
dump file.
Of course, I did configure this directive in httpd.conf (note that I am
running Debian 6.0):
CoreDumpDirectory /tmp/apache-dumps
I
19 matches
Mail list logo
