Re: [users@httpd] Different vhosts.conf between Apache 2.2.17 for Windows and Apache for Linux 2.2.14-rc1 - issue 25435?

2011-02-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/11/2011 1:17 AM, Zeno Davatz wrote: > Dear William > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: >> On 2/10/2011 2:48 AM, Zeno Davatz wrote: >>> >>> It seems that Apache for Windows interprets vhosts.conf files >>> differently then Apache for Linux does. I am asking this

Re: [users@httpd] Global 301 Redirects

2011-02-14 Thread Asai
Thank you for your response. Much appreciated. --asai On 2/9/2011 10:45 AM, Igor Galić wrote: - Original Message - Greetings, I'm trying to figure out a way to have each of my vhosts do a 301 redirect upon receiving a request which contains "www." Basically we want to drop all of

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Apache Web Server for Windows 64 bit OS

2011-02-14 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
These are bit outdate though: http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/knowledge/tutorials/convert http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/knowledge/tutorials/x64 ~Jorge On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Priya George wrote: > Thanks everyone for the response ! Our team has decided to give compilation > a

RE: [users@httpd] Re: Apache Web Server for Windows 64 bit OS

2011-02-14 Thread Priya George
Thanks everyone for the response ! Our team has decided to give compilation a shot. I found this link - http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/platform/win_compiling.html , seems like a good place to start. Please share any other good resources that you might have with win_compiling on 64 bit. Tha

[users@httpd] database expires and kills website

2011-02-14 Thread Norman Fournier
Hello, A newbie question: I have a website running with an expiry date set for 1 week in the database file. Once the .db file expires the site goes offline. I then have increment the serial number, to grep for "named" and -HUP the process to bring the site online again. All of my other sites

Re: [users@httpd] SSH authentication: Multiple authentication dialog windows popping up

2011-02-14 Thread Ben Timby
Nick, this does not sound right to me. Here is why: If your main HTML was protected by login, the user would be prompted to authenticate themselves before receiving the HTML. This would keep the browser from making further requests until authentication occurred. It sounds like in your situation,

[users@httpd] RE: include virtual --> proxypass: encoded page

2011-02-14 Thread Rasconi Luca (u.e.)
Sorry for the insistence, but I'm becoming crazy... I've a page, container.html like this: This is the body! My apache conf has this rules RewriteRule /_includes/header\.html http://partner.server.com/_template/fornitori/header.shtml [P] If I call, from a browser, http://myhost.com/_includ